• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The House of Lords, is their need for futher reform?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The House of Lords has always been a talking point in British politics, mainly over the fact that they are an unelected body and have no democratic right to determine the laws of the country. Although their power has been reduced over the years, many would argue that it is just not enough and some would argue that it should be abolished. In this essay I will look at the reasons why people want the Lords to be abolished however I will also look at the key functions that are carried out in the House of Lords. I will then conclude stating whether I feel the House of Lords should be abolished and if not what (if anything) should be done to reform the House of Lords. The House of Lords is argued to be undemocratic and should not play a part in the British political system. There is also the argument that we cannot claim to be a democracy while the House of Lords hold power to rule the decisions of the elected government. ...read more.

Middle

Due to these reasons the House of Lords could easily be argued to be both sexist and racist. Members of the House of Lords although are not directly paid, such, they are given a generous attendance allowance. This basically means that they are paid for turning up and not paid in correlation to their contribution. However there are some definitely good reasons for keeping the House of Lords. Firstly they play a vital role in the legislative. The House of Lords can scrutinise these bills and highlight any areas which they have any concerns with. The Lords can scrutinise the bills in much more detail than the House of Commons which means they can amend any problems that are found. They can also stop a bill from passing into law although the House of Commons can overrule this after a certain period of time has elapsed. Then there is the role of Scrutinising the work of the executive. ...read more.

Conclusion

Another reason to put forward to continue to with the House of Lords is simply to share the burden of the government more evenly. Parliament has an enormous deal of work to do, and the House of Lords currently does its fair share of it. However, the benefit of sharing the work must be balanced against the costs, particularly when conflicts between the chambers result in an increased workload for both. In this essay I have looked at the Major criticism of the House of Lords as well as the key function that are carried out by the Lords. I feel that there are some major issues relating to how democratic the Lords are and the lack of minority groups that are a part of the Lords. However I do feel that the Lords do have an essential role to play in British politics and I feel that it should not be abolished. I feel that there should be new elected peers who would be elected using proportional distribution to give a better representation in minority groups within the Lords. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Government & Politics Revision Notes

    Candidates are elected using the simple plurality (first past the post) system. The party seats are allocated using the party list system .Because of the combination of two systems it is known as a hybrid. The Additional Member system is the only system that results in two different types of representatives being elected.

  2. Draft a memorandum to the government evaluating the merits and demerits of differing reform ...

    little outside experience or understanding of the problems faced by ordinary citizens and because they are too constrained by party discipline. This could be replicated if the members of the House of Lords directly elected as proportional representation on a list system would in fact mean greater constraints and of

  1. Is There A Need For Constitutional Reform?

    Wales's experience echoed many of these tensions after 1999. First, there was anger that the leader of the Labour group and eventual First Minister, Alun Michael, was imposed so forcefully by the party's headquarters in London. Before things had even reached that stage, however, a dismal turnout of barely 50

  2. 'Britain is in desperate need of electoral reform. The FPTP system is undemocratic.' Discuss.

    There is a 'winner's bonus' which is a small increase in the votes of the winning party, translated into a certain percentage of seats which they are awarded when they become the new Government. This is demonstrated in 1983 when the Conservatives gained a one hundred seat majority on only

  1. House Of Lords Reform - What did the 1999 act reforming the lords ...

    This can be seen in the Thatcher and Major reign where the Conservatives were rejected around 100 times. If there were a majority for the conservatives in the lords, then the rejections would not have been as much but would in fact be lower.

  2. Discuss the contention that the House of Lords is irrelevant.

    This new act meant as a consequence the lords obtained greater authority through the fact the government wanted them there and are seen as less undemocratic because of this reform. This in turn had a great affect on the activities and use of power by the Lords, which made less irrelevant that they were previously.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work