• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

There Are No Effective Checks On Presidential Power. Discuss

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐There Are No Effective Checks On Presidential Power The exercise of Presidential power requires agreement from another branch of Government, usually the legislature. The main exception to this principle is the President?s role as Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces because with over 3000 miles of ocean between the USA and its potential enemies, it was not expected that this would be a significant role when the Constitution was written. While there is a check on this power, since only Congress can declare war, the strength of this check is questionable as the President can deploy troops for a total of 60 days before getting Congressional approval. In addition to this, despite the fact that Congress has declared war just 5 times, the last being after the 1941 attack on Pearl Harbour, the US military has been in almost constant use in overseas conflicts, including Vietnam War and Iraq. ...read more.

Middle

It enables it to vote on the money a President is allowed to spend on policies, thus limiting a President's actions. One of the most prominent examples is the Foreign Assistance Act of 1974, which eliminated all military funding for the government of South Vietnam and thereby ended the Vietnam War. This illustrates how Presidential influence does not go unchecked. There is another successful restraint of the President's power - he does not sit within the Legislature and consequently does not have the power to make any laws. All laws originate in the Congress. President can approve them or veto them but the Congress can override the President's veto if it has enough votes. Congress can also adjourn his ?emergency sessions? without passing the legislation he wants. ...read more.

Conclusion

It may be argued that most appointments go through without being blocked and that, in practice, this power is not significant. Yet it must be noted that a key reason why most appointments go ahead is because the president is normally careful to nominate figures who are unlikely to prove controversial to Senators. For that reason, the Senate's confirmation of Presidential appointments effectively acts as a check on the President's power. Although there are effective checks on presidential power, some are undermined by a number of loopholes which the President benefits from, especially in regard to foreign affairs. However, there is a wide consensus that the President faces more checks on his authority within domestic affairs, such as judicial reviews and Congress' power of the purse. Therefore, the allegation that there are no effective checks on Presidential power is false. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. How effective are the checks and balances of the Constitution today?

    Also if there is a two thirds overall vote in Congress, a Presidents veto can be overruled, this power can be hard to achieve but has happened in the past. Congress can amend, block, or reject any legislation put forward by the President; in 2001 Congress amended the education reform bill put forward by Clinton.

  2. Using examples, explain the limitations on the Supreme Courts powers.How do Presidents veto legislation, ...

    If the Senate suspects a judge to be tyrannical they may if they wish remove the judge from their post through impeachment. Even the threat of impeachment can be effective. In 1968 Associate Justice Abe Fortas resigned rather than face almost certain impeachment.

  1. "Imperial in foreign affairs, imperilled in others". How accurate is this view of Presidential ...

    This is exacerbated by the small numbers of the Executive Office of the President, meaning that the President's office has a small influence and only makes up a small proportion of the federal bureaucracy as a whole.

  2. 'The President faces considerable constraints in domestic policy in comparison to the UK Prime ...

    Blair has used his massive Commons majority to prove how easy the UK constitution is to reform (e.g. Anti-terrorism Act 2001, has been seen by many commentators to infringe human rights). Essentially the Presidents role in constitutional reform is non-existent, which is a parallel with the UK PM who's power

  1. "Supreme Court Appointments are always controversial" Discuss

    The main controversial issues of the United States can also be decided in the Supreme Court, for example the issue of abortion. We also saw an effectively landmark case be decided in the Supreme Court, in the Bush v. Gore case, on December 12th 2000, the 2000 Presidential election, was effectively resolved in favour of George W.

  2. US politics.The constitutional system of checks and balances does not work in practice. Discuss.

    Congress possesses quite a significant power; the power of the purse, where congress has to vote on the money that the president wants to spend on his policies.

  1. The power of the President is limited to the power to persuade. Discuss.

    his party and the public after the September 11th terrorist attacks, but lost it after Hurricane Katrina, as he was criticised for his slow response. Furthermore, the President?s power to persuade is almost always rendered useless if his party does not control both Houses of Congress.

  2. Critically analyse the appointment and confirmation process for nominees in the US Supreme Court

    However the US Supreme Court being very diverse a desirable result of the process. In 1916, Louis Brande became the first Jew to be appointed to the Court and in 1967 Thurgood Marhsall became the first Black Supreme Court Justice. Furthermore currently three women sit on the Supreme Court bench.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work