• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The UK Constitution is no longer fit for purpose. Discuss

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Úna Richards 27/03/2013 ‘The UK Constitution is no longer fit for purpose.’ Discuss. Constitutions organise, distribute and regulate the power of the state. They set out its structure, the major state institutions, and the principles governing their relations with each other and with the state’s citizens. Britain is unusual in that it has an ‘unwritten’ constitution: unlike the great majority of countries. Whether the British Constiution is able to fulfil each of its purposes is a matter that needs to be explored. Evidence shows us that the UK Constitution is still fit for purpose, as the state has suffered no major political unrest or violent revolutions, unlike many other countries, many of which have had to install a constitution as a result. One way in which the UK constitution is no longer fit for purpose is that it lacks restraint on the powers of government and Parliament due to parliamentary sovereignty; this may be dangerous, especially to individual and minority rights. This is a particularly good example of how the UK constitution is no longer fit for purpose, as one of a constitution’s key functions is to ...read more.

Middle

The UK?s Constitution has meant that the state?s government is clear and consistent, in contrast to the changing natures of other countries? governments. Futhermore, our Constitution is, arguably, still fit for purpose in the sense that, with it, we have maintained functional, efficient and generally credible governments. Another argument against the UK Constitution?s fitness for purpose is that it was ?written? centuries ago, and consequently was written to represent institutions that are now largely outdated, for example the monarchy and the House of Lords. Both are considered ?politcally irrelevant?, as they go against the UK?s system of democracy. The argument against the UK Constitution?s efficiency is strengthened as these bodies were, and still are, unable to represent the people, as the British people did not democratically elect them. However, as the UK Constitution is uncodified and not completely entrenched, the British government can be flexible when dealing with or implementing new legislature. As the world modernises, the flexibility of the UK Constitution allows our unwritten conventions and laws to slowly evolve with the world?s development. ...read more.

Conclusion

The power held by the executive threatens individual rights, the position of minorities and the influence of public opinion, as the UK Constitution does not provide sufficient controls on what the Prime Minister does, and there are no real ?checks and balances?, unlike the US Constitution. Despite the worryingly large amount of executive power, the PM has never visibly, negatively and drastically exploited his/her powers. Therefore, the UK Constitution is largely fit for purpose, as although the executive has a lot of power there have never been attempts at futher, tyranical or dictatorial control. Overall, although it can be argued that the constitution is no longer relevant and is outdated, it still holds major advantages. It has developed with the country to adapt to changing times, it has never been a major point of issue in the UK in that it has caused problems or prevented good things from happening. Although it may lack democracy in particular areas, it is still fit for purpose as there is no significant issue with it currently, and it is generally fuctional and effective. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    How effective is the British Constitution in protecting the rights of its citizens?

    3 star(s)

    However the ability of these bills to influence decisions is questionable since they are not to include the use of public money and only 20 bills are seen each year, of which only half a dozen have any chance of succeeding due to a lack of time.

  2. The UK constitution is no longer fit for purpose. Discuss.

    An alternative would be to write some of the constitution down, for example basic human rights in a document and entrench it so that basic human rights would be clearly defined both nationally and internationally but leaving the constitution flexible so that the government can still use executive power.

  1. Discuss the indepedence of the UK Judiciary

    The argument of the law lords is another argument against judicial independence. The most senior judges (the law lords), until the reforms in 2005 members of the House of Lords, (this role actually continued until they had retired). This enabled members of the judiciary to also be members of the legislature, which of course is a breach of judicial independence.

  2. priministers power

    * Patronage has severe limitations in ensuring loyalty and submissiveness. Backbench MP's do have other pulls on their loyalty - constituency interests, associations with cause and interest groups and their own consciences and beliefs. Loyalty is the result of generally shared aims not the dangling of rewards.

  1. How Democratic is the New Russian Constitution?

    For a constitution to be democratic it needs a legal system that effectively supports it. For democracy, society needs to be governed by the rule of law that applies to all individuals and organisations within it. In more detail, the legal system in a country should support the constitution by

  2. 'The UK constitution is no longer fit for purpose.' Discuss.

    The monarchy, although some argue are no longer politically relevant, in theory are completely undemocratic, as they are no elected by the people and it is a completely hereditary basis.

  1. Should Britain adopt a written constitution?

    there is no doubt that the spirit of the original document has been diluted?.[10] Facts on Australia Constitution, between 1900 and 1990 42 proposal for constitutional amendments had been put forward and there were only 8 were approved in this regard, it has been observed that constitutional speaking, Australia is

  2. Evaluate the effectiveness of the various ways in which participation and democracy could be ...

    family, be in full time employment, join the army and therefore die for your country; and make important decisions about your future, then you should be given the right to vote. Aside from some believing this to be the correct and moral thing to do, giving 16-17 year olds the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work