• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

There Are No Effective Checks On Presidential Power. Discuss

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐There Are No Effective Checks On Presidential Power The exercise of Presidential power requires agreement from another branch of Government, usually the legislature. The main exception to this principle is the President?s role as Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces because with over 3000 miles of ocean between the USA and its potential enemies, it was not expected that this would be a significant role when the Constitution was written. While there is a check on this power, since only Congress can declare war, the strength of this check is questionable as the President can deploy troops for a total of 60 days before getting Congressional approval. In addition to this, despite the fact that Congress has declared war just 5 times, the last being after the 1941 attack on Pearl Harbour, the US military has been in almost constant use in overseas conflicts, including Vietnam War and Iraq. ...read more.


It enables it to vote on the money a President is allowed to spend on policies, thus limiting a President's actions. One of the most prominent examples is the Foreign Assistance Act of 1974, which eliminated all military funding for the government of South Vietnam and thereby ended the Vietnam War. This illustrates how Presidential influence does not go unchecked. There is another successful restraint of the President's power - he does not sit within the Legislature and consequently does not have the power to make any laws. All laws originate in the Congress. President can approve them or veto them but the Congress can override the President's veto if it has enough votes. Congress can also adjourn his ?emergency sessions? without passing the legislation he wants. ...read more.


It may be argued that most appointments go through without being blocked and that, in practice, this power is not significant. Yet it must be noted that a key reason why most appointments go ahead is because the president is normally careful to nominate figures who are unlikely to prove controversial to Senators. For that reason, the Senate's confirmation of Presidential appointments effectively acts as a check on the President's power. Although there are effective checks on presidential power, some are undermined by a number of loopholes which the President benefits from, especially in regard to foreign affairs. However, there is a wide consensus that the President faces more checks on his authority within domestic affairs, such as judicial reviews and Congress' power of the purse. Therefore, the allegation that there are no effective checks on Presidential power is false. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. 'The President faces considerable constraints in domestic policy in comparison to the UK Prime ...

    voted into power by the general public at least once every 5 years. During the 1970s James Callahan had the choice to hold the general election in 1978 but decided to wait until the 5 year maximum and between may 1978 and 1979 suffered the 'Winter of discontent' which led to him losing the election in 1979.

  2. Using examples, explain the limitations on the Supreme Courts powers.How do Presidents veto legislation, ...

    If the Senate suspects a judge to be tyrannical they may if they wish remove the judge from their post through impeachment. Even the threat of impeachment can be effective. In 1968 Associate Justice Abe Fortas resigned rather than face almost certain impeachment.

  1. US politics.The constitutional system of checks and balances does not work in practice. Discuss.

    President. However the powers that the president may actually possess have alternatives to it and can be overridden by the legislature therefore there may be checks present in theory but in practice they are somewhat limited.

  2. US pressures groups are undemocratic, discuss

    This proves that pressure groups do not become too powerful and are therefore good for the democratic process. Despite the evidence above, Elitists, believe differently, as demonstrated by C. Wright Mills in 'The Power Elite', "a small elite with interconnected interests govern America and powerful and wealthy interest groups dominate decision making."

  1. "Imperial in foreign affairs, imperilled in others". How accurate is this view of Presidential ...

    In addition, I would suggest that the President of the US is imperilled in domestic affairs because the President has become a small part of a large federal bureaucracy over the last three decades, having little control of segments of the bureaucracy.

  2. The power of the President is limited to the power to persuade. Discuss.

    In this way, it can be seen as an unlimited power- the President is free to use his power of persuasion as much as he can, and can have unlimited influence over the legislature. However, though it may not have obvious checks and balances like constitutional power, it is limited by circumstance.

  1. Critically analyse the appointment and confirmation process for nominees in the US Supreme Court

    The senate have also been criticised for focusing on opportunities to attack and embarrass the nominee. ?They are more interested with scandal, innuendo and gossip than competence?[16]. This occurred during Clarence Thomas? hearings. In this instance the Senate could have justifiably questioned Thomas? nomination on his lacklustre qualifications, considering the

  2. American Government Term Paper #1. Discuss the theory of Checks and Balances as outlined ...

    much power or responsibility, and another is not left out in decision making. The framers? also had a concern with national supremacy. The concern was stated in the supremacy clause, ?which states that laws passed by the national government and all treaties ?shall be the supreme law of the land?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work