• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The senate is too powerful and the House of Lords is too weak" - Consider this view of the upper chambers of the U.S. congress and the U.K Parliament.

Extracts from this document...


"The senate is too powerful and the House of Lords is too weak". Consider this view of the upper chambers of the U.S. congress and the U.K Parliament. When the U.K Parliament was first instated it was the House of Lords that predominantly had all the large majority of power and was a lot more influential that the House of Commons, this role has in recent years has switched and it is now the House of Commons that has the majority of the power, this took place because of the Act of Parliament of 1911, which to a large degree reverted the two roles, It should also be remembered that Parliament has been around as long as the Monarchy has as well, but as before this was when the House of Lords and the Majority of the Lords held the majority of the power in the Country. Congress was set up in the Late 18th Century and therefore is a much more modern establishment, it was set up too keep checks and ...read more.


amendment to the American Constitution for the powers of the senate which now includes the right to taxation and income which was amendment XVI. The senate and the House of Lord also differs in many different ways, firstly and foremost the Senate is elected from the Inhabitants of each different state, so each different state elects who it wants to be there senators, this differs fro the House of Lords because the House of Lords is not elected, 92seats are inherited seats and the rest are people who have earned the title of Lord or Lourdes and are not where they are because the people want the there, so consequently they do have a small amount of Power but not as much as the comparison between Senate and the House of Lords because the Hose of Lords is NOT elected and not selected by the people, it is a position awarded to them or earned by them not given to them by the people who they should be representing. ...read more.


And on top of that they can never delay or even hinder the passing a money bill that lies completely in the hands of the House of Commons. The 689 peers (92 heredity and 597 life peers) have very little power but the Senate plays a big role in stopping, delaying and opposing bills etc. In relation the House of Lords does have less power than the Senate but there are reasons for that the first being that the Lords is not elected by the people where the senate is and secondly the American system is set up differently to our system and therefore needs to be different. So in conclusion yes the Senate does hold and have more power than that of the House of Lords but in reality it should because it is elected by the people and is used as a check and balance, if The House of Lords had elected members then it really should have the same amount of power and stopping power that the Senate does in America. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Evaluate the claim that the Senate is far more powerful than the House of ...

    3 star(s)

    and sub-committees exceeds the number of majority members, meaning that each majority member chairs at least one subcommittee/ committee and can also allow minority part senators to chair a committee. Senators are also a lot more likely to hold a leadership position e.g.

  2. How well does the US Constitution Work

    Amendments 19 to 26 gave women the right to vote in 1920 and the voting age was lowered to 18 in 1971. In relation to my view whether the US Constitution works in this era, I recognize the contrasting views of others.

  1. Comparison of US and UK Constitution

    All institutions are accountable to someone else. Executive power is given to the President, legislative power to Congress and judicial power to the federal courts headed by the Supreme Court. (Almond et al, op cit, pp 746) The President has the power of appointment but the Senate must approve these appointments.

  2. Assess the power and significance of congress.

    Recently the House tried to impeach President Clinton, but it was acquitted by the Senate in 1999. These powers show control and restrictions on the president and offer congress power in domestic issues and foreign. The president of the United States of America is seen as the most powerful man on Earth by almost all foreign countries.

  1. Outline the differences between the electoral systems for the US Presidency, the US Senate ...

    In the case of no majority being reached by a single candidate, the vote is then referred to the House of Representatives to decide on the Presidency, with delegates from each state receiving one vote between them. The reasons for the framers of the constitution deciding on the Electoral College system of choosing the President were various.

  2. Where Power Lies in Congress

    The Senate choosing the Vice-President) in an electoral tie, and furthermore the House is the only chamber which can actually bring about the removal of the Executive in the first place via impeachment. The House is also known for a much stronger party unity, for example the existence of the House Rules Committee which symbolises this.

  1. How is Britain's constitution changing in the 21st century?

    Open government is what the government chooses to reveal to the general public, whereas Freedom of Information sees the public getting to know all it satisfies. Flinders' investigation into the prospective F.O.I. legislation is very thorough, and considers Clarks' explorations against the subsequent measures proposed by Straw.

  2. Constitutional Comparison

    For example, thexercises the Royal Prerogative, such as declaring war, but it has become a convention of constitution. Previously to this, it was accepted that the Queen/King at the time alone could exercise these powers, and it was recognised as commonplace for them to do so.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work