• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

There are many opinions on the legacy of Karl Marx, but one thing is for certain - He is one of the most controversial figures in history.

Extracts from this document...


There are many opinions on the legacy of Karl Marx, but one thing is for certain: He is one of the most controversial figures in history. He inspired revolts and uprisings that tore countries down all over Europe and Asia. The fascinating about it is he was not alive to see his work play out. Marx was born in 1818 in Rhineland (Present day Germany). His father was a liberal and a Jew. However, in order to keep his job as a lawyer, he had to convert to Christianity. This is interesting because his father really did not want to convert. He did it because it was in the best interests of his family. One could argue Marx came to believe in the classless society in part because of what his father went through. In a classless society, Marx's father would have not had to convert to Christianity. Karl Marx would go on to attend college at the University of Berlin. There he drank in taverns, got into occasional skirmishes and studied philosophy. ...read more.


They soon began attending underground meetings of labor unions, which were illegal. They called themselves the communist league. Here, a manifesto was written by Marx and his colleagues called the Communist Manifesto. This would cause a riot by Unemployed workers in Paris. He was soon banished from Prussia, and finally settled in London (Collins and Makowski, 33). It was in London where Marx married his long time sweetheart, and started to write. Marx and his family were extremely poor. Many of his children died of malnutrition as his family lived in one of the poorest sections of London. The fact that Marx was poor in interesting because his beliefs often centered around the proletariat, or the working class poor people. In 1867, Marx published Das Capital, a piece that some would argue helped bring down the world. In this book, Marx outlined his beliefs on how society should work. Marx envisioned a classless society in the place of capitalism. He believed property should be owned collectively and used for the benefit of all people. ...read more.


They pay workers enough for them to get by. Alienation- Workers are generally not happy with what they do. This causes chaos and dissent in the work place, and makes people feel unworthy (Sernau, 18-19). Marx was a conflict theorist who believed the workers should revolt against the ownership class. He was right in the fact that society was corrupt, and some people were making more than others, but that is society. Many conflict theorists believe Marx was right about class conflict, and conflict in general. He will be remembered as one of the first to debate the ethics of capitalism as well as the father of communism, although many believe Marx would not be happy with some of ways communism has been used in society, such as the absolute ruler, or dictator. More than anyone else, Marx has inspired more revolutions and uprisings in our society. While some of his ideas and practices were correct, his views caused a lot of chaos in the world. He inspired such rulers as Stalin, and Mussolini. While his views and theories could have worked in theory, they were abused by dictators, and thus a black cloud has hung over Marx and his movement. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    In any organization the people who control the kind of information that is produced and, equally important, over those who see this information and when wield enormous de facto power within such structures. The ability to ration and direct information is the obverse of information glut or overkill, but it is no less potentially inimical to organizational health.

  2. Why was the Dreyfus Affair so bitterly divisive in France? The Dreyfus Affair began ...

    The Army and France were seen by the Nationalists as interlocked. The Nationalists were able to use the Army as both a symbol of unity and a symbol of France.25 As it was the job of the Army to protect France, it was believed by those on the right that

  1. "...the gulf between how one should live and how one does live is so ...

    resolved by setting stringent limits to princely wickedness, and in general behaving honourably towards one's subjects and allies. This is exactly what one cannot hope to do, because all men at all times 'are ungrateful, changeable, simulators and dissimulators, runaways in danger, eager for gain'..."

  2. Assess the merits and limitations of the ideas of Karl Marx

    owned in the hands of a small minority of the population, 10% of the population owns 53% of the wealth. According to Marx, society is constructed from classes. In all societies, except the simplest, there are two major classes and it is people's relationship to the means of production that determines which class they belong to.

  1. Socialist uses of workers' inquiry

    The limitations they establish a priori inevitably lead to serious distortions, because they are incapable of seeing connections that would otherwise be evident were their findings situated in a wider framework. Micro-sociological research is often somewhat anthropological and selects themes that are isolated from their wider context thus ignoring their

  2. What did Karl Marx mean by 'exploitation' in a capitalist economic system?

    Marx thought there were merely two different modes, the means of production on the one hand and labour-power on the other hand in existence. The value of the original capital assumed when being money it was transferred into the various factories of the labour-process.

  1. Why did Marx and Engels believe that history was on their side?

    For a variety of reasons, towards the end of the nineteenth century, the interest of economists in economic growth diminished. 1 While there are important exceptions, it is fair to say that strong interest in technical change and economic growth only returned to economics after World War II.

  2. So, whats wrong with Anarchism?

    places, while in other places in the south each town acted on its own responsibility and by 1937 around 3 million people were living under collectivist anarchy11. These anarchists however adopted military methods as well as entering the government as Garcia Oliver did by becoming Minister of Justice and as

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work