• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The senate is too powerful and the House of Lords is too weak" - Consider this view of the upper chambers of the U.S. congress and the U.K Parliament.

Extracts from this document...


"The senate is too powerful and the House of Lords is too weak". Consider this view of the upper chambers of the U.S. congress and the U.K Parliament. When the U.K Parliament was first instated it was the House of Lords that predominantly had all the large majority of power and was a lot more influential that the House of Commons, this role has in recent years has switched and it is now the House of Commons that has the majority of the power, this took place because of the Act of Parliament of 1911, which to a large degree reverted the two roles, It should also be remembered that Parliament has been around as long as the Monarchy has as well, but as before this was when the House of Lords and the Majority of the Lords held the majority of the power in the Country. Congress was set up in the Late 18th Century and therefore is a much more modern establishment, it was set up too keep checks and ...read more.


amendment to the American Constitution for the powers of the senate which now includes the right to taxation and income which was amendment XVI. The senate and the House of Lord also differs in many different ways, firstly and foremost the Senate is elected from the Inhabitants of each different state, so each different state elects who it wants to be there senators, this differs fro the House of Lords because the House of Lords is not elected, 92seats are inherited seats and the rest are people who have earned the title of Lord or Lourdes and are not where they are because the people want the there, so consequently they do have a small amount of Power but not as much as the comparison between Senate and the House of Lords because the Hose of Lords is NOT elected and not selected by the people, it is a position awarded to them or earned by them not given to them by the people who they should be representing. ...read more.


And on top of that they can never delay or even hinder the passing a money bill that lies completely in the hands of the House of Commons. The 689 peers (92 heredity and 597 life peers) have very little power but the Senate plays a big role in stopping, delaying and opposing bills etc. In relation the House of Lords does have less power than the Senate but there are reasons for that the first being that the Lords is not elected by the people where the senate is and secondly the American system is set up differently to our system and therefore needs to be different. So in conclusion yes the Senate does hold and have more power than that of the House of Lords but in reality it should because it is elected by the people and is used as a check and balance, if The House of Lords had elected members then it really should have the same amount of power and stopping power that the Senate does in America. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Evaluate the claim that the Senate is far more powerful than the House of ...

    3 star(s)

    and sub-committees exceeds the number of majority members, meaning that each majority member chairs at least one subcommittee/ committee and can also allow minority part senators to chair a committee. Senators are also a lot more likely to hold a leadership position e.g.

  2. How well does the US Constitution Work

    With respect to Article 1 in relation to checks and Balances, all actions of the President would be subjected to scrutiny by congress and the senate. Furthermore Congress would be subjected to regular review, with clear terms of office and particulars defined.

  1. Explain the Major Similarities and Differences between the Two Chambers of the US Congress.

    There is no property qualification. Neither House is subject to recall, and there is no limit on the number of terms that any member of either House can serve. The powers and duties of the House of Representatives and Senate are, nonetheless, very different.

  2. How is Britain's constitution changing in the 21st century?

    The future of the Lords is a concern, and Blair's system of appointments is not satisfactory. Hazell et al's. research has identified that public opinion polls show overwhelming support for an elected second chamber, in direct contention to the Labour government who don't want their power in the Commons challenged (Hazell et al., 2001, 198).

  1. Assess the power and significance of congress.

    Recently the House tried to impeach President Clinton, but it was acquitted by the Senate in 1999. These powers show control and restrictions on the president and offer congress power in domestic issues and foreign. The president of the United States of America is seen as the most powerful man on Earth by almost all foreign countries.

  2. In what ways and why are the committees of the US Congress so much ...

    Finally select or special committees can be formed by either house. Similarly to the Standing committees in Congress the standing committees in the house of commons main role is to consider possible amendments of legislation during its passage through the house.

  1. Overpaid and Underworked: Plight of the Canadian Senate

    By contrast, the Canadian Senate is the exact opposite. Rather than embracing it's power as a formidable source of policy making, the Senate abdicates its power to the cabinet and the House of Commons. It is often concluded that the Senate serves as a rubber stamp of approval for legislations passed by the House of Commons.

  2. Discuss the view that the presidency is not a powerful office

    The other ?side? of the presidencies powers are those inherent powers, those which are not written in the constitution and as with the constitutional powers, there are examples which could suggest the presidency as a powerful office when exercising these powers.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work