• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
Page
  1. 1
    1
  2. 2
    2
  3. 3
    3
  4. 4
    4
  5. 5
    5
  6. 6
    6
  7. 7
    7
  8. 8
    8

The system of government in the United Kingdom (UK) is very different to many other countries.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The system of government in the United Kingdom (UK) is very different to many other countries. There are only a few other countries besides the UK (New Zealand and Israel are the others) which do not have a 'written' constitution. Due to this lack of a written document the UK looks for its sources of constitution in (amongst other things) conventions. First, it may be necessary to define what we mean when we say that the UK does not have as such, a written constitution and whether this means that the UK has a constitution at all. This type of approach is known as abstract (as opposed to concrete) and many have attempted to define and justify that despite this the UK still has a constitution despite it not being in a written form. One such definition is that a constitution is: 'the whole system of government of a country, the collection of rules which establish and regulate or govern the government.'1 Judging from this definition it would appear that the UK does have a constitution, as a constitution does not necessarily have to be in a written form. ...read more.

Middle

take on an even greater significance. This is because in the absence of any 'hard and fast' rules on how the UK should be governed they act as the 'next best thing'. One such convention is the convention of Ministerial Responsibility. There are two types of Ministerial Responsibility - collective and individual - for the purposes of this essay Individual Ministerial Responsibility will be looked at in depth. The convention of Ministerial Responsibility is central to the government as it re-enforces that ministers are expected to have 'honesty and incorruptibility'4 and the fact that ministers in addition to the government are also accountable to the general public. The convention of Individual Ministerial Responsibility is a very important (if complex) one. This is down to the fact that there are various factors which govern this convention, such as media involvement, the Prime Minister and the ministers' constituency. Individual Ministerial Responsibility basically means that a minister is accountable (to Parliament) not only for his/her personal conduct but also for the conduct of their department and any civil servants under their 'control'. A more precise definition was provided by Lord Morrison: '...a minister is accountable to Parliament for anything he or his department does or for anything he has the power to do, whether he does it or not. ...read more.

Conclusion

Another aspect of conventions (particularly this one) is whether they limit State power. On the one hand, this convention makes ministers accountable to Parliament and to the general public who hold the 'real' power i.e. they decide who is in government. Also, it makes may make ministers 'think before they act' as this convention provides boundaries (if slightly blurred) as to what the State deems acceptable behaviour although these boundaries can be overcome if you have the support of the Prime Minister. However, on the other hand, only the Prime Minister can appoint and dismiss ministers, not the Queen who is the Head of (the) State, so this limits the power of the State quite considerable. In conclusion, there are two sides of the argument as to whether the convention of Individual Ministerial Responsibility but also (conventions in general) do act to limit State power. Ultimately, though it is not important that conventions limit State power what is far more important is that conventions 'work' (which they do) and do not undermine already established (legal) rules. In addition, conventions fill the 'political lacuna' left by the fact that the UK does not have a formal written constitution. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Government & Politics Revision Notes

    Its democratic as it allows political participation. Criticisms of the UK's Democracy > The Westminster voting system- The first past the post system used for elections to the House of Commons has been criticized for distorting electoral practices and creating a system of plurality rule in which governments win fewer than half of the votes cast.

  2. How, and with what success, have governments attempted to improve the provision of health ...

    However many public sector unions, however, remained sceptical - and are particularly concerned about the extension of the private sector into new areas like schools and hospitals which had traditionally been publicly run. Currently private clinics such as Independent Sector Treatment Centres (ISTC's)

  1. priministers power

    if he does well, if his methods and policies are acclaimed, they also share in the benefits. But if a Prime Minister is encountering difficulties and if the government's policies are bringing unpopularity and press criticism, while some M.P.'s may grumble, the normal reaction is to support their leader.

  2. Is nationalism in the UK reactionary or progreesive??

    Catholic, apart from Ulster, which was forcibly settled by Scottish Protestants from the 17th century. In 1801 it was politically united with England under an Act of Union.

  1. Does the UK have a Prime Ministerial government?

    it ensures that they are very much under the power of the public opinion and that defines how powerful they are. For example, Brown was very much a weak Prime Minister in the sense of dictating policy as he simply didn't have enough public support or a large enough majority

  2. What is the main reason for the loss of faith and interest in our ...

    subject on the national curriculum, the vast majority of UK residents don't have the basic knowledge needed to comprehend the debates and the legislation which is put foreword and discussed in the houses of parliament. Should Government and Politics be a mandatory subject in the Curriculum?

  1. What does it take to change the United Kingdoms constitution?

    Such as after the fall of the Eastern and Central European communist bloc in the 1990s, it lead to a period of constitution-making, as revolutions against socialist regimes led to the creation of new structures that embraced liberal and democratic values.

  2. Unit 1 - Example of Evaluations

    concentrated on this too much and neglected other parts of this task as a result. What would I do differently if I had to do a similar task in the future If I were to do a similar task in the future I would look at example questionnaires and look

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work