"The traditional stress on the petty-bourgeois base of Nazi support need not to be discarded, but instead incorporated into a broader picture." How far do these extracts substantiate this opinion?

Authors Avatar

“The traditional stress on the petty-bourgeois base of Nazi support need not to be discarded, but instead incorporated into a broader picture.” How far do these extracts substantiate this opinion?

From their formation in 1919, the NSDAP were seen as an old middle class party; included artisans, low ranking civil servant, and farmers.

However, from my own knowledge, I know that the Nazi party were not monolithically middle class, and many other areas of support contributed to their success also.

 

The Mittlestand did provide a large portion of both the members and the voters.  It was most definitely the main bank of support for the Nazi party.  Every historian backs this up, some moreover than others.  Each one specifies and refers to the Mittlestand as being crucial in Nazi support.

Join now!

Noakes states that mainly peasant farmers, craftsmen, civil servants and small retailers gave support to the NSDAP.  This was mainly concentrated in towns and cities that were more administrative and commercial.  I know that these people were particularly targeted in the parties early years and that Hitler would often refer to farmers in his speeches.  This support from farmers was a massive contribution at this time as 65% of the Bavarian population were farmers.

Falter backs this up further by saying that the middle class was over-represented.

Later in the period 1930-33, the NSDAP began to gain much more ...

This is a preview of the whole essay