To what extent do you agree with the view that referendums should be used more widely in the UK?
To what extent do you agree with the view that referendums should be used more widely in the UK?
Referendums provide a way for the public to have a direct influence on the legislative process. They are a perfect example of direct democracy in modern society. Other arguments for referendums include being a check on the government and increased political education. Arguments against include the great cost incurred through referendums, the eroding of parliamentary sovereignty and increased voter apathy due to the increased participation needed.
An advantage of the use of referendums is that they are a powerful check on Governments without the need for a general election. This means that, if the Government’s stance during the referendum is not held by the majority, the Government know that they are out of touch with the public and a reshuffle of the Cabinet may be held. They are also a check on elective dictatorships, ensuring the Government don’t make all the decisions.
Another advantage is that they give the people a direct say, therefore increasing democracy in the UK. They also provide greater participation, ensuring voting doesn’t take place just every 5 years.
Referendums can also help strengthen a government. If a referendum is used, this could increase public support as it shows that the Government listens to the people. However, if a referendum is not used when promised, such as the Labour government promising a referendum on the Euro but not actually having one, then public support can be decreased.
The use of referendums can also help legitimise important issues made by a Government. An example of this is devolution. In the 1997 referendums on this issue, both Wales and Scotland voted in favour of devolution, thus giving consent to the Government to implement this and legitimising the decision.
