• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extend is fascism a blend of nationalism and socialism?

Extracts from this document...


Cassie Zhang To what extend is fascism a blend of nationalism and socialism? On one hand, fascism is a blend of nationalism and socialism since there are considerable numbers of concepts which link fascism to those two doctrines. It is certain that fascists have behaved like nationalists or in most cases, radical nationalists. First of all, fascists love the idea of uniting people into a single entity. Fascists revere the idea of nationhood because of its ability of uniting people who enjoy the common circumstances of birth. The Nazi form of fascism in particular insisted that it was the role of the state to serve the interests of the nation. As a result, fascism values the idea of organic society highly as nationalism does. Both doctrines believe that the common sense of nationality (or gemeinschaft) will bring a people together into a single whole which will stand above the individual; and fascists took this idea further by claiming that one should subordinate his interests and should obey the leader completely. ...read more.


In Nazi Germany, Hitler's plan of the golden future of Germany also involved the restoration of all its lost territories Moreover, fascism has also engaged with many socialist ideas. Both ideologies see a great value in collectivism where they prefer actions to be taken collectively rather than independently. Fascists believe that the interests of the community are above that of the individuals. Therefore, just like socialism, fascists are against capitalism. They detest capitalism because it is based on the idea of the pursuit of self-interests which will threat the interests of the nation. Fascists are concerned that capitalism which creates class conflicts will destroy the unity and true purpose of the society. The lower middle-class fascists in particular hated large-scale capitalism where smaller businesses were losing out to bigger businesses. Both the Italian and German regimes tried to bend big business by policies of nationalization and state regulation in order to control capitalism. Such policies are indeed socialist in nature. Furthermore, fascists appreciate the struggle of the working class against capitalism and the poor physical working conditions. ...read more.


Fascists believe the strongest person should naturally dominate and they see socialists' attempts of making people equal when they are not will prevent the natural progress of the society. Moreover, fascism is against democracy because they believe it is only the expression of dominant self-interest and the rule of majority is not necessarily right. Fascists stress the idea that only the dynamic leader understands the general will of the people and will lead the nation to its bright future whereas pluralist and liberal democracy would create a weak and directionless society. These ideas are neither presented in nationalism and socialism. They are distinctive to fascism. It has become obvious that there are more links between fascism and nationalism than there are between fascism and socialism. In fact, fascism and socialism conflict with each other in many ways such as the idea over equality; whereas all the fascists could be said to be nationalists since they emphasize on the interests and superiority of nation and importance of unity. Therefore, fascism is not merely a blend of nationalism and socialism, it is a different ideology from those two doctrines but there remains close relations with nationalism. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Similarities and differences between 21st century religious fundamentalism and 20th century European Fascism

    criteria of an ideology, I can safely conclude that 21st century religious fundamentalism is an ideology and not a political philosophy or a political theory. In this last part of the paper, I will provide the basis of its mass appeal.

  2. Main features of fascism

    destroy opposition and not letting them interfere with the rule of the government and this is a clear characteristic of dictatorship. One of the main features of fascism is the racial intolerance, for example the Nazi in Germany believed in the ideology of supremacy of the race "racial purity" so

  1. In what ways is Fascism Totalitarian in Nature?

    This rejection or opposition to democracy could be referenced to the social, economic and cultural climate of the time, in the era of the emergence of Fascism, around the 1920's, democracy in most European countries suffered a series of major crises between the two world wars.

  2. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    The development, or lack therein, is a consequence of individual motivation and is manifested through labor. In keeping with the theory of one's body is one's own, a man's property can be explained in terms of the quantifying forces of his labors.

  1. The development of fascist doctrine.

    The state is the ultimate repository of force to which all other must, in the final analysis, appeal for regulative sanction.

  2. Socialist uses of workers' inquiry

    Do the employers submit to these laws? 40. Do schools exist for children and young people employed in your trade? If they exist, in what hours do the lessons take place? Who manages the schools? What is taught in them?

  1. To what extend is Nationalism a coherent ideology?

    While Malcolm X, a primordialist nationalist, may have wanted to create a new state for Americans with roots in Africa - therefore being closed to all other cultures and ethnicities ? a cosmopolitan liberal, on the other hand, would favour the integration of cultures and the breaking down of national distinctions.

  2. Nationalism is inherently expansionist and destructive - discuss

    superiority was almost inevitably destructive and expansionist as it led to the view that other nations were unimportant and it was therefore acceptable to take them over. This is clearly demonstrated in the case of Nazi Germany where expansionist national feelings led to the invasion of Austria, Czechoslovakia, the Rhineland and Poland.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work