• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The system of government in the United Kingdom (UK) is very different to many other countries.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The system of government in the United Kingdom (UK) is very different to many other countries. There are only a few other countries besides the UK (New Zealand and Israel are the others) which do not have a 'written' constitution. Due to this lack of a written document the UK looks for its sources of constitution in (amongst other things) conventions. First, it may be necessary to define what we mean when we say that the UK does not have as such, a written constitution and whether this means that the UK has a constitution at all. This type of approach is known as abstract (as opposed to concrete) and many have attempted to define and justify that despite this the UK still has a constitution despite it not being in a written form. One such definition is that a constitution is: 'the whole system of government of a country, the collection of rules which establish and regulate or govern the government.'1 Judging from this definition it would appear that the UK does have a constitution, as a constitution does not necessarily have to be in a written form. ...read more.

Middle

take on an even greater significance. This is because in the absence of any 'hard and fast' rules on how the UK should be governed they act as the 'next best thing'. One such convention is the convention of Ministerial Responsibility. There are two types of Ministerial Responsibility - collective and individual - for the purposes of this essay Individual Ministerial Responsibility will be looked at in depth. The convention of Ministerial Responsibility is central to the government as it re-enforces that ministers are expected to have 'honesty and incorruptibility'4 and the fact that ministers in addition to the government are also accountable to the general public. The convention of Individual Ministerial Responsibility is a very important (if complex) one. This is down to the fact that there are various factors which govern this convention, such as media involvement, the Prime Minister and the ministers' constituency. Individual Ministerial Responsibility basically means that a minister is accountable (to Parliament) not only for his/her personal conduct but also for the conduct of their department and any civil servants under their 'control'. A more precise definition was provided by Lord Morrison: '...a minister is accountable to Parliament for anything he or his department does or for anything he has the power to do, whether he does it or not. ...read more.

Conclusion

Another aspect of conventions (particularly this one) is whether they limit State power. On the one hand, this convention makes ministers accountable to Parliament and to the general public who hold the 'real' power i.e. they decide who is in government. Also, it makes may make ministers 'think before they act' as this convention provides boundaries (if slightly blurred) as to what the State deems acceptable behaviour although these boundaries can be overcome if you have the support of the Prime Minister. However, on the other hand, only the Prime Minister can appoint and dismiss ministers, not the Queen who is the Head of (the) State, so this limits the power of the State quite considerable. In conclusion, there are two sides of the argument as to whether the convention of Individual Ministerial Responsibility but also (conventions in general) do act to limit State power. Ultimately, though it is not important that conventions limit State power what is far more important is that conventions 'work' (which they do) and do not undermine already established (legal) rules. In addition, conventions fill the 'political lacuna' left by the fact that the UK does not have a formal written constitution. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Government & Politics Revision Notes

    Its democratic as it allows political participation. Criticisms of the UK's Democracy > The Westminster voting system- The first past the post system used for elections to the House of Commons has been criticized for distorting electoral practices and creating a system of plurality rule in which governments win fewer than half of the votes cast.

  2. How, and with what success, have governments attempted to improve the provision of health ...

    However many public sector unions, however, remained sceptical - and are particularly concerned about the extension of the private sector into new areas like schools and hospitals which had traditionally been publicly run. Currently private clinics such as Independent Sector Treatment Centres (ISTC's)

  1. priministers power

    Tory backbench MP's rallied round their leader in a crucial confidence motion in the Commons. * Modern elections have enhanced the status of the party leader - leaders have come to embody their parties in the eyes of the electorate.

  2. Is nationalism in the UK reactionary or progreesive??

    Wales was politically subject to the English crown from the 13th century, being formally united with England in 1536; the Welsh had little say in the process of absorption under English rule. Ireland was more erratically controlled by the English monarchy from the 12th century but, unlike Britain, remained obstinately

  1. Does the UK have a Prime Ministerial government?

    to make his own personal policy which was shown in the defeat he suffered over the gurka bill in 2008 which once again shows the restraint that public support and parliamentary majority has on a Prime Ministers power. Which shows the PM not to be an all dominant figure in

  2. What does it take to change the United Kingdoms constitution?

    Within the United Kingdom the only period that had political circumstances that required an enactment of a code of rules covering the whole of government was between 1653 and 1660 when the country was governed under Cromwell's 'instrument of government'.

  1. Unit 1 - Example of Evaluations

    Document Evaluation What was good about it and what worked well There were a lot of things on my poster which I felt worked well; one of these was the clear presentation and its concise information. The information is minimal yet gets all the main points across, so it is not seen by the reader as being overpowering.

  2. What is the main reason for the loss of faith and interest in our ...

    of resources, and the inability to know what's going on, as it may have been in the past when all of these facilities and services weren't in place. The problem may not be where to get the information, but what information is being received.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work