• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Palestinian Liberation Organisation.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Palestinian Liberation Organisation "Source A suggests that power can be increased through violent methods. Study sources A-C. How accurate is the interpretation described in source A when applied to the activities of the PLO since 1960?" This second part of the coursework will focus on the Palestinian Liberation Organisation, who they were, their activities and what they called for. The sources will also be analysed, and how precise source A is when functioned to the PLO will also be mentioned. The question of peace in the Middle East was complicated by the plight of the Palestinian refugees. Neighbouring Arab States did not want Palestinians to settle in their country as everlasting citizens. Instead these refugees were placed in refugee camps where conditions were of abject poverty. The UN tried to persuade Israel to allow them to return, but a few of these who had done so, had carried out attacks on the Jewish people and so was ineffective. In 1949, the UN Relief Works Agency (UNRWA) began to look after the refugee camps. Many Arab countries used the state of the refugee camps as a good propaganda weapon. ...read more.

Middle

The world watched on Television everyday and sympathy for the Israelis soon diminished. The PLO were forced out of Lebanon and moved to Tunisia. After leaving Lebanon Arafat was forced to re-think his methods. He wanted a compromise with Israel. However, he had to be extremely cautious to avoid appearing as a traitor to the rest of the Arab world. The powerful USA refused to deal with the PLO until it agreed to: - publicly rejecting the use of terrorism, recognising Israel, which meant to accept it's right to live, and also to accept the ideas behind Resolution 242 which stated that there could be an exchange of land for peace. In return to agreeing to these concessions the PLO would be allowed to negotiate which might lead to Palestinian control of the West Bank and Gaza. Jordan acted as a mediator in talks between the PLO and USA, however this came to nothing due to divisions amongst the PLO itself. In 1987 Palestinian people in the West Bank and Gaza began an uprising against the Israelis known as the 'Intifada'. The Intifada convinced Arafat that the time was right for the PLO to take control of the West Bank and Gaza as a Palestinian mini - state. ...read more.

Conclusion

The activities of the PLO included the hijacking of five aircraft and three of them were taken to an old RAF airstrip at Dawson's Field in Jordan. The PLO then blew up these aircraft which shocked the whole world. The actions of the PLO concerned the King of Jordan, King Hussein, very much as the three aircrafts were blew up in his country. He decided that the PLO should be cleaned from Jordan. After many days of fighting Arafat and the PLO were pushed out of Lebanon where they set up their new headquarters. For decades the world had not said if they were right or wrong in their doings. After the hijacking it has gained them huge publicity. The PLO mainly did these activities to gain the attention of and get noticed by. The PLO wanted to be noticed by the politics, again this refers to source 'A'. In conclusion, the PLO were terrorists in the early years, exactly in accordance with source 'A'. However soon later Arafat agreed to reject the use of terrorism and accepting Israel's right to exist and the terrorist attacks were soon given up. On the other hand groups such as the Hamas still exist who do not recognise Israel's right to exist. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Middle east section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Middle east essays

  1. Can terrorism ever be a legitimate and effective means of pursuing political goals?

    and the Sicari, Jewish groups during the time of the Roman occupation of the Middle East. They too favored selecting individuals victims, often Romans or the Jews who collaborated with them. These attacks were less about scale and more about sending a message to the Roman ruler as the attacks

  2. Assess the effectiveness of the Arab and Israeli peace initiatives from the 1970s to ...

    In Guyatt book The Absence of Peace, he says how if it weren't for the Oslo accord, our perception of an "absurdity" (171) Palestinians would exist. He continued on saying that we take back what we "retreat from what happened to what many happen in the future, we have the

  1. Terrorism. What is terrorism? 2. Why do terrorists ...

    as publicity, appear bigger, kidnapping, short term aim and a "cleansing force" were all tactics used in the Munich Massacre. However, as long as the aims of the terrorists are different their tactics will be in some ways, different and similar to other terrorist attacks.

  2. The Lebanon Civil War: Syria’s Role in Lebanon

    And they simply couldn't make acceptable convention. Something, which was absolutely true, was that suffering becomes reality and averyday life for the Lebanon's people. In that situation it wasn't important to which religion or political party they were belonged. They all suffered.

  1. Can Terrorism Be Stopped?

    "Non-violent action is a generic term covering dozens of specific methods of protest, non-co operation, and intervention, in all of which activists conduct the conflict by doing or refusing to do certain things without using physical violence...It is not and inaction.

  2. Why is it difficult to keep peace talks going in the Middle East?

    It left a large number of Palestinian Arabs as second class citizens in an alien state. 4) It drove the Palestinians to form their own resistance organisations dedicated to opposing the Israelis by any means possible, including terrorism 5)

  1. The role of International law in regards to The Palestinian Dilemma.

    This relates to the Palestinian territories seized in 1948 as well as to those occupied in 1967.19 Israel's status in those territories is that of a "belligerent occupant." All measures undertaken by the occupying power to change the status of the territories, including the occupation of Jerusalem, are then invalid.

  2. The Syrian Uprising

    It has lost every shred of its legitimacy and is only able to maintain its unity thanks to an oppressive use of its security and military forces. Scenario 2: The second scenario is that the uprising manages to topple the regime.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work