• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent did the key political ideas directly Influence change and development in Your chosen period of study?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐To what extent did the key political ideas directly Influence change and development in Your chosen period of study? Over the past 150 years a number of new political ideas have developed and been accepted as normal practice throughout the majority of European and international society, these come from all sectors on the political spectrum; ranging from extreme left to extreme right. Most of these have been manifested in one way or another since as far back as the middle ages, but it is only in very recent history that they have really ?stolen the limelight?. These ideas are not only responsible for forming the contemporary societies we live in, but also along the way they have influenced some of the most principal and key events history cares to remember. These political ideas that have developed can be classified into two separate categories. The first category includes liberalism and nationalism, both of which are not confined to one country, these are broad ideals and can be found in many ideologies throughout the world we live in today. The second involves the more radical and extreme ideologies such as Fascism, Communism and Nazism. The main school of thought indicates that the first category contains the base ideals for the second categories more extreme politics. For example Nationalism is widely believed to be the basis for Fascism. History is created when something changes and we look back at what it was before. The period of study is full of history, therefore it is also packed full with change and developments. Main areas of change were the specific areas of politics, societal change and economic change. 150 years ago, perhaps the most significant change in recent history was sweeping the world. Industrial revolutions were now seen as the way forward and Britain was at the heart, other countries were beginning to follow suit. Gone were the days of people and animals powering the machines that would draw in the harvest or produce the goods. ...read more.

Middle

The nationalists in this sense were not racially orientated, nor were they into any kind of aggression about expansion and power, they basically wanted the same sort of brotherhood that the liberals wanted. One where the nation treats everybody similarly in the eyes of the law, and a nation where the rule of a number of elite intelligentsia will work for the greatness of that nations and not for the greatness of themselves. If liberalism was the glue that helped to initiate the revolutions of 1848, then Nationalism was by far the brush that it was applied with, it was the forerunning catalyst that engaged the need change. It was their campaign that led to the clash with the old orders and eventually caused them to give somewhat. The revolts had started a process of modernisation amongst the European System of governing, some of these changes were not strictly in keeping with the aims of the nationalist idealists. One of the more notable leaps into modernisation was the arrival of the new conservative rulers who realised that to pacify the masses they must appeal to them in a way that would suit their interests. Rulers who had before seen themselves as the divine ruler and kept unquestionable power were now beginning to see the benefits they would receive if they adopted a favourable stance towards nationalism. Before they had been opposed to Nationalism but now they saw it as a way of making the masses accept them as a king or queen, the masses could relate more to a leader if they were seen to be working for the greatness of the country at large, some rulers even went one step further by setting up institution that would now concentrate more power into the citizen?s hands. Whilst this was going on, German and Italian middle class liberalists who had failed to realise unification through the use of liberal tactics now turned away from their allegiance in favour of adopting a more nationalist stance. ...read more.

Conclusion

They have helped design the standard style of government for contemporary society, whereby democracy prevails and the issues of the masses are dealt with in a way that best suits them by people they have elected to represent them. The Nationalist approach has seen the modernisation of economies and encouraged all European countries to industrialise. This has been for the good of all as a more stable economy creates greater employment and subsequently a better standard of living. The Fascist and Nazi dawns have obviously shed a darker light on the development of society. They have shown how barbaric people can really be, however had they not occurred then society would be a different place. They have helped show that in a multi-cultural society extreme racism is not acceptable, and hopefully with the disastrous consequences they inflicted upon themselves, they will have dissuaded people today who may have the urge to try and take over Europe. The basic underlying theme is that without these ideals then the world as we know it today would be different, our economies have been modernised by them, our living standards have been raised by them and our political influence has been greatened by them, these are the three most significant changes they have influenced and the fact they have covered social, economic and political factors is an example of how important the development of new political theories and ideals is. What these political ideals have left us with is the latest theory, and the one that many societies use today, Liberal-Capitalism is believed to be the end of history. The way in which free market business is encouraged, yet the exploitation of the common worker is not the norm. Whether this is the end of history is yet to be determined, for we don?t know whether Marx?s pure, utopian Communist society will happen, or whether a Fascist regime that has all the appeal to control Europe could occur. In my opinion these ideals have contributed to the development of the fairest society possible today, but tomorrow who knows? David Connolly ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. "At the heart of New Right thought, lies the paradox of libertarian and authoritarian ...

    Some of the key libertarian themes in the New Right are ideas such as having a free market, and having a minimal government. Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan trusted the Adam Smith (liberal) view of economics that the only way the market will 'fix' itself is if left alone, free

  2. Compare the views about the nature and development of Carl Rogers and George Kelly. ...

    He too began practicing with Freud's well known techniques, only to discover that essentiality his theory was completely opposite than the view suggested by Freud. Rogers believed that humans are all basically good and need no controlling, whereas Freud viewed humans as having the same drives and motives as an animal which had to be controlled by society (Maddi, 1996).

  1. What did Karl Marx mean by 'exploitation' in a capitalist economic system?

    Another prediction by Marx was that the working class would be subject to increasing misery as the development of capitalism approached its climax. Capitalism would be obliged, he thought, to keep wages low and hours long. If capitalism could not find markets for the output of its steadily increasing productive

  2. Similarities and differences between 21st century religious fundamentalism and 20th century European Fascism

    "An ideology is more than just ideas; it is also actions based upon those ideas."18 21st century religious fundamentalism can be seen to fulfill this criterion as many examples show this. One example will be the establishment of Iran as an Islamic state and in its latest issue of Iran

  1. Andrew Jackson: Common Man or Common Scoundrel

    president are most objectively understood by a foreigner left unclouded by nationalistic fervor. Alexis de Tocqueville, a French traveler, arrived in America in 1831 during Jackson's presidency. The art of party creation was among the critical observations he made in during his nine-month stay and wrote in Democracy in America:

  2. Utilitarianism: Explanation And Study of Criticisms

    This is the basis of Utilitarianism yet, like Hume, Hutcheson was also not regarded as a Utilitarian. One of the main exponents of Utilitarianism is Jeremy Bentham. (1748-1842) He was an English philosopher who was particularly concerned with social conditions of his time.

  1. An analysis of the Marxist perspective on religion

    Religion is not only the "sigh of the oppressed creature"6 or "the opium of the people", it is also largely due to alienation in a Capitalist society. It is a response to the material and economic realities of the current society; however this provides us with another problem.

  2. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    This brings us down the road of communism, which is a road that Locke is careful not to go down. Strictly speaking, the Lockean doctrine at it's most fundamental level would only allow an individual to gather natural resources for their own survival with the proviso that "there must be enough, and as good left common for others."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work