• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe to the Italian Presidency of the European Council.

Extracts from this document...


On July, 18th 2003 the Chairman of the Convention on the future of Europe, V. Giscard d'Estaing, accompanied by the two Vice-Chairmen, G. Amato and J.-L. Dehaene, on the Convention's behalf, officially handed over the full draft Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe to the Italian Presidency of the European Council. This draft aims to give a new basis to the future enlarged Europe with 25 countries, balancing the desires of those who want more integration with the wishes of those who want a Europe of nation states. The draft has been accepted as a basis for the constitution and now goes to governments for further detailed negotiation. The inter-governmental conference, which is composed of heads of state and foreign ministers of the fifteen existing members of the EU and the ten countries due to join in May 2004, has to finalise the text of the first EU constitution. On May, 9th 2004 the European Union should be able to sign its Rome Constitution, so that the signing comes in time for the admission of ten new members and the European elections in June 2004. First, I will define and analyse the principal amendments of the EU constitution which concern the political and institutional aspects of the EU. Secondly, I will explain and analyse the amendments regarding the European values and citizenship in its wide sense. ...read more.


For this reason it seems logical that the future European constitutional treaty, aimed at achieving "unity in diversity" (cf. Preamble, � 5), should make explicit mention of the Christian roots of the continent." [www.europdebat.org; 07/11/03] [www.vatican.va]. Europe will then have to find which values it wants to convey, so that all the Europeans would recognise themselves in the new constitution, and they can share a common "line of conduct". Concerning sensitive questions like religion, it would probably be wiser not to talk about that more than the draft did, as it could raise polemics not really useful for the future Europe, as main European values have already been determined, so religious or not everyone can share them. As the respect for human rights is part of European values, the EU 's Charter of Fundamental Rights is set to become part 2 of the Constitution. But the proposals also include measures to make the European charter of fundamental rights legally binding and enforceable in courts, rather than just a statement of principle. As a result, Britain which has not got national written constitution, expressed reservations about whether the proposals would be compatible with national law [GIBBS, F.; 28/05/2003]. As at present, EU citizens will have the right to move freely within the EU. They will be able to vote in, and to run as candidates for, European Parliament and local elections whichever EU state they live in. ...read more.


The draft made considerable effort to turn Europe in a more democratic one, however there is still a lot to do to make Europe more transparent and easily understandable by the public. V. Giscard d'Estaing 's idea of teaching the constitution in schools may be a good idea to urge Europeans be part of the "Europeanization process". To conclude, we can say that the draft constitution raised debates across Europe. Concerning cultural matters, the main point of argument is religion, and the UK red line issue concerning the European Prosecutor. The major political proposals also brought up controversies, especially the amendment proposing the jobs of President of the European Council for a term of two-and-a-half years and the "foreign minister", and the proposal of change in voting system in the European Commission. Broadly speaking, small countries fear that the negotiation might lead to amendments to the advantage of big countries, because they keep trying to make their national interests prevail. For instance it is very likely that the President would come from a founder state, the new qualified majority voting will favour the biggest countries etc. It is undeniable that thanks to the constitution the new Europe will be more democratic, however it would have been a big step forward if European peoples could have elected their European President, or at least have been consulted on controversial European issues. Some countries will hold referendums on whether to ratify the draft constitution. If any country votes No, there may be a delay until a solution is found. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent has the European Union been successful in "establishing" a coherent European ...

    It will be a kind of shock and challenge for US dollar, which is also a threat for the United State just like the "fear" Salesse (1997) had already claimed. "The United States (were) increasingly opposing and subverting the creation of a politically and militarily united Europe with an integrated economic market."

  2. The Institution of the European Union and Theories.

    To overcome some of the above a firm can move production to a cheaper labour country this will save the firm huge costs. E Justifications The above theories will help firms to compete more effectively as there is ground rules set and firms will have to follow them.

  1. How important is the European Parliament?

    Therefore, the importance of the Parliament's lack of a government or strong political parties is minimal. The European Parliament's roles include the CAP and free trade within the Single Market of the EU. The EU is the most highly populated trading "state" in the world, with one of the highest demands for goods.

  2. What does citizenship mean in the European context?

    Think of the linguistic trio Identity, Identical, Identify. Surely no self is identical to another. It is trite to recall that identity - in an age where for long Choice has replaced Fate as the foundation for self-understanding is a political and social construct which privileges one (or one set)

  1. Regulation 2560/2001 on cross-border payments in Europe.

    This regulation extended also to the use of debit cards to pay directly and to draw money at ATMs. But these methods often were already rather cheap and additionally not as widely used as credit transfers. For the most important part, namely the restriction on money transfers itself, the commission

  2. "To what extent will the proposed EU constitution affect, the procedure for EU/EC negotiation ...

    On the same standards the ECJ in Cases 3,4 & 6/76 Kramer [1976] ECR 1279 ruled that the Member States could exercise its share competence, so long as their actions were not incompatible with the Community objectives. The European Union through the cases and the Treaties has created different standards on the procedure of negotiating and finally concluding agreements.

  1. Transformation of the U.S. Hegemony in Europe through NATO after the Cold War

    On the other hand, efforts to create ESDP (European Security and Defense Policy) by EU and its role as the main source of restriction for the United States to reformulate its frame of security hegemony is the other side of the coin. In this study, I will outline the U.S.

  2. The EU's CFSP and the Iraq Crisis: A Catalyst for Change?

    The most striking example of this is the United Nations Security Council. For historical reasons, both Britain and France are permanent members of the council and empowered with veto rights. Thus the EU has either no votes or two votes in the Security Council, depending on how you look at it.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work