• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"The US Constitution is entrenched and rigid; the UK has no Constitution worthy of that name." To what extent do you agree with this view? (40 marks)

Extracts from this document...


"The US Constitution is entrenched and rigid; the UK has no Constitution worthy of that name." To what extent do you agree with this view? (40 marks) This quote is certainly questionable, and there are many factors that need to be considered before a definite answer can be given. The term Constitution refers to a set of written rules and procedures by which a country is governed. It determines the structures and powers of the organs of the state. In this quote, the Constitution may be entrenched and rigid implying the processes to change or amend it are complex and difficult to achieve. The UK's Constitution is made more complicated due to the various sources it has, both written and unwritten. This makes it more flexible and more open to changes and amendments. In 1787, as a result of revolution in the US-the American war of independence- the Founding Fathers created a written, codified Constitution. On the other hand, the Constitution in the UK is a result of organic development and evolution. It has many sources, some unwritten, rather than one document. This makes it uncodified. The sources come under headings of Statute law, Common law, Conventions and Works of authority. In the US only 27 amendments have been made to the Constitution, the first 10 of these known as the Bill of Rights. ...read more.


The judges are appointed, not elected by the people, and because of this he and many others feel it is wrong for them to hold powers as great as these. In the UK however, courts do not hold this power. They can only 'mould' Acts of Parliament through interpretation. Therefore it could be disputed that they have less power than those in the US. It is argued that the codified Constitution in the US is failing to change along with society due to its inflexibility. The most notorious failure to change surrounds the 2nd Amendment- the right to keep and bear arms. This was created in the eighteenth century to ensure the continuation and flourishing of the state militias as a means of defense. In present times, this is arguably not necessary and much pain and devastation have resulted. Examples include not only rises in more common crimes but also in mass killings, and more recently killings at an Amish school and Virginia tech college. The 'outdated' amendment highlights how inflexible the US Constitution really is. The UK, as explained earlier, could change the laws and Constitution much more easily so that it was more modern and relevant to present day needs. However, the US Constitution's granting of power to Congress to 'provide for the common defence and general welfare of the United States' is an example where it is surprisingly flexible. ...read more.


If this amendment was to be discarded, many would accept it to be inevitable that crime rates would fall in time and less peoples' lives would be upset or destroyed. I do however understand the need to uphold the US Constitution as it needs to apply to everyone in every state. The Separation of Powers are, in my opinion, a brilliant tool. They allow checks and balances that among other things reduce the chances of one part of government becoming over powerful. The UK's Constitution though, in my opinion, is far more in touch with the present times we live in. However, I can sympathise with people who become frustrated when more and more power is passed to the EU, causing pooling of sovereignty. It would be extremely difficult to return the powers from the EU, even though in theory it is possible. Since the UK joined the EC in 1973, the acquis communitaire has led the UK towards a more codified constitution, while stopping short of adopting a fully codified constitution. EU laws and treaties now form an important written element of our constitution. They include the European Convention on Human Rights into UK law in 1998 and The Freedom of Information Act 2000. I think caution and careful decisions must be taken before rushing into short term decisions on the Constitution, and the referendum promised on the EU treaty should used. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. To what extent are maps simply the embodiment of information and technique?

    The fact that governments and the operations of state support the creation of maps suggest that there is also a political role being played. For example, the outline of each country is a potent political symbol, and rarely is the boundary a completely physical feature, moreover, it is usually a

  2. Evolution of Democracy and the Athenian Constitution

    state and now the king, who was called King Archon, was left with only the vestigial religious functions. According to Aristotle, for the early offices the tenure was initially for life and then for ten years. Though his descriptions are at times vague we can gather that the Thesmotetai (Archons)

  1. To what extent was the Tsar a Liberator?

    The cases of landlords such as Saltykova, who brutally tortured her subjects, were bound to never happen again, as would the exiling of serfs to Siberia. But although in these areas, the serfs did gain freedom, in other arenas they lost them.

  2. Are Judges Politicians In Disguise?

    In making this decision, the Supreme Court established their power of "judicial review", which allows them to strike down laws that they found unconstitutional. There is another case which is a direct challenge to the neutrality and non partisanship of the Supreme Court judges.

  1. Accounts for the changes in voting behaviour in the last 30 years in UK ...

    Surveys showed that the voters chose to vote for the party that would deliver to them greater personal prosperity which in itself is not considered to be an issue. During the 20th century it is clear that the conservative party was the dominant force in British politics, before the election

  2. To what extent do recent elections in the UK and the USA support the ...

    (D. McKay, 2002: 36) In Britain "dilution of partisanship occurred with reasonable uniformity." (I. Crewe, 1983: 191) Recent election data and commentary seem to support the dealignment thesis however we must be cautious "residual attachments to major parties remain widespread." (I. Crewe, 1983: 19)

  1. The Parliamentary Reform and Redistribution Act of 1884 - 1885.

    He always gave of his best, whether there were two thousand listeners or only twenty. That is the hallmark of the true artist. Source - J. R. Clynes, Memoirs (1937) Analysis It is clear to see that there were many movements that the Socialist principles were found at the base of.

  2. Singapores founding fathers contributed most to its economy. Do you agree? Explain your argument.

    As a result, foreign investments would barely chose Singapore. To deal with the problem, Devan Nair founded National Trade Union Congress which lowered prices of living for the citizens and made daily necessities more affordable. Such actions effectively solved the problem of widespread food shortage.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work