• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent do the similarities between Classical Liberals and Modern Liberals outweigh the differences

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐To what extent do the similarities between classical liberalism and modern liberalism outweigh the differences? /45 Classical and Modern Liberalism can be said to be two very similar ideologies working for the same end result (essentially Liberty) but are slightly different due to the point in history in which they were created. Primarily, Adam Smith saw that mercantilism (government control of foreign trade) was the enemy of human liberty, therefore free trade and capitalism is the best way to achieve economic liberty, and John Maynard Keynes, writing in the early twentieth Century, found that in fact monopolies and the inherent inequality of rampant capitalism was the enemy of human liberty. However, overall the similarities do not outweigh the differences. Classical liberals, such as John Locke, advocated the principles of individualism, liberty, justice, and equality. Modern liberals ostensibly support the same principles, but attach a different meaning to these terms (essentially contested concepts). Therefore, when the differences in the meanings attached to these terms are measured, one finds that the modern liberal definitions directly conflict with those of the classical liberals. ...read more.

Middle

This directly opposes Classical Liberals belief in man?s right to property. Therefore, it can be seen that one person?s ?positive liberty? is the denial of another?s ?negative liberty?. Therefore, despite the fact that both Classical Liberals and Modern Liberals believe in the prominence of Liberty, there is a fundamental disagreement which outweighs the similarity. Another major tenet of liberalism that classical and modern liberals can be seen to disagree is on the idea of individualism. Individualism is the belief in the primacy of the individual over any collective body or social group. It could be argued that classical liberals support a model of individualism that includes egotistical, market individualism, which emphasises self-interest and self-reliance. This is seen as allowing humans to flourish and to profit from their own talents and hard work, realising their individual potential. Classical liberals believe that this can be achieved through ?rolling back the state?, with a hope that it will increase individual freedom and strengthen individual responsibility. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, classical Liberals and modern liberals have similar views on a number of aspects of liberalism. Both believe in the importance of religious toleration; individuals and the state must respect the individual?s right to worship as one pleases. This implies a separation of church and state, as there cannot be one state approved religion. They also agree on the importance of popular sovereignty and consent; government should be ruled by the people rather than by a monarch, a religious figure, or some other elite. Government?s legitimacy rests on the consent of the governed. Overall, it is true that classical liberalism and modern liberalism are both part of the same ideology, they both support ideas such as individual rights, the importance of individualism and the prominence of liberty, however they have slightly different ideas as to the best way to achieve liberty and protect the individual. However, the fact that they have totally different positions on the standing of the state means that the differences outweigh the similarities. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Analyse the similarities and differences between Classical and Modern Liberalism

    4 star(s)

    The period in between the late 18th century and the mid 19th is that magnanimous with Classical liberalism. It was the earliest liberal tradition, and reached its high point during the early industrialisation of the 19th century and is therefore sometimes referred to as '19th century liberalism'.

  2. How and to what extent, have modern liberals departed from the ideas of classical ...

    These were the natural rights that the government should uphold. The rest of the classical liberal doctrines and theories included Utilitarianism, Economic Liberalism, Social Darwinism and Neoliberalism. Also these stated that the market should operate on its own and tied in to the natural rights theory that the individual should be left on his/her own to develop.

  1. Notes on John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

    away to ensure other people their positive rights, so you cannot grant those positive rights in the first place. Of course, the government will be allowed to take money from citizen to provide the basic services of society such as civil protection, national defense, and other essential services - and

  2. Why did the New Liberals attach so much importance to the reform of social ...

    and on the issue of defining freedom, in his essays on Liberal Legislation and Freedom of Contract, '['Freedom' is not] merely freedom from constraint or compulsion. We do not mean merely freedom to do as we like irrespective of what it is that we like.....When we speak of freedom...we mean

  1. How and why does Locke explain the creation, value and protection of property?

    This is by no means Locke's fault because he could not predict the way of life in the nineteenth century. I am sympathetic with Locke's viewpoint. To an extent I agree with every point he makes. What I do not agree with is the fact that his theory excludescertain people, such as the poor and disabled.

  2. How far and to what extent, have modern liberals departed from the ideas of ...

    Meritocracy also meant that members of society should be judged for positions or before the law. Modern liberals however, are disposed to point out that people are born into positions of differing wealth and influence and that are, therefore, born with distinct inequalities.

  1. To what extent do the similarities between classical and modern liberalism outweigh the differences? ...

    In terms of the economy the only point on which modern and classical liberals agree is that economic wellbeing should be meritocratic. Classical liberals believe that there needs to be a free market (laissez-faire) and low taxes in order to maintain people?s negative freedom and prevent state interference.

  2. What were the most important factors in the rise of the modern state?

    form of mutual empowerment as it became evident that sovereign rulers could more credibly commit the members of their organisation within a specified territory. He concludes his main argument by saying that these aforementioned conditions led to a form of mimicry amongst different actors which eventually led to the displacement

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work