• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8
  9. 9
    9
  10. 10
    10
  11. 11
    11
  12. 12
    12
  13. 13
    13
  14. 14
    14
  15. 15
    15
  16. 16
    16
  17. 17
    17
  18. 18
    18
  19. 19
    19
  20. 20
    20
  21. 21
    21
  22. 22
    22
  23. 23
    23
  24. 24
    24
  25. 25
    25
  26. 26
    26
  27. 27
    27
  28. 28
    28
  29. 29
    29
  30. 30
    30
  31. 31
    31
  32. 32
    32
  33. 33
    33
  34. 34
    34
  35. 35
    35

The Institution of the European Union and Theories.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The EU and UK Business AVCE Business Task 1 A clear explanation of key underpinning economic theories relevant to the EU. The Institution of the European Union and Theories Economies of Scale, Firms operating in the European Union can benefit economies of scale which is where a firm expands and lowers costs for consumers and makes profits. Official definition is cost advantage through increasing in sale, the main advantages of this are especially being in the EU are that firm has large market to sell to, there is increased demand and sales to be made and above all more scope for large firms. Large business such as Boots can compete more effectively than a smaller business due to greater monopoly and lower unit costs which derive from economies of scale. e.g. a firm by entering the EU has access to larger market, larger potential of sales and increased output resulting in economies of scale. By increasing in size and producing more average costs are lowered and firm makes a profit. Supply & Demand The EU enables firms from member states to operate any where in the EU, there are advantages and disadvantages of this, Supply increases as there are so many firms operating so supplies increases but one can also have a disadvantage as there are so many firms operating supply has increased so prices would be lowered, in-order for firms to compete with each other. Consumers will benefit from this is cheaper products and services but some firms might find it hard to compete with low prices, or compete with major firms. Supply and demand will definitely change as Larger market, increase number of consumers, increased sales and increased output. The diagram shows that as supply increases price lowers so consumers will benefit. Consumers in return will benefit from lower prices. International trade, (trading without barriers) Free trade, the single European market benefits a firm and the economy of each member state, and the removal of trade barriers leads to reduction in business costs as well as in increasing competition and stimulating consumers and encouraging the creation of jobs and wealth. ...read more.

Middle

The main aim of the EMS was to introduce a single currency, this consisted of the Ecu- an artificial currency unit- and the exchange rate mechanism, which tied the European exchange rates together. Stage 1 of the EMS *Free movement of capital *Narrowing of ERM band *Closer co-operation between central banks *Closer co-ordination of economic policies STAGE 2 *Convergence of member states ' economic and monetary policies *Establishment of European Central Bank *Independence of national banks *Participating countries fix their exchange rates The main aim: Joining the euro could enhance both growth and employment prospects, and create an attractive area with low inflation and stability, which would increase the level of investment and create more opportunities. The EMS makes the single market more competitive as fewer restrictions and a single currency. Stage 3 *Introduction of single currency as an electronic currency *Launch of euro notes and coins 12 out of 15 countries adopted the Euro currency and gained many benefits as of this such as: Advantages *Lower costs for management of money- no currency conversation costs, will benefit firms as costs reduced *Fast transactions- no delays in arranging currency conversations *No exchange rate fluctuations, as single currency, therefore greater certainty. No need for business to use safe margins in import and exports. *Transparency of costing- easier for business to secure supplies which reduces costs. Disadvantages *Cost of conversation, new software may be needed to handle this, i.e. computers need to be updated Loading cash machines with new currency *The understanding of the new currency Effects/ the impacts of the Monetary policy Before a country could join the single currency it must meet five tests, UK has the ability to join the euro but has not joined as a results UK firms are at a disadvantage because currently most of the UK trade is with Europe and since UK has not adopted the euro its firms are at a loss. ...read more.

Conclusion

Boots spends large amounts of money finding out what the consumers in each country want and how they could be satisfied. B Recommendations on product features which should be common across the cultural groups. Boots tries to standardise its products as much as possible and not to cause conflict between consumers needs. Boots is considering standardising all its products so they meet all country laws and in the single market most of the countries have a single health and safety regulation. All ingredients used in the cosmetics products are subject to stringent European regulations guaranteeing consumer protection and the well being of the industry employees. Under the cosmetics directive, cosmetics products are required not cause any harm to human health. A safety assessment is carried out taking into the account all the ingredients used in the products. Products safety continues to be primary consideration of the cosmetics industry especially to Boots as figures show that 1 unit in every million produced results in allegations over its safety. Most of these problems are minor but Boots takes every problem and monitors the safety and consumer protection levels. By doing so Boots will be able to reduce the cost of waste, costs of testing on product safety as all EU countries would soon follow one safety scheme. If all the countries followed the same safety regulations Boots would incur less cots but no all countries have the same laws. Some safety laws are the same across the EU member states, one of this is products safety meaning the product should be safe enough for consumer use. This law is being introduced by the EU so firms have less costs and not to change product for each country, safety rules are being standardised across the EU. As a result firms will be saving huge amounts as less costs to meet each countries safety standards. C Justifications and recommendations By operating in the single market Boots has now have the ability to a to sell to over 360 million consumers. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The European Union and UK Businesses

    3 star(s)

    In view of the economic success that freer commercial exchanges brought about, the transitory term was shortened and in July 1968 all tariffs among the EEC States were abrogated. At the same time, a common tariff was established for all products coming from third countries.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent has the European Union been successful in "establishing" a coherent European ...

    The EU does not pay much attention to this kind of problems, thus in this kind of aspect, it is unsuccessful. Who cares European identity? Not everyone talks about the "European identity" every day, but every survey tries to contain the "European identity", such as the Euro barometer survey in

  1. Why did Britain join the EEC in 1973 and not in 1957?

    The Commonwealth was also in trouble and was beginning to look to new markets to trade in, some even looked to the EEC for support, Nigeria joining in 1962. Macmillan saw that the EEC could be used to boost British power and influence, but America was also pushing Britain towards

  2. To What Extent Does the EU Display a 'Democratic Deficit'?

    Finally, the EU will fulfil the liberal democratic criteria of having a constitution if it is ratified by all 25 member states - a process that is due to start very soon.

  1. The European Union (EU) has been enlarging its geographical borders in the last few ...

    Analysts portray the EU variously as (a) a system of multi-level governance, such as a multi level polity, or a mixed commonwealth, or condominio, consortio; or (b) as some for of transition, such as a partial polity or post-national entity; or (c) in globalist terms, such as cosmopolitanism.

  2. Analyse of the effects of price transparency in Europe, with particular reference to the ...

    while prices are lower in Spain, Greece, Finland and Demark, says a recent survey by the European Commission. One of the largest difference in pricing was for a Fiat Seicento which cost �4,893 in Spain but was 63% more expensive at �7,975 in the UK.

  1. What does citizenship mean in the European context?

    maladministration of, say, some aspects covered in Pillar 3, and, in the second place, that one could hardly qualify these two rights as specific citizens' right for, after all, appropriately, they belong not only to citizens, but, in the language of the provision itself, to any natural or legal person

  2. Managing Work Team Conflict: Assessment and Preventative Strategies

    achieved, energy is diverted from the pressing issue or activity, and team or individual morale is compromised (Capozzoli, 1995). Moreover, this conflict is considered disruptive because it can result in greater indecisiveness, increased polarity, reduced cohesiveness and consensus, while promoting hostility, distrust, cynicism, apathy, and disengagement among team members (Amason, 1996; Amason et al., 1995; Eisenhardt et al., 1997).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work