• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent does Parliament control executive power?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent does Parliament control executive power? Although Parliament to some extent controls executive power, there are limitations to the extent of this control. Government usually has an overall majority. The electoral systems put in place by parliament as a whole usually guarantee this, with the exception of May 2010. In the circumstances of a small government majority, the effectiveness of parliament can be increased due to the fact that normal voting patterns and predictable outcomes for government votes may not apply, meaning that governments power is reduced. A majority can mean that to a certain extent, Government can pass any law it wants to. However, the fptp voting system can undermine representation in the commons because it can mean that certain parties are over represented. This means that Parliament's control over certain parties can be limited. The power of prime ministerial patronage renders many Mps excessively docile and loyal. This means that as opposed to the Burkean view which suggests that MPs use their own judgement in acting on behalf of their constituents. The doctrine of the mandate, by contrast, suggests that MPs serve their constituents by 'toeing a party line'. ...read more.


They attempt to force MPs to vote the way that the party would like them to. This can be seen as both persuasive and threatening. This can have great influence over careers. This is because ignoring the whip can be seen as party betrayal and can be very harmful to the future career of the MP within the party, depending on the severity of the whip which has been ignored. In extreme circumstances, this can lead to suspension from the party or can persuade a party to 'de-select' them. The whips therefore reduce the power of parliament because the votes, again, can be fairly predictable and a majority government's preferred outcome often occurs when back bench rebellion does not occur. MPs can often lack research back up, expertise and political support. This has been exaggerated in recent years with an increasing number of MPs and politicians following politics as their only career. In previous years, it has been more common for MPs to have other careers (usually within Law and Business), this would mean that their expertise would be greater. ...read more.


They also cut across party lines which means they can be said to be independent. They report their findings and recommendations back to the commons. In recent years they have begun to assert themselves more strongly. Eg select committees produced a critical report on the privatisation of air traffic control in 2000. The government usually acts on their recommendations. However, the committees do not also have a great amount of time in which to operate. They can also lack the expertise, resources, staff, power and often the will to be more than an irritant to the government. The House of Lords, despite its lack of democratic legitimacy, has effectively blocked amended legislation when it saw fit. This means that parliamentary power is increased. The balance of power between government and parliament is variable in that a government majority can increase government power but a small majority can increase parliament power. The executive government does however act in an environment when it is constantly under scrutiny and constraints. The strength of these depends on the context of the situation. Simply, the government cannot do what it wants without the approval of parliament which means that effectively, parliament holds power and remains the central institution of the Great British political system. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

4 Stars - The strengths of this essay lie in its competent command and explanation of the subject matter and the precise, analytical conclusion.
Where the essay could be improved is with a more coherent structure - points are not effectively grouped together, consequently the essay 'jumps around' and revisits earlier themes in a confusing way. In places points would be strengthened with a greater use of concrete examples.

Marked by teacher Dan Carter 26/09/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Impact of government policies

    3 star(s)

    This is really effective as employing civilians on non-operational duties is very cheap and doesn't require specialist expertise or training. Environment - The environment is a very worrying issue disturbing all parts of public life as we are constantly harming the environment with our actions.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    How effective is the British Constitution in protecting the rights of its citizens?

    3 star(s)

    However, private members bills have succeeded in changing the laws on capital punishment, abortion, seat belts, and divorce. The Whip system in parliament has often been the question of debate. Parliament is supposed to be a place where legislation can be debated but a three line whip may cause an

  1. To what extent are judges neutral and independent?

    This prevents political pressure being placed on judges by the executive or legislative and therefore allows them to make a just decision. If they believe there has been too much govt. influence, they may release the defendant citing a mistrial, another incentive for the government to stay out of affairs so judges can make a fair and uninfluenced decision.

  2. How effective is Parliament in checking Executive Power?

    This not only allows scrutiny of the work of the Minister but also scrutinises the political skill of them. Select Committees also serve an important role in scrutinising the Goverment.

  1. Why did the Conservatives remain in power from 1951 to 1964?

    However it was not just what the Conservatives did to stay in power between 1951-1964 it was their opposition the Labour party. During the years of Conservative power Labour suffered conflict within in the party. The party soon became divided over many issues and resulted the party being split.

  2. "Parliament carries out none of it's function adequately". Discuss

    An example of this is the Home Affairs Select Committee that investigated the phone hacking scandal, involving news of the world. An advantage of select committees is that they can highlight an issue and bring it to the medias attention.

  1. Assess the Strengths and Weaknesses of the British Constitution

    People see this as a weakness of the constitution and say that if the constitution was entrenched, the principles or the rule of law and other such acts would not be able to be bypassed so easily. On the other hand, all of these laws/ acts mentioned in the argument

  2. Using these four passages and your own knowledge, asses the view that Thatchers electoral ...

    of Thatcher?s economic success is that economic prosperity was greater in certain areas and perceived particularly by ?Conservative votes.? This point hints at the argument portrayed by Morgan, however his argument carries greater depth as he specifies that the opulence was increasing in the ?residential south? resulting in a larger number of Conservative constituencies with greater voter proportion.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work