• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent does the prime minister dominate the UK political system?

Extracts from this document...


To what extend does the Prime Minister dominate the UK Political System? The Prime Minister is the head of Government in the UK. They are appointed to this role because they are the leader of the party with a majority, or as in David Cameron's case, the leader of a coalition. The Prime Minister is a very powerful figure - he appoints and dismisses members of the cabinet, and choose what jobs they will do. In addition to this the PM chairs cabinet meetings, decides on Government structure (people and responsibilities) and determines the size of Government departments, sorting out who is in charge for different aspects of policy. The PM also sets up cabinet committees to relieve the burden on the cabinet. The Prime Minister does not just appoint the members of his cabinet, he also appoints people into non Government roles, such as the Archbishop of Canterbury and the CEO's of nationalised industries such as Royal Mail. Many people in receipt of knighthoods or O/M/CBE's are actually decided by the Prime Minister as well. The Prime Minister uses this power of patronage (appointment and dismissal) in order to get their own way, by filling the cabinet with political allies and removing those who disagree. Under Thatcher, key Government jobs were given to her supporters (Thatcherites) whereas the one nation Tories lost out - they were sacked or simply not promoted. Thatcher deliberately promoted Thatcherites and eliminated opponents. The same happened under Blair where supporters of new Labour such as Blunkett, Miliband and Mandelson were deliberately promoted into cabinet. ...read more.


They also assist with writing his speeches and will offer policy advice. The Policy Unit is rather self explanatory, it develops policy. Blair often questioned ministers based on briefings from this unit, which he referred to as ''the Downing Street dozen''. Finally, the Press Office looks after the PM's links with the media. This is an important role; Alistair Campbell (Blair's Press Secretary) was voted 8th most powerful man in Britain - ahead of all the cabinet, but still behind Blair. A British PM can claim a personal mandate as everyone knows who he is, but his cabinet members are not as well known. In the run up to the 1997 election, half the stories were not about the Labour party, but about Tony Blair. The TV debates introduced in 2010 also focused on the person, not the party. As well as making the PM more Presidential, they are also increasing his power. Ministers are very reluctant to criticise the PM and people are voting for the person, not the party. Arguably, the PM is better off without a department as the Prime Minister's Office is a department in all but name, according to former top Civil Servant Kemp. As the PM is not bogged down in departmental matters like his cabinet colleagues, his workload is more manageable. The Prime Ministers Office is another instance where the PM exerts his power. The Prime Minister is also in a strong position because he has been elected party leader. ...read more.


The Prime Minister also knows that it is difficult to replace a minister. His cabinet also know this, it is a major strength for these ministers who know that they cannot be sacked easily even if their behaviour is unreasonable. The PM is very constrained in the fact their ministers must be chosen from Parliament. The pool of selection is reduced further when the MP's who are too young, too old and who do not want the job are taken into account. Some more MP's may not be competent enough for the position, or have a colourful past, this rules out even more. So suddenly the PM has to find 80 jobs from around 200 MP's, this is more than one in three. A prospective minister must also be a skilled debater, a people person, a trustworthy and confident individual and the stamina for a demanding job. Not every MP fits this bill. This reduces the power of the PM as he may be forced to keep an individual in Government as there is nobody suitable to replace him. Despite the Prime Minister being forced into keeping political heavyweights in his cabinet, and the sheer difficulty of replacing a minister, he retains a great deal of authority and dominates the political system in the UK. By using the power of patronage, controlling of Government business and cabinet committees along with the vast quantity of backup available to him from advisors and the Prime Ministers Office, the Prime Minister is a very powerful figure in UK politics. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Comparison of the US President and British Prime Minister.

    that power within the British executive is spread in different places at different times, depending on the political landscape. It would seem therefore, that the president has more control over his executive than the prime minister, as McNaughton points out, since he can easily centralize power around himself whereas the prime Minister must refer to his cabinet.

  2. Does the UK have a Prime Ministerial government?

    any chance he had of being a powerful PM, in a similar situation with Major's premiership It could be seen that his leadership was very much affected due to the spectre of the previous conservative leader (thatcher) and also powerful opponents in the cabinet such as Howard and Portillo.

  1. Free essay

    Identify and Discuss the Role of Prime Minister, Giving Specific Examples within the British ...

    An example of this would be the current G20 summit to decide how best to deal with the current economic climate. As head of state he is also the head of the Executive. The Prime Minister is in charge of overseeing the civil services and government agencies, and is ultimately answerable for all its decisions.

  2. How Dominant Is the Prime Minister within the British system of Government?

    Concerns over important areas of policy effectively meant the downfall of Thatcher and Callaghan, (Coxall, Robins &Leach 2003 187-192). The support of the party gives the prime minister the right and influence to carry out their duties, relationships within the party are paramount and are two way.

  1. To what extent has the Prime Minister become Presidential?

    Blair has given unprecedented importance to the image of government. The value of full public support from all ministers is vital to Blair, and collective responsibility has been fully restored. Extensive use of the Press Office is being made, constantly ensuring that New Labour rate highly in the opinion polls.

  2. Arguments that the British Prime Minister is an elective dictator are arrant nonsense. The ...

    of the meeting, rather than counting the votes of cabinet members (votes in cabinet are rare) etc. He also controls central government and can allocate the various tasks of government to different departments, or create and abolish departments. A good example of this was Mr Blair abolishing the "Agriculture; Education and Employment; and Social security" departments in 20014.

  1. Prime Minister & the Cabinet

    Due to the fact that that PM is the head of the executive he/she has the power to appoint and dismiss his ministers of state, cabinet, whips, and the attorney-general and solicitor-general. This power traditionally belonged to the monarch, however it has now been passed down to the PM, [William, A.

  2. How powerful is the Prime Minister?

    For instance, in the case of Thatcher, her disregard for her party resulted in her falling four votes short of being 15 per cent ahead of her nearest challenger in the leadership election. In the words of Heywood, ?they acted to save themselves and their party, rather than the PM.?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work