• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent does Parliament control executive power?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent does Parliament control executive power? Although Parliament to some extent controls executive power, there are limitations to the extent of this control. Government usually has an overall majority. The electoral systems put in place by parliament as a whole usually guarantee this, with the exception of May 2010. In the circumstances of a small government majority, the effectiveness of parliament can be increased due to the fact that normal voting patterns and predictable outcomes for government votes may not apply, meaning that governments power is reduced. A majority can mean that to a certain extent, Government can pass any law it wants to. However, the fptp voting system can undermine representation in the commons because it can mean that certain parties are over represented. This means that Parliament's control over certain parties can be limited. The power of prime ministerial patronage renders many Mps excessively docile and loyal. This means that as opposed to the Burkean view which suggests that MPs use their own judgement in acting on behalf of their constituents. The doctrine of the mandate, by contrast, suggests that MPs serve their constituents by 'toeing a party line'. ...read more.

Middle

They attempt to force MPs to vote the way that the party would like them to. This can be seen as both persuasive and threatening. This can have great influence over careers. This is because ignoring the whip can be seen as party betrayal and can be very harmful to the future career of the MP within the party, depending on the severity of the whip which has been ignored. In extreme circumstances, this can lead to suspension from the party or can persuade a party to 'de-select' them. The whips therefore reduce the power of parliament because the votes, again, can be fairly predictable and a majority government's preferred outcome often occurs when back bench rebellion does not occur. MPs can often lack research back up, expertise and political support. This has been exaggerated in recent years with an increasing number of MPs and politicians following politics as their only career. In previous years, it has been more common for MPs to have other careers (usually within Law and Business), this would mean that their expertise would be greater. ...read more.

Conclusion

They also cut across party lines which means they can be said to be independent. They report their findings and recommendations back to the commons. In recent years they have begun to assert themselves more strongly. Eg select committees produced a critical report on the privatisation of air traffic control in 2000. The government usually acts on their recommendations. However, the committees do not also have a great amount of time in which to operate. They can also lack the expertise, resources, staff, power and often the will to be more than an irritant to the government. The House of Lords, despite its lack of democratic legitimacy, has effectively blocked amended legislation when it saw fit. This means that parliamentary power is increased. The balance of power between government and parliament is variable in that a government majority can increase government power but a small majority can increase parliament power. The executive government does however act in an environment when it is constantly under scrutiny and constraints. The strength of these depends on the context of the situation. Simply, the government cannot do what it wants without the approval of parliament which means that effectively, parliament holds power and remains the central institution of the Great British political system. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

4 Stars - The strengths of this essay lie in its competent command and explanation of the subject matter and the precise, analytical conclusion.
Where the essay could be improved is with a more coherent structure - points are not effectively grouped together, consequently the essay 'jumps around' and revisits earlier themes in a confusing way. In places points would be strengthened with a greater use of concrete examples.

Marked by teacher Dan Carter 26/09/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. To what extent have constitutional reforms since 1997 reduced the powers of the UK ...

    The creation of the Supreme Court stopped the link between the government and the judiciary, because in the past the position of Lord Chancellor has been ambiguous, as they have had a role in the cabinet, judiciary and a political party.

  2. Government & Politics Revision Notes

    Representative democracy therefore has the advantage that, in distancing ordinary citizens from politics, it encourages them to accept compromise. > Voter Apathy- Direct democracy places a heavy burden on all ordinary citizens, who have to participate continuously in the processes of government.

  1. The reform of the British Constitution remains an unfinished business. Explain & Discuss

    This change would solve the otherwise perfect democratic progress of devolution. One more important change that has incurred over recent years is the reform of the Lords. This has changed the constitution so that the Lord Chancellor no longer sits on all 3 of the most prestigious political institutions of Britain.

  2. "Differences between power and authority"

    This principle (all but the de facto ruler part) also applies for a business man, take for example Bill Gates, he has power as he owns the biggest computer company in the world and, to certain degree, is able to dictate the way in which has gained his authority to

  1. To what extent are judges neutral and independent?

    This prevents political pressure being placed on judges by the executive or legislative and therefore allows them to make a just decision. If they believe there has been too much govt. influence, they may release the defendant citing a mistrial, another incentive for the government to stay out of affairs so judges can make a fair and uninfluenced decision.

  2. Does the UK have a Prime Ministerial government?

    Another way the PM's powers are under restraint is by their own party in terms of support (or lack thereof). A Prime Ministerial government relies on its party for backing and allowance for the PM to dictate policy but they are also a restraint from the party in the sense

  1. To What Extent is conservatism an ideology?

    Traditional Conservatives have seemed to avoid creating any fixed principles and have opposed political parties and movements that have done so. Conservatism has often been described as pragmatic in that it changes its appearance and stance according to the dominant political opinion at that time.

  2. Assess the view that since 2007 the Northern Ireland Assembly has been a legislative ...

    of members voting, with at least 40% of each community present and voting. It gives each community a veto to prevent decisions or legislation being made which can affect them. A good example of the petition of concern being used is in the rejection of a Sinn Fein motion calling for same sex marriage.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work