• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

There has been a significant Palestinian refugee problem over the last 50 years. Do sources A-F allow you to come to a firm conclusion about who or what is responsible for this problem?

Extracts from this document...


Modern World Study: The Arab-Israeli Conflict There has been a significant Palestinian refugee problem over the last 50 years. Do sources A-F allow you to come to a firm conclusion about who or what is responsible for this problem? Sources A-G give us very mixed answers to this question. Almost all of the sources include a biased view. This is partly because most of the time, the people writing the sources are on conflicting sides. The Palestinians are going to stand up for the Palestinian 'side of the argument', and the Israelis are going to stand up for the Israeli 'side of the argument'. We could go along with the journalists version of events, (Source C), but again, it is possible for the information to be very biased. This is unlikely, however, as the journalist is Irish, and has no apparent reason to favour either side. However, as none of the sources are entirely trustworthy, I shall study all of them, and come to my own conclusions. 'Source A' gives us a Palestinian view of why the Arabs fled from Palestine in 1948. ...read more.


She also states that the Arabs did not leave because of fear of being killed; they left to make room for the Arab armies. This speech was made in 1961, still quite a long time after the Arab Exodus. I believe that because the worst of the fighting was over now, people were no longer afraid to speak out their views, thus giving us an opinionated, yet possibly more accurate source of information. The journalist's version of events was written at the same time as the foreign minister's version of events. In this way, it might have somehow 'swayed' the opinion of the journalist. However, the information in 'source C' seems merely factual. The article says there are museum records proving that the Palestinian civilians were told to stay put, and not to evacuate the country. Because there is hard evidence backing this conclusion, I am inclined to believe the Irish journalist. As well as this, we can see that the museum received its information from a trustworthy, unbiased source (BBC recordings of Middle East broadcasts from throughout 1948). ...read more.


They may also be suggesting that they agree with the fighting, but not the principles of their leader. Finally, I would say that the sources do not allow us to come to a firm conclusion about the reason for the refugee problem, but I think they allow us to come to a conclusion. The evidence is too biased, and we need more opinions from people that are unassociated with Palestine and Israel. Only then may we receive an unbiased answer to the question of why the Palestinian problem was so big. If I had to make a decision on the most reliable piece of evidence, I would say that it is the Irish journalist's. I would be more inclined to support the Arabs. However, I am not fully on the side of the Arabs: I think that neither party was willing to accept responsibility for the condition the country was in, nor did they want to accept responsibility for the refugees. Also, neither the Palestinians nor the Israelis were willing to make a compromise, and 'share' the country. They both wanted all of it for themselves and their people. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Middle east section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Middle east essays

  1. How did the village of Dier Yassin come to be fought over in 1948, ...

    The author was probably not an eyewitness as the source is written in 1984, which is over 30yrs after the event. Often, secondary sources written after the event can be useful and reliable as they reflect a wider picture and writers have access to a wider range of sources.

  2. There has been a significant Palestinian refugee problem for The last fifty-five years, do ...

    This source is also one sided because it is written by an Israeli and is written for the Israeli side and against the Arabs, stating that the neighbouring Arab nations ordered the Palestinians to leave and not the Israeli's. It also says that the 'atrocity at deir yasin' was not

  1. Assess who or what is to blame for the Palestinian refugee problem

    blames Arab leaders for the Arabs leaving their homes. It says that the leaders were telling Arabs to leave their homes so that their armies could enter. It also mentions Deir Yassin, saying that Jewish dissidents were responsible and that it was nothing to do with the government (which goes against what Source A said about the numerous groups involved).

  2. How did the village of Dier Yassin come to be fought over in 1948?

    The Jews fled economic desperation and anti-Semitism in Eastern Europe, and particularly Nazi Germany. By the late 1940's, a third of the population of Palestine were Jewish. The UNSCOP report recommended that the British mandate should end. Jerusalem would be an international zone under UN control, and Palestine be partitioned into a Jewish state and an Arab state.

  1. Palestinian refugee problem - source related study

    By emphasising the horror of the attack, this makes the Palestinians claim to the land stronger. The first line says that the 'Zionists' attacked the village, which puts full blame onto them and tries to make them take responsibility. The PLO used the attack on Deir Yassin as an opportunity to blame the Israeli's for the growing Palestinian refugee issue.

  2. Assess the effectiveness of the Arab and Israeli peace initiatives from the 1970s to ...

    On 13 September and PLO and Israel signed a Declaration of Principles in Washington DC. The declaration included mutual recognition, phased redeployment of Israeli troops and terms whereby a Palestinian Council would govern in the West Bank and Gaza for five years while a permanent peace treaty and final status of the territories could be worked out.

  1. Arab and Israeli conflict - source related study.

    The nature and the way it was written was to tell convey an idea that the Arabs were fighting for no persuasive cause. When looking at a source written by a Palestinian he interprets "All that we got was charity and humiliation while other continued to live in our homes"

  2. History Coursework: The Arab-Israeli Conflict

    The conditions in these camps were awful. One British observer describes the conditions, "families huddled bleakly in overcrowded tents. They are without adequate food or sanitation". This was very true. Initially, large families were kept in small tents, and later small huts of concrete and mud were built.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work