• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The US system of checks and balances is ineffective, discuss.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The US system of checks and balances is ineffective, discuss. In the system set up by the U.S. Constitution, the national government is divided into three branches: legislative, executive, and judicial. These three branches are not independent of one another because the Constitution set up a system of checks and balances to help ensure that no one branch became too powerful. Each branch has powers that it can use to check and balance the operations and powers of the other two branches. The Legislative Branch is given the powers to make law however the legislature may also override presidential vetoes if they manage to gain a two thirds majority in both the Senate and House of Representatives. Although the Legislature can do this, it is realistically extremely unlikely that they will gain a 2/3rds majority as even if a single party does have a majority in one house, they may not in the other such as is the case currently where the Democrats have a majority in the Senate but not in the House of Representatives. ...read more.

Middle

This action would be hugely embarrassing for the President and so the President is unlikely to ever choose a candidate that is too influential. Although Congress can impeach a President, a President has never been found guilty after being impeached for instance with Clinton 1998. The Executive Branch is given the power to carry out the laws. It several checks over the Legislative Branch including the ability to call special sessions of Congress over issues it deems as being extremely important and needing immediate action. If the government feels the Legislature or Judiciary are impeding their ability to govern, then they may appeal to the people in order to get backing on legislation and budgets to prove that those actions are required. This can often be hugely inefficient for the legislature and Judiciary as this means that if the President can gain enough support through media and his party base, then his actions will still be put through even though the other two branches may be against it. ...read more.

Conclusion

These instances show how the checks and balances can prove to be ineffective. The President can also take measures in foreign and security matters such as when the President didn't consult Congress over Louisiana Purchase, Civil War blockade, or even the Vietnam War. After 9/11 security measures showed that the President was taking big decisions which affect civil liberties without consulting either of the other two branches. This was also proven by Bush Jnr's decision to open Guantanamo bay and to hold trials of suspected terrorists within military courts. The American system of checks and balances has worked well over the course of America's history. Even though some huge clashes have occurred when vetoes have been overridden or appointees have been rejected, these occasions are rare. The system was meant to keep the three branches in balance. Even though there have been times when one branch has risen preeminent, overall the three branches have achieved a workable balance with no one branch holding all the governmental power. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Some understanding of the checks and balances detailed in the Constitution is shown in this essay, but there are also some inaccuracies, careless use of language and limited evaluation. A 'discuss' question should be analytical. In what ways are the checks used effective? Do they do what they were set out to do or not? Much more emphasis on evaluating the checks (what's good and bad about them) is needed to improve.

***

Marked by teacher Jessica Jung 04/04/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Evaluate the claim that the Senate is far more powerful than the House of ...

    3 star(s)

    This displays the idea that senate is seen as a promotion from the House of Representatives. In 2005 there were 52 ex-House members in the Senate, yet no ex-senators in the House, this shows that The Senate is

  2. What problems faced the framers of the Constitution in 1787?

    The 3/5 compromise allowed slave owners to have better representation because five slaves counted as three people in the Virginian plan, even though slaves could not vote. The framers also gave the promise that it was the responsibility of the northern states to return runaway slaves.

  1. How effective are the checks and balances of the Constitution today?

    President, if this ten days comes to an end while Congress is adjourned, the bill seizes to exist, this is usually used as a tactic by the President so that he does not loose face. Because of the way that bills are passed through Congress, the President can 'arrange' if

  2. How well does the US Constitution Work

    Universal rights and the equality of all persons are no longer alien to US citizens. Ergo the scope by which the nation was governed at that time and the rights citizens possessed at some point needs to "change with the times" in lesser words.

  1. What are the differences between the Judiciary in the UK and the US?

    Education board of Topeka. When the Supreme Court declares a government law or action unconstitutional, the action/law must be set aside and has no force.

  2. What are the advantages and disadvantages of an unwritten Constitution?

    For example it could be argued that if we remain with an unwritten constitution, civil rights could easily be abolished, should a political party wish to. Another disadvantage in having an unwritten constitution is that there are amendments changed frequently without public debate or discussion They are barely known to the public.

  1. "The conflicting interests of the Great Powers made its failure inevitable." Discuss this veredict ...

    1820, is another clear illustration of how the European Powers weren't able at all to agree on important issues because of their own interests. The great powers did not manage to agree on a conclusion to what should be done with the Spain and Naples issue; this was because each

  2. Assess the view that the US Constitution often ensures limited government

    Congress has legislative power, under section 1 of Article 1, and also has the power of the purse, under section 8 of Article 1. Finally, the judiciary rules on the constitutional legality of legislation passed by Congress and executive orders, under section 3 of Article 3 of the constitution.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work