• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent has the Constitution protected civil liberties in America?

Extracts from this document...


Roz Cresswell To what extent has the constitution protected civil liberties in America? The constitution is only partially successful in protecting civil liberties. At first sight there are three main ways through the constitution that are used successfully to protect American civil liberties; a codified constitution, an entrenched constitution and the protection by the Supreme Court. However, it can be said that the constitution does not protect everyone and there are many examples of its failure to protect civil liberties. Three examples of this are in the period that followed 9/11, particularly regarding the foreigners or in the case of the African Americans in general. The American constitution protects civil liberties to the extent that it is a codified constitution, which states a list of specific rights, which are included in the Bill of Rights. The language used in simple and easy to read which ensures that most Americans are able to understand and be aware of their own rights. An example of how the constitution protects can be seen in the 1st Amendment. It states a guarantee of basic rights, which include: freedom of speech, religion, press and assembly. This protects an American's right to freedom and allows them to express them selves in anyway they want. ...read more.


The Native Americans were deprived of property rights during the nineteenth century. The constitution also condoned slavery and permitted it to continue which can be seen in Article 6 which honoured all "debts contracted and engagements entered into" which was a reference again to the African slaves who were already 'owned'. Another way that the African Americans civil liberties were violated was that even after the Civil War and following the 13th Amendment abolishing slavery, the Deep South were allowed to adopt a series of laws called the Jim Crow laws which allowed a formal segregated South which prevented the African Americans from voting. This violated the constitution as in 1896 the vote was extended to African Americans but this was ignored by many states. Lynching and other attacks upon the African Americans were common, and as no one stopped the Klu Klux Klan it was a violation of Amendment 5 which states that a person " cannot be deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law''. It is clear that at first the African Americans did not have their civil liberties protected by the constitution and were subject to a very different experience than most. Later the constitution was more successful in protecting the civil liberties of African Americans, for example in 1964 Amendment 24 which stopped states using the failure to pay poll tax as a reason for an African American being unable to vote. ...read more.


The constitution failed to protect Guantanamo inmates in the long run. Further more, in 2008 the Intelligence Authorisation Bill, or the Torture Bill was passed by Congress. This was designed to limit interrogation techniques used on suspected terrorists to 19 methods and one example it ruled out was waterboarding. Bush vetoed the Bill and Congress could not gain the supermajority necessary to overturn it. Within the constitution it sates "cruel and unusual punishments" are not permitted and it is down to the Supreme Court to state what is cruel and unusual. So although many would say torture was cruel and unusual, it was never officially unconstitutional and so never seen as an infringement on basic civil liberties. `In conclusion, although in theory the American constitution appears to protect all American civil liberties without fail because it is codified, entrenched and protected, in practise it has only been partially successful in this. It has been interpreted differently to infringe others rights. The three examples of this are the treatment of the African Americans un till the late 1960's, the treatment of the Japanese Americans after Pearl Harbour and the treatment of the suspects in the war on terror. In theory the Supreme Court should have protected them but initially did not. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. How well does the US Constitution Work

    Article 2 pays particular attention in defining the powers of the President. A monarch situation was undoubtedly unacceptable; therefore the powers of the President could only be used with consent of usually the legislature. Again with respect to Checks and Balances, the President's powers in comparison to the other branches

  2. To what extent is it fair to say America is a land of 100 ...

    In the 1970's, Carter was perceived as a weak President and the US experienced a decline in economic and International power. He favoured "big Government" and since then it appears that the vast majority of Americans are suspicious of Government intervention and so the Democrats have needed to change.

  1. The British Constitution

    In the United States, the President will make many important decisions although it is likely he delegates many more tasks. The basic function of any written constitution will define how the constitution itself can be amended. It will establish the rights of the citizens whilst defining the nature of citizenship.

  2. To what extend are rights and liberties better protected in theory than in practice ...

    They would only have rights in theory, but not in practice. Only 'equality of results' would truly deliver equality for racial and ethnic minorities. Hence, the affirmative action programmes were introduced. This entails giving the members of a previously disadvantage minority group a head start in such areas as higher education and employment.

  1. Discuss the arguments for and against a codified constitution

    As a result, for example, a number of asylum seeks have been detained without trial. Under a codified constitution they would be unable to introduce this legislation to restrict people's rights and the only way to do this is to amend the constitution which would be difficult and a lengthy process.

  2. Discuss the view that a Bill of rights alone is insufficient to protect rights ...

    The case of Texas v. Johnson showed the Right of freedom of speech to be upheld, even though a conservative court did not like the action of burning the flag. This is a key example that suggests a Bill of Rights alone is sufficient in the protection of rights and liberties.

  1. Assess the view that the US Constitution often ensures limited government

    This check significantly limits the power of the president, as he cannot go to war, or sign treaties without permission from Congress first. Congress has the power to investigate both members of the executive branch, as well as members of the judiciary.

  2. How effective has the US been at defending civil liberties at a time of ...

    Korematsu vs. United States was a landmark United States Supreme Court case concerning the constitutionality of Executive Order 9066, which ordered Japanese Americans into internment camps during World War regardless of citizenship. Some people think that the US has taken a step too far and continued to threaten civil liberties even when the national security is no longer in danger.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work