• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Parliamentary Reform and Redistribution Act of 1884 - 1885.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Parliamentary Reform and Redistribution Act of 1884 - 1885 The two acts of Parliament, the Reform Act of 1884 and the Redistribution Act of 1885, which followed, could be seen as the forefront of the Labour Parties development from the 1800's. The two Acts would radically change and reform the British Political System in years to come by introducing , a dominant party of the peoples needs that would deeply upset the rule of 'traditional conservatism' that had been the basis of the Political System for years prior to Labours development. The 1884 Parliamentary Reform Act The 1884 Parliamentary Reform Bill was in fact spured on by the 1867 Parliamentary Reform Act, under Disrali, which saw the male working class members gain the right to vote in the major towns, yet not in the counties in England. The Liberal Party Leader, a Mr. William Gladstone saw this, along with many members of his party, as unequal and against there policy of individual freedom. However the Conservative Leader , Lord Salisbury opposed this, and due to the dominance of the Conservative Tradition in Parliament viewed it as an attack on the Tories power and strength in the rural constituencies. However in 1884, Gladstone refused to be beaten, it is perhaps at this time it can be said that it was the turning point in the British Political System. William Gladstone introduced a proposal that would give the entire working class male the right to vote all over the country thus highlighting the Liberal heart of Gladstone. ...read more.

Middle

That outline as regards the industrial situation was given me by reading Hyndman's England for All. Later on in the same year I one evening looked in at a committee meeting of the Social Democratic Federation in Westminster Bridge Road. It was in the basement of one of one of those big buildings facing the House of Commons that I found a group of conspirators sitting. There was Hyndman, occupying the chair, and with him round the table, William Morris, John Burns, H. H. Champion, J. L. Joynes, Herbert Burrows, and others. Source -Edward Carpenter joined the Social Democratic Federation in 1883. http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/Psocial.htm This source highlights the views of the members of the Social Democratic Party at the begging of its era. The Social Democratic Party, the Federation amalgamated into the Independent Labour Party February of 1900. The Fabian Society in October 1883 Edith Nesbit and Hubert Bland decided to form a socialist debating group with their Quaker friend Edward Pease. They were also joined by Havelock Ellis and Frank Podmore and in January 1884 they decided to call themselves the Fabian Society. Podmore suggested that the group should be named after the Roman General, Quintus Fabius Maximus, who advocated the weakening the opposition by harassing operations rather than becoming involved in pitched battles. The Fabians believed that capitalism had created an unjust and inefficient society. They agreed that the ultimate aim of the group should be to reconstruct 'society in accordance with the highest moral possibilities'. ...read more.

Conclusion

Later that year the LRC decided to change its name to the Labour Party. Socialists do not propose by a single Act of Parliament, nor by a sudden revolution, to put all men on an equality, and compel them to remain so. Socialism is not a wild dream of a happy land, where the apples will drop off the trees into our open mouths, the fish come out ot the rivers and fry themselves for dinner, and the looms turn out ready-made suits of velvet with gold buttons, without the trouble of coaling the engine. Neither is it a dream of a nation of stained-glass angels, who always love their neighbours better than themselves, and who never need to work unless they wish. Socialism is a scientific scheme of national organization, entirely wise, just, and practical. It is a kind of national cooperation. Its programme consists, essentially, of one demand, that the land, and all other instruments of production and exchange, shall be the common property of the nation, and shall be used and managed by the nation for the nation. Source - Robert Blatchford, Merrie England (1894) From the 20TH Century Mind Conclusion It is possible to say that the almalgamtion of the Socialist movements couple with the collapse of the attempts of the Liberal Party , with the Independent Labour Party saw the final and most important creation of the socialist movement in Britain the Labour Representaion Committee. General Election Total Votes % of total votes MPs Elected 1900 62,698 1.3 2 1906 321,663 4.8 29 1910 (Jan) 505,657 7.0 40 1910 (Dec) 371,802 6.4 42 Source - http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/Plabour.htm ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Compare the views about the nature and development of Carl Rogers and George Kelly. ...

    He was first and foremost a therapist, with an abiding respect for the dignity of persons and an interest in persons as subjects rather than objects (Kirschenbaum, 2004). If this client suffers from what Rogers believes as inadequate conditions of worth, occurring when significant others in the person's world provide

  2. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    Evidence of this can be seen in the necessity by the UN to create two human right covenants; The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, and The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. The reason that Locke and people down the ages have problems in using the

  1. An analysis of the Marxist Perspective on Religion

    What became apparent after a few years was that power stemmed from the top, just like under the Tsars. For the average Russian the repression continued. After Lenin's death in the late 1920's, Josef Stalin took control of Russia. It was under Stalin's command that the terrible political purges in the 1930's took place.

  2. Is the labour party a socialist party.

    The party claims that its policy is to develop a society 'where we live together, freely, in a spirit of solidarity, tolerance and respect and a society where the rights we enjoy reflect the duties we owe'. This policy encourages capitalism a lot more than socialism does.

  1. An analysis of the Marxist perspective on religion

    for them to practice religion as they would have no need to "dull the pain of oppression". Furthermore, if religion really is the form of propaganda that seeks to hide the reality of exploitation and oppression within society then it seems ridiculous to suppose the bourgeoisie would believe their own propaganda.

  2. Explain why the Liberals were electorally so successful so often, 1868-85?

    However first and foremost it is crucial to consider the state of the economy, as it is this prevailing situation that should be noted as being the basis for opinion for the majority of the electorate. The 1880's had seen a prolonged decrease of agricultural prices in concurrence with a

  1. Notes on John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

    away to ensure other people their positive rights, so you cannot grant those positive rights in the first place. Of course, the government will be allowed to take money from citizen to provide the basic services of society such as civil protection, national defense, and other essential services - and

  2. How democratic was Britain by 1918?

    Activities such as hiring carriages for those going to polling stations to vote for them was classed as an offence. This movement was far more democratic. There was less based on money and more based on what was said by the candidates.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work