• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The US system of checks and balances is ineffective, discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The US system of checks and balances is ineffective, discuss. In the system set up by the U.S. Constitution, the national government is divided into three branches: legislative, executive, and judicial. These three branches are not independent of one another because the Constitution set up a system of checks and balances to help ensure that no one branch became too powerful. Each branch has powers that it can use to check and balance the operations and powers of the other two branches. The Legislative Branch is given the powers to make law however the legislature may also override presidential vetoes if they manage to gain a two thirds majority in both the Senate and House of Representatives. Although the Legislature can do this, it is realistically extremely unlikely that they will gain a 2/3rds majority as even if a single party does have a majority in one house, they may not in the other such as is the case currently where the Democrats have a majority in the Senate but not in the House of Representatives. ...read more.

Middle

This action would be hugely embarrassing for the President and so the President is unlikely to ever choose a candidate that is too influential. Although Congress can impeach a President, a President has never been found guilty after being impeached for instance with Clinton 1998. The Executive Branch is given the power to carry out the laws. It several checks over the Legislative Branch including the ability to call special sessions of Congress over issues it deems as being extremely important and needing immediate action. If the government feels the Legislature or Judiciary are impeding their ability to govern, then they may appeal to the people in order to get backing on legislation and budgets to prove that those actions are required. This can often be hugely inefficient for the legislature and Judiciary as this means that if the President can gain enough support through media and his party base, then his actions will still be put through even though the other two branches may be against it. ...read more.

Conclusion

These instances show how the checks and balances can prove to be ineffective. The President can also take measures in foreign and security matters such as when the President didn't consult Congress over Louisiana Purchase, Civil War blockade, or even the Vietnam War. After 9/11 security measures showed that the President was taking big decisions which affect civil liberties without consulting either of the other two branches. This was also proven by Bush Jnr's decision to open Guantanamo bay and to hold trials of suspected terrorists within military courts. The American system of checks and balances has worked well over the course of America's history. Even though some huge clashes have occurred when vetoes have been overridden or appointees have been rejected, these occasions are rare. The system was meant to keep the three branches in balance. Even though there have been times when one branch has risen preeminent, overall the three branches have achieved a workable balance with no one branch holding all the governmental power. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Some understanding of the checks and balances detailed in the Constitution is shown in this essay, but there are also some inaccuracies, careless use of language and limited evaluation. A 'discuss' question should be analytical. In what ways are the checks used effective? Do they do what they were set out to do or not? Much more emphasis on evaluating the checks (what's good and bad about them) is needed to improve.

***

Marked by teacher Jessica Jung 04/04/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Evaluate the claim that the Senate is far more powerful than the House of ...

    3 star(s)

    This displays the idea that senate is seen as a promotion from the House of Representatives. In 2005 there were 52 ex-House members in the Senate, yet no ex-senators in the House, this shows that The Senate is

  2. How effective are the checks and balances of the Constitution today?

    you like for the bill to be held up until a time when he can use his pocket veto. The President can also end a Congressional session, although there are some limitations on when he is allowed to do this, i.e.

  1. Comparison of US and UK Constitution

    This allows for a much more dynamic constitution to evolve and adapt to the changing circumstances of the United Kingdom for example, the development of the party system, the decline in monarch power and the increased power of the cabinet.

  2. Examine the effectiveness of the checks and balances system of the American Government. and ...

    The ultimate court of appeals is the Supreme Court. On the federal level, the system of balances empowers Congress to create federal courts, and all federal judges must be appointed by the president and confirmed by the Senate. The courts may exercise the powers of judicial review and injunction.

  1. The Role and Functions of the US President.

    How did they come about? These roles were not included into the constitution because they are obvious roles that the president has. These roles simultaneously go along with the other roles that were written into the constitution. The constitution does not mention anything about political parties so that is why it is not written as on of his roles.

  2. Do the strengths of the US constitution outweigh its weaknesses?

    In addition to this the last time a majority of 2/3rd's was held in either house by a party was in 1964 with Lyndon Johnson who held this proportion in the House of Representatives. This, the largest within the last 75 years.

  1. Is the USA still a federal state?

    $831 billion, was spent on infrastructure, health, education and federal incentives and unemployment benefits. Clearly this economic recovery plan shows federal activism, but a necessity considering the economic climate. However a more controversial feature of Obama?s presidency was his healthcare reform, to which Republicans regarded as the end of federalism

  2. The power of the President is limited to the power to persuade. Discuss.

    Obama did this in September 2011, when he threatened to veto the tax bill that had been amended beyond recognition by Congress. Public support is often stronger for the President than for Congress, so this threat of veto can be extremely significant, as Congress will tend to bow to the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work