• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Part Played By Yasser Arafat In The Move Towards a Palestinian State.

Extracts from this document...


The Part Played By Yasser Arafat In The Move Towards a Palestinian State. Yasser Arafat was born into a Palestinian family in Egypt in 1929. Even in his early life he began fighting from age eighteen onwards, first the British, then the Israelis. At the age of thirty he founded a magazine in 1959 which aimed to create and identity for the Palestinians living in camps. This was a good way of giving the people publicity and also shows that his original motives when he was young were good. As time went on, Arafat's actions began to contradict his early good intentions as he set up Al-Fatah, a guerrilla movement that set up guerrilla cells to launch attacks into Israel. This already made him look like more of a terrorist than a freedom-fighter. In 1968 Arafat lost a war, his second major defeat after a battle lost in 1948. Despite this set-back in Arafat's campaign, he gained many new supporters who believed in what he was doing. ...read more.


In 1982 Israel attacked the Lebanon and Arafat fled. His leadership was weak but the upshot of the attacks was support gained from various parties. In 1987 Arafat seemed to change his tactics once more, making him look all the more fickle and unstable. He announced Intifada and at last respected the right for Israel to exist and renounced terror. At the time this showed that Arafat wanted to gain international respect and again would allow discussion, the possibility of peace and a move towards a Palestinian state. When the Gulf war began in 1990, Arafat made the massive mistake of siding with Saddam Hussein, a hated man who would gain Arafat no support. Fortunately, Hussein's influence on Arafat was not too extreme and Arafat continued to stick by peaceful words. Having agreed to begin the peace process, secret talks in Norway went on followed by a peace accord with Rabin. Palestine gained some authority in parts of the west bank and the Gaza strip. ...read more.


As Hamas continued suicide bombing, Sharon, a violent extremist leader, launched attacks into Palestine cities and captured Arafat prisoner. This once again made people feel sorry for him but it was becoming apparent that sympathy was getting him no where in the fight for a Palestinian state. On the 24th June President Bush calls for a change in leadership from Arafat. It had become the general opinion that Arafat's influence was useless. In conclusion Yasser Arafat has tried every tactic and almost always failed. But in terms of peace keeping he has generally done well, particularly by making the controversial decision of declining Clinton's offer because extremists from both sides would have been likely to react violently. His involvement with Camp David in 1978 and the Oslo Accords is progress that cannot be denied. Arafat must get some credit for this but without the help and encouragement of America who brokered the talks. If Arafat's claims are true; that he has no control over Hamas then Arafat has done as much as he can. Alex Hawthorne 11S 18 November 2002 History Coursework Mrs Allan ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Middle east section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Middle east essays

  1. Beliefs - "One man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter."

    This lyric is not the only heart hitting lyric, but really does make you think of the effects terrorism is having. This is one of the reasons the song was written. To hit the heart, and make people realise how important our world is.

  2. Paper II Media Portrayal of Yasser Arafat and the Palestinian leadership.

    With the retirement of Abbas, who symbolised the diplomatic connection between the Israeli government and the Palestinian authority, the peace process suffered a heavy setback. 2. The "Oslo Declaration of Principles on interim self-government arrangements" is the result of negotiations of Yasser Arafat and Jizhak Rabin.

  1. Terrorism. What is terrorism? 2. Why do terrorists ...

    Terrorism has been used in the hope of increasing government repression, or an overreaction or retaliation. The tactic is to provoke a reaction that will alienate the population from the government. One example of this was the 9/11 attacks on the US, this provoked the US government to start their "War on Terrorism."

  2. The Lebanon Civil War: Syria’s Role in Lebanon

    It seemed that they were not so much satisfied with the fact that these nations wished be thoroughly free, free in first place from the foreign interests. They wished to have countries, which will exist on the world map. Lebanon is really very small but in the some word very "big" country.

  1. British policy towards Palestine in the creation of Israel, one must carefully analyze British ...

    It also made the suggestion that further Jewish immigration should be restricted to 12,000 per year. The Peel Report marked a significant departure in British policy. The 1939 White Paper, issued on May 17, 1939, rejected, in essence, the Peel Commission's partition plan on the grounds that it was not feasible.

  2. U.S Policy Options Towards Iran's Nuclear Programs

    a certain lack of international support for an invasion by a military already stretched to the breaking point in Iraq. Secondly, as illustrated by the Iraq quagmire, it is doubtful that the U.S can occupy Iran and pave the way for a Western-style democratic regime, if indeed the U.S had

  1. Why is it difficult to keep peace talks going in the Middle East?

    However other reasons for wanting the land are: 1) The Jewish people did not have their own state dispora and persecution in other countries led to increased feeling of nationalism and Zionism among Jews. Palestinians lost the land (six days war, 1948 war)

  2. Nuclear proliferation in Iran

    If Iran does come out in the near future and admit to proliferating nuclear weapons there should be no doubt that these reasons listed above contributed to the start of such an action.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work