• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The US system of checks and balances is ineffective, discuss.

Extracts from this document...


The US system of checks and balances is ineffective, discuss. In the system set up by the U.S. Constitution, the national government is divided into three branches: legislative, executive, and judicial. These three branches are not independent of one another because the Constitution set up a system of checks and balances to help ensure that no one branch became too powerful. Each branch has powers that it can use to check and balance the operations and powers of the other two branches. The Legislative Branch is given the powers to make law however the legislature may also override presidential vetoes if they manage to gain a two thirds majority in both the Senate and House of Representatives. Although the Legislature can do this, it is realistically extremely unlikely that they will gain a 2/3rds majority as even if a single party does have a majority in one house, they may not in the other such as is the case currently where the Democrats have a majority in the Senate but not in the House of Representatives. ...read more.


This action would be hugely embarrassing for the President and so the President is unlikely to ever choose a candidate that is too influential. Although Congress can impeach a President, a President has never been found guilty after being impeached for instance with Clinton 1998. The Executive Branch is given the power to carry out the laws. It several checks over the Legislative Branch including the ability to call special sessions of Congress over issues it deems as being extremely important and needing immediate action. If the government feels the Legislature or Judiciary are impeding their ability to govern, then they may appeal to the people in order to get backing on legislation and budgets to prove that those actions are required. This can often be hugely inefficient for the legislature and Judiciary as this means that if the President can gain enough support through media and his party base, then his actions will still be put through even though the other two branches may be against it. ...read more.


These instances show how the checks and balances can prove to be ineffective. The President can also take measures in foreign and security matters such as when the President didn't consult Congress over Louisiana Purchase, Civil War blockade, or even the Vietnam War. After 9/11 security measures showed that the President was taking big decisions which affect civil liberties without consulting either of the other two branches. This was also proven by Bush Jnr's decision to open Guantanamo bay and to hold trials of suspected terrorists within military courts. The American system of checks and balances has worked well over the course of America's history. Even though some huge clashes have occurred when vetoes have been overridden or appointees have been rejected, these occasions are rare. The system was meant to keep the three branches in balance. Even though there have been times when one branch has risen preeminent, overall the three branches have achieved a workable balance with no one branch holding all the governmental power. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

3 star(s)

Some understanding of the checks and balances detailed in the Constitution is shown in this essay, but there are also some inaccuracies, careless use of language and limited evaluation. A 'discuss' question should be analytical. In what ways are the checks used effective? Do they do what they were set out to do or not? Much more emphasis on evaluating the checks (what's good and bad about them) is needed to improve.


Marked by teacher Jessica Jung 04/04/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The Main Difference Between the UK And US Constitution Is That One Is Flexible ...

    4 star(s)

    But in over a 1000 times a President has vetoed legislation Congress has only managed to pass it on 10 occasions. The judiciary can review any decision made by any section of government and deem it unconstitutional. It can also interpret the constitution.

  2. What are the advantages and disadvantages of an unwritten Constitution?

    For example it could be argued that if we remain with an unwritten constitution, civil rights could easily be abolished, should a political party wish to. Another disadvantage in having an unwritten constitution is that there are amendments changed frequently without public debate or discussion They are barely known to the public.

  1. "The conflicting interests of the Great Powers made its failure inevitable." Discuss this verdict ...

    This lack of clarity among the Powers became one of the major causes for the downfall of the Congress. As time passes by, ideals change; interests change; and everything that had been agreed upon at a start begin to fall apart into pieces.

  2. What problems faced the framers of the Constitution in 1787?

    The 3/5 compromise allowed slave owners to have better representation because five slaves counted as three people in the Virginian plan, even though slaves could not vote. The framers also gave the promise that it was the responsibility of the northern states to return runaway slaves.

  1. "Presidents have only the power to persuade" discuss.

    The most important power a president has is the power to appoint Supreme Court judges. This gives a president the chance to have their image in place for a long period of time, after they are president. Some presidents are lucky enough to appoint a lot of judges like Raegen and bush, who together appointed 5 of the 9 justices.

  2. Do the strengths of the US constitution outweigh its weaknesses?

    This, the largest within the last 75 years. This shows the enormity of the task, to have an amendment ratified. The strength of this is that unlike the British System, the constitution can't be simply changed by whoever is in charge; there is a complicated and rigid system in place to disable this.

  1. Why did it take so long to ratify the American Constitution?

    They launched a campaign to defeat ratification, believing the Constitution would make the national government too powerful. They denounced the Constitution as a radically centralizing document that would destroy American liberty and betray the principles of the Revolution. However their main objection was that the document did not contain a Bill of Rights.

  2. Explain the advantages and disadvantages of the process of amending the US constitution

    However, since there is widespread support for this amendment, it shows that it is democratic, and that the constitution is legitimate. An argument that supports the process of amending the constitution is that it is still an efficient and democratic system.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work