• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Increased Power of the Prime Minister

Extracts from this document...


Increased Power of the Prime Minister The duties the Prime Minister is able to perform have strengthened the role of the Prime Minister over the Cabinet. These factors include the ability to reshuffle and appoint his own Cabinet members which gives him more power over the Cabinet himself, considering he is able to choose the people who will not speak out against him. Furthermore, the PM's acts are considered under the royal prerogative, as he is appointed officially by the ruling monarch as the leader of both the government home and abroad, which has a higher power over the Cabinet. The PM is also able to make his own decisions, although usually getting help from the Cabinet, it is overall his word that is most powerful and many of his Cabinet members would back him up in any case. The factors here all involve some sort of extra power that the PM has, that the Cabinet do not. ...read more.


It is this rapid growth of PM power that means that the growth has not been in a steady straight line, but due to influence from perhaps the West (USA). Tony Blair can definitely be a past Prime Minister named to be involved in the overall development of this new PM role. His regime is always said to have been very "presidential" and often compared to the role of the US president, at the time mostly being George Bush, whom he had been very influenced by during the Iraq War. It can be argued that Blair's methods of running the country have changed the role of the PM - he developed the de-factor Prime Minister's Office which had before not existed. This is seen to be presidential as the US president also has an office of advisors that help him and the executive. Furthermore, he used a lot of advisors before he made the main decisions - another point suggesting an increased amount of power for the PM. ...read more.


to a presidential style of leader just as Bush was, especially with the events surrounding the Iraq War, where there was increased pressures on Blair's shoulders. Blair's increased use of advisors helped the increase of Blair being seen as a more presidential leader. This is due to the fact that the US President usually has a committee of advisors to advise him, which was not usually the case with the UK PM. However, Tony Blair created an office where he was advised from everything to do with the way he appeared in the media to what he should do in the Iraq War. The important thing to consider is that these were merely advisors, and whilst they had a big role in helping Blair, they were ultimately just giving him options to which he decided the overall decision from. This suggests an overall presidential style as it shows him as a more independent leader, similar to the US president traditionally is, and not the traditional PM of the UK who usually made decisions together with his Cabinet. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Comparison of the US President and British Prime Minister.

    Besides, Presidential Bills have to negotiate further hurdles in their passage through Congress, from the Rules and Majority Policy Committees, which hold great influence on the likelihood of success for the Bills proposed by the President, as they determine when they will be debated.

  2. How and why has the role of the prime minister changed over the post-1945 ...

    His/her reduced global role is thought to have arisen from; the collapse of the empire, membership of the EU, and the global economy. Coupled with these role developments is therefore also a development of power, as different roles mean different expectations upon the prime minister and therefore different powers.

  1. priministers power

    been their ability to cultivate the media, especially television, and to create an 'image' to which the electorate will respond. o The Prime Minister as party leader - The role of Prime Minister is a product of party politics since a Prime Minister owes his position to being the elected leader of the majority party.

  2. The role of the Prime Minister.

    During 1981 she gradually dismissed a number of dissenters from her Cabinet. She appointed newcomers who were more supportive of her policies and owed their promotion to her. She gained from policy successes, particularly the down-turn in inflation in 1982 then decisively, the recapture of the Falklands, the steady rise

  1. Where does the decision making power lie in the British executive: with the Prime ...

    To understand the balance we can describe the way in which the Prime Minister would go about affecting a decision in a particular department; Cabinet convention dictates that the Prime Minster would have to consult the appropriate minister and the final decision would be made in consensus with the minister.

  2. How much power does the Prime Minister really have?

    The Queen now has a mainly advisory role in government although she still performs an important ceremonial role and is a great diplomat. As the Prime Minister is normally the leader of the majority party in the House of Commons they are normally able to count upon their party whips to carry through any policy that they back.

  1. The relationship between the Prime Minister and Cabinet.

    Recent examples have included the educational blips made by Estelle Morris, the former Education Secretary, involving A-level results, Key Stage 3 results and top-up fees, and Neil Hamilton over the "Cash for Questions" and other sleaze allegations. The Exchange Rate Mechanism devaluation and exit prompted then Chancellor Nigel Lawson to

  2. Which do you consider to be the more powerful chief executive in his or ...

    In addition, the Supreme Court has the power to strike down legislation as 'unconstitutional', restricting the President's options even further. For instance, neither the President nor the Congress can ban gun ownership because the constitution's second amendment guarantees 'the right to bear arms'.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work