• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The prospect of voting reform in British politics.

Free essay example:

The prospect of voting reform in British politics.

British general elections are fought under a plurality voting system where the party with the largest share of the vote in each constituency is declared the outright winner. This has advantages and disadvantages, and has long been the subject of extensive debate regarding claims that it locks smaller parties out of power and discourages voter participation by enforcing a system where many people feel that their vote is discounted. Although this 'first past the post' voting system has been in place for many years in Britain, there has recently been renewed pressure for change, and in 2011 there is expected to be a referendum on possible new voting systems, the outcome of which could dramatically reshape the British political scene.

Under the present system, the party with a majority takes an outright victory. For example, provided a single party in parliament has an overall majority of at least one seat, it has the right to form a government and the other parties will be in opposition. The potential unfairness of this situation is best demonstrated at the constituency level: if a Conservative MP is elected with 51% of the vote to 49% for a Labour candidate, the Conservatives will win that constituency and the 49% who voted Labour will effectively be denied representation based on their choice. Some political reformers argue that a fairer system should be implemented, which would see the parties share the rewards of the vote along the lines of their actual percentage count.

Much of the debate over Britain's electoral system focuses on the possibility of implementing proportional representation, a system where voters could choose a second and third choice candidate (Leach, 2006). This would mean that calculations could be carried out based on voters' ability to rank the candidates in order of preference. Although more complicated than the current system, this would allow voters to feel that their votes were being taken into greater account. In the run-up to the 2010 general election, Gordon Brown suggested that proportional representation should be implemented, since it "means that each elected MP will have the chance to be elected with much broader support from their constituency, not just those who picked them as their first choice" (BBC, 2010).

However, Brown lost that election and a new Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition government took power. Part of this coalition involved a commitment to a referendum on voting reform, with the Conservatives against change and the Liberal Democrats pushing for a 'yes' vote on plans to switch from a majoritarian to a proportional representation system. The Labour party is also expected to be against change. If voted through, these changes to the British electoral system would be the first such changes for many years.

A majoritarian system such as the one currently in place in the UK naturally emphasises the gains of the larger parties, who gain a disproportionately large share of the vote and over time extend their natural advantage even further. For example, in the 2005 UK general election the dominant Labour and Conservative parties received 67.6% of the total vote between them, but won 85.9% of seats in parliament. For the third-placed party, the Liberal Democrats, the situation was particularly poor: they received 22.1% of the vote but only 9.6% of the seats.

Critics of this system argue that it is totally unfair, concentrates power in the hands of a two-party system, and marginalises minority parties in a way that makes it virtually impossible for them to grow and challenge the dominant parties. For this reason, Labour and the Conservatives have traditionally been unenthusiastic about changing this system, while the Liberal Democrats have pushed for reform.

The debate over voting reform takes place against a backdrop of dwindling voter participation at general elections. Most political analysts stress that keeping voter numbers up should be a priority (Kavanagh, Richard, Geddes and Smith, 2006), and supporters of electoral reform believe that proportional representation would encourage people to believe that their vote would not simply be wasted. However others argue that getting people to engage with politics is far more complex and that most people are unengaged not because of the specifics of the voting system but because they do not have faith in politicians.

No voting system is perfect and there will also have to be some compromises. However proportional representation seems to offer the best return based on the smallest compromise, and the current majoritarian system in place in Britain not only cements the power of the main two parties but also makes people believe that their votes do not count. Because of these fundamental flaws, it would seem to be a positive move if the British system were to be changed and a new way of determining the winner of general elections could be found.


BBC. Gordon Brown outlines plans to reform UK voting system. 2010. Available online from: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8492622.stm [Accessed on November 11th 2010].

Kavanagh, Dennis and Richard, David and Geddes, Andrew and Smith, Martin. British politics. Oxford, OUP, 2006.

Leach, Robert. British politics. Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.

> Free essay filed in: Politics on December 2nd 2010.

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related AS and A Level Politics Skills and Knowledge Essays

See our best essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Government & Politics Revision Notes

    This in turn affects how the media cover politics and therefore how the public see it. However the UK is democratic in the sense that a number of parties compete for power, giving the public a choice of candidates & manifesto's at election time.

  2. Democracy and Voting

    disposition are forever forming associations" Alexis de Tocqueville We are SOCIAL BEINGS � However, a trend of declining social participation has been identified Robert Putnam (Bowling Alone 2000) Does it matter that Politics is in decline? � Edmund Burke; "It is necessary only for the good man to do nothing

  1. What is the main reason for the loss of faith and interest in our ...

    Her proposal seems to be a good solution at first; however when I started to think about the answers that she'd given in more detail I began to wonder. If the scrutinizing of the acts is not with the view to change them, but just to see if they are working or not, then why do it at all?

  2. Constitution and Politics

    Tradition: referendum) and unitary (Central government makes all the rules for the UK, devolution: naah mate, you still got a BOSS). Rule of law (no one is above the law), monarch: head of government and cannot act independently of government Main elements: 1.

  1. "Constitutional reform had gone too far, or not far enough?" Discuss

    Although the Liberal Democrats agree with devolution, many would like to take it a step further and go federal. This is why the Liberal Democrats believe that constitutional reform has not gone far enough when it comes to devolution, as a crossover between devolution and federalism is not yet present.

  2. Democracy and the British Voting System.

    A main issue this may provoke is the ?tyranny of the majority?, whereby the minority are totally overshadowed by the majority/popular vote and consequently unaccounted for. Finally, although it is mostly unlikely, an MP can ignore his constituents and ultimately make unpopular decisions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work