• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The House of Lords, is their need for futher reform?

Extracts from this document...


The House of Lords has always been a talking point in British politics, mainly over the fact that they are an unelected body and have no democratic right to determine the laws of the country. Although their power has been reduced over the years, many would argue that it is just not enough and some would argue that it should be abolished. In this essay I will look at the reasons why people want the Lords to be abolished however I will also look at the key functions that are carried out in the House of Lords. I will then conclude stating whether I feel the House of Lords should be abolished and if not what (if anything) should be done to reform the House of Lords. The House of Lords is argued to be undemocratic and should not play a part in the British political system. There is also the argument that we cannot claim to be a democracy while the House of Lords hold power to rule the decisions of the elected government. ...read more.


Due to these reasons the House of Lords could easily be argued to be both sexist and racist. Members of the House of Lords although are not directly paid, such, they are given a generous attendance allowance. This basically means that they are paid for turning up and not paid in correlation to their contribution. However there are some definitely good reasons for keeping the House of Lords. Firstly they play a vital role in the legislative. The House of Lords can scrutinise these bills and highlight any areas which they have any concerns with. The Lords can scrutinise the bills in much more detail than the House of Commons which means they can amend any problems that are found. They can also stop a bill from passing into law although the House of Commons can overrule this after a certain period of time has elapsed. Then there is the role of Scrutinising the work of the executive. ...read more.


Another reason to put forward to continue to with the House of Lords is simply to share the burden of the government more evenly. Parliament has an enormous deal of work to do, and the House of Lords currently does its fair share of it. However, the benefit of sharing the work must be balanced against the costs, particularly when conflicts between the chambers result in an increased workload for both. In this essay I have looked at the Major criticism of the House of Lords as well as the key function that are carried out by the Lords. I feel that there are some major issues relating to how democratic the Lords are and the lack of minority groups that are a part of the Lords. However I do feel that the Lords do have an essential role to play in British politics and I feel that it should not be abolished. I feel that there should be new elected peers who would be elected using proportional distribution to give a better representation in minority groups within the Lords. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Government & Politics Revision Notes

    candidates on the lists and the order in which they appear, the closer a candidate is to the top of the list, the greater his or her chances of getting a seat. In an Open list system voters are able to vote for individual candidates and the party vote is

  2. Is There A Need For Constitutional Reform?

    of the new parliamentary buildings at Holyrood, and there was a growing sense among the Scots of the imperfection of the new institutions. Turnout was low, and the Scottish National Party, which had high hopes of exploiting devolution as a stepping stone towards independence, declined relative to its 1999 performance.

  1. 'Britain is in desperate need of electoral reform. The FPTP system is undemocratic.' Discuss.

    This is, therefore, not their true opinion and means they are going unrepresented. There is definite discrimination against such third parties as shown by these figures of the composition of the House of Commons; in 1945 there was only 10 seats held by third party members, moving to 49 in 1974 and finally 80 in 2001.

  2. House Of Lords Reform - What did the 1999 act reforming the lords ...

    This can be seen in the Thatcher and Major reign where the Conservatives were rejected around 100 times. If there were a majority for the conservatives in the lords, then the rejections would not have been as much but would in fact be lower.

  1. Draft a memorandum to the government evaluating the merits and demerits of differing reform ...

    They would hold equal power to each other member in the House, still continuing to perform the functions of the Upper House as at present. Such a method has the merit of taking into account the devolution settlement by which the United Kingdom is coming to be transformed from a unitary into a multinational state.

  2. Discuss the contention that the House of Lords is irrelevant.

    This new act meant as a consequence the lords obtained greater authority through the fact the government wanted them there and are seen as less undemocratic because of this reform. This in turn had a great affect on the activities and use of power by the Lords, which made less irrelevant that they were previously.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work