• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do recent elections in the UK and the USA support the dealignment thesis?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent do recent elections in the UK and the USA support the dealignment thesis? In order to answer this question, key terms in it need to be defined, explained and explored. In this essay, I am going to be answering three questions, which, will point, toward a final conclusion. Firstly, we will need to discover the source of the dealignment thesis, what are its characteristics and what are its implications. Secondly, I am going to have to investigate, whether, either, the UK or the USA, in recent elections, bear any characteristics of the dealignment thesis. Thirdly, I am going to conclude whether recent elections in Britain and America support the dealignment thesis. It is my belief that although we can find characteristics of the dealignment theory, elections are too complex and exclusive events to assign one label to them. Indeed, I believe there are even more important factors that affect election results. Walter Dean Burnham, an American political scientist, first put the dealignment thesis forward in his discussion of 'electoral desegregation', in 1970. Two years later Wallenberg was to describe they're as being a "dealignment in American politics", it was this expression that was to become more commonly used. The dealignment thesis, put simply, is the concept that, citizens instead of shifting allegiances from one party to another, have in fact dropped any allegiance at all. Voters are now very susceptible to election-to-election appeals (S. Maisel, 2001: 57). The electorate now, its is argued have "weaker less cumulative allegiances" (I. ...read more.

Middle

"Voters were conflicted over basic ideology." (G. Pomper et al., 2001: 74) in America with the mass media playing a vital role within the election ideology has to be shorter and sharper. There is less 'air time' to project an ideology to the entire public. This leads to a focus on personality and more precisely what the candidate appears to stand for while not being explicit. In 2004 US Election a Republican television advert simply carried the message "I'm George W. Bush and I approve this message." There is less to vote for in terms of policy substance but in the projection of what a candidate can do. The 1997 election in Britain saw the very clear projection of image rather than ideology. Tony Blair stood depicted as the young face of New Labour. He was shown as being able to invigorate the country after the old and stuffy ways of Major, Hird and Howard. I think this has been a major determinate for voters turning away from ideological voting, as there is less focus on what a party stands for more what the candidates represent. Indeed Al Gore was heavily criticised in 2000 for focusing too much on policy and as consequence confusing the electorate. Thus voters are very susceptible to election packaging of candidates. I have, in my opinion, shown, how, in both UK and USA there is evidence that supports the dealignment thesis. ...read more.

Conclusion

This has ensured that parties in the UK and USA have been pushed to centrist polices. Its effects have ensured less of a stark choice for the electorate. It has become so difficult to choose between parties that are seemingly offering very similar things, that it's reduced to a popularity contest between the front-runners. The ease of access for voters to information about the public and private life of government has given us twenty-four hour scrutiny of government. We know more about politics today than we ever have. Its net result is that on Election Day we have more information and tools with which to make our choices about who will govern us. Paradoxically this has meant that the choices we make are more confused than ever. In many ways we have so much information at our disposal that we can't make real decisions, so it comes down to those few seconds in the polling booth. Dealignment, undoubtedly, is evident in recent elections in the UK and USA. In answering the question, to what extent the dealignment thesis is supported by recent elections, my answer is, inconclusive. Certainly, recent elections uphold the key themes of the dealignment thesis. However this ignores glaring short-term factors that change seemingly obvious voters of a certain party to the opposition. It does; underline the long-term changes that society in both countries has undergone. Voting has blurred on traditional analytical lines of interpretation, though it has conformed around new ones. Recent elections are increasingly influenced by short-term factors. Dealignment fails to accurately interpret these factors into election data that represent events independent from the last. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "Explain And Discuss How The "Ideologies Of Welfare" Explored In This Module Can Be ...

    3 star(s)

    This would lead on to the Thatcher policy in creating a home owning democracy - which in Laissez-Faire terms would create wealth and prosperity for the state and all within it. In essence, Thatcherism was a reaction against the philosophical basis of the Labour party, notably Keynesianism economics.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    To what extent has the UK political system become more democratic in recent years

    Also some argue that certain decisions such as whether to join the EU constitution are too important to be settled in parliament and that the electorate have a right to decide. Despite criticisms of its use, undoubtedly the use of referendums has become for frequent in the last 10 years.

  1. Compare the views about the nature and development of Carl Rogers and George Kelly. ...

    Kelly's theory is often described as cognitive, with the majority of its emphasis on the construction of thought (Jancowicz, 1987). Many people have mentioned this as their primary criticism of Kelly's theory, when in fact; Kelly disliked being called a cognitive theorist (Maddi, 1996).

  2. Utilitarianism: Explanation And Study of Criticisms

    Utilitarianism: John Stuart Mill The basic principle of Mill's Utilitarianism is the greatest happiness principle (PU): an action is right as it maximizes general utility, which Mill identifies with happiness. Each person's happiness counts as much as anyone else's; hence, Utilitarianism is not a form of ethical egoism.

  1. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    This basic pattern suggests that these organizations are under enormous pressure to engage in learning. Attention will certainly be paid to other governmental agencies, political parties, labor unions, trade associations, religious or ethnic groups, the courts, the mass media, professional associations, the corporate community, and other political and governmental jurisdictions at home or abroad that may affect the organization's well-being.

  2. What exactly is Weber's Protestant Ethic Thesis?

    If we are to analyse the above statement of Weber's argument further then perhaps a description of what is meant by capitalism in this context is also required. It is a term that is used often in sociological jargon, and to a certain extent its meaning is sometimes lost.

  1. Does the mass media have a direct effect on British Politics?

    being more likely than unlikely, with the spate of ministerial and junior ministerial resignations after newspaper revelations about them suggesting the validity of this theory. The final major theory about press bias is that the press does have an influence on voting behaviour and political attitudes.

  2. Primary elections in the USA are used to decide the candidates for each political ...

    Conventions were often heated affairs, playing a vital role in deciding who would be the nominee.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work