• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do the Israelis and the Palestinians each have history on their Side?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent do the Israelis and the Palestinians each have history on their Side? The question of who has a legitimate claim to the nation of Israel is one which has incited much violence, anger and debate in the 20th Century and will undoubtedly be a point of speculation for many years to come. Either side has attempted to use history as evidence to support their claim to nationhood, however inherent in the process of historical analysis of the situation, are the problems associated with the rich history of Arab Israeli conflict. The question of a legitimate historical claim is often settled by the side with the historical source which dates back further, or which source is more credible, a myopic interpretation of historical data could easily lend itself to the establishment of a historical claim to the land which is currently occupied by the people of Israel. In answering this question of legitimacy the origins of Israel and its modern history must be examined and contrasted with the laws of historical precdent. The first element of determining either party's historical claim to land is to examine the ancient history of the region of Palestine. Veritable evidence regarding the earliest settling of the Palestinian area begins at around 3,000 BC a people called the Canaanites, direct descendants of today's Palestinian people, migrated from the Arabian Peninsula and settled in Palestine. ...read more.

Middle

Thus, according to the Israeli interpretation of historical data, it is apparent that by virtue of direct lineage and occupation of ancient Israel they are those with ancient history on their side. It would seem that both the Palestinian and Israeli people have strong cultural and historical links to the land which is currently in question. Due to a lack of concrete evidence and a reliance on religious texts it is near impossible to validate either opinion. Therefore without equivocation the only definitive conclusion which can be drawn from the contentious issue of who has the ancient history of Israel on their side, is that resultant form a lack of evidence it is impossible to effectively determine anything other than a shared historical connection to the Ancient land of Israel. The Jewish plea for legitimacy began in the 19th Century, a group of European Jews began to look for a single homeland for all Jews to escape the persecution they suffered throughout Europe and in the Arab world. The leaders of the movement, known as Zionism, considered Uganda, but eventually decided to return to the area known to their religion as Israel. The Ottomans allowed some immigration by Jews into the area, then known as Palestine, and the movement continued after the defeat of the Ottoman Empire by the British in World War I. ...read more.

Conclusion

used another means of coercion more applicable to the 20th Century, Israel lobbied the diplomatic community, it's allies and bombarded the media with the message that it deserved the rights to a homeland. "Israel followed in the footsteps of other regimes throughout history, the only difference was that diplomacy instead of bloodshed was the most effective technique4" Moreover not only did Israel manage to overthrow Palestine through expending it's diplomatic capital it has successfully maintained the integrity of it's borders since 1948, through use of intelligence, alliance and pre-emptive strikes Israel has staved off imminent threats from it's pro-Palestinian neighbors, through achieving this integrity Israel has fulfilled the second criteria of historical precedent and that is to maintain it's nation security and keep in power. In conclusion whilst either party in the Palestinian Israeli conflict could easily construct a case, using differentiating historical data, for having historical rights to today's Israel. However due to Israel's maintenance of territorial integrity and diplomatic pressure, historical precedent ensures that they have ultimately have all of history on their side and indeed the right to remain in Israel. James Robertson A.H.C 1001 1 Samuel 14 : 14 2 Samuel 16 : 11 3 Samuel 17 : 2 4 Anthony Bubalo Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade ; Australian Embassy Tel Aviv 14/10/02 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Middle east section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Middle east essays

  1. Why was the State of Israel successfully established in 1948?

    Across the world a vast wave of public sympathy for the Jews spread and in Palestine the Zionists were eager to capitalise upon it, David Ben Gurion telling those immigrants allowed entry "You are not only needy persons, you are a political force."

  2. The Lebanon Civil War: Syria’s Role in Lebanon

    But Lebanon's parties were totally frustrated and they did not put any efforts in that way. Persuaded that Lebanon situation is so serious the US and in that time, SSSR took some diplomatic steps for finding possible solutions. Again sufferings for people in Lebanon.

  1. Assess the effectiveness of the Arab and Israeli peace initiatives from the 1970s to ...

    The Israel-Egypt agreement clearly defined the future relations between the two countries, all aspects of withdrawal from the Sinai, military arrangements in the peninsula such as demilitarization and limitations, as well as the supervision mechanism. The framework agreement regarding the future of Judea, Samaria and Gaza was less clear and was later interpreted differently by Israel, Egypt, and the US.

  2. How and why did Zionism change from a passive notion to an active ideology ...

    In an effort of self-determination and search for self-identity the Jews embarked on the process of "Haskalah" or Jewish enlightenment. The development of Hebrew as a new and modern vernacular and literature was the first step in the journey to try and provide a modern answer to the question of national identity.

  1. The role of International law in regards to The Palestinian Dilemma.

    Signed and the Resumption of Permanent Status Negotiations of 4 September 1999. Both memoranda, in their preambles, explicitly refer to the legal framework of the earlier Oslo agreements, in particular to the "Interim Agreement" of 28 September 1995. The technical arrangements included in these two memoranda make the fact of

  2. In what ways was Soloman a successful king?

    He had a large bureaucracy modelled on the example of neighbouring Egypt. All of these wives and officers required money through food, living costs, wages, administration, clothes etc and because Solomon did not engage in any military expeditions and so retain any loot, he had to charge the people heavy taxes.

  1. British policy towards Palestine in the creation of Israel, one must carefully analyze British ...

    beginning blocks in creating complexity, tension and problems in the disputed territory of Palestine. The Zionist movement would use the disunity among the Arabs, at this time to there advantage in eventually creating a Jewish homeland. The final British pledge, and the one that formally committed the British to the Zionist cause, was the Balfour Declaration of November 1917.

  2. British Policy and the Creation of Israel

    and its pro-Jewish policies, separating Trans-Jordan from Palestine in May, 1921, and then allotting the newly formed area of Palestine for Jewish immigration.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work