• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent has the post of Prime minister become more presidential?

Extracts from this document...


Hannah Quincey October 2003 To what extent has the post of Prime minister become more presidential During the post war period of the last fifty years there has been a perception that British prime ministers have become increasingly presidential and the two individuals connected with this thinking are Margaret Thatcher and Tony Blair. Many commentators have argued and debated Thatcher's role as PM in a time where many consider cabinet government to have weakened creating a stronger and more powerful prime minister. However there has also been evidence to suggest that between 1958-63 Harold Macmillan displayed presidential tendencies when he took to running British foreign policy almost single handedly and enjoyed a remarkable relationship with the media. In contrast to this both Jim Callaghan (1976-79) and John Major (1990-1997) appeared to return to the traditional cabinet. This illustrates that there has not been a constant and progressive line towards presidency. Key to this question, is that definitions of presidency are in effect based upon personality opposed to substance, as Dennis Kavanagh has implied this in his studies of Thatcher, "Mrs Thatcher's success as a Prime Minister illustrates the importance of the office holders personality rather that institutional change"1 When discussing presidency the American model is preferred, as it is the most dominate of presidential models in the world. The president gains authority from the people who elect him, the PM also gains authority through elections however under the current system it is considered that he does not have a ...read more.


Blair's relationship with the media through Campbell has led people again to draw comparisons of his role to that of the President. His regular meetings with members of the press and his weekly conferences with representatives of the press shows once more how Blair wishes to manipulate the media through good relations to get the best possible publicity. Campbell resigned in September 2003 which many hoped would lead to a decrease in the use of spin. Many have acknowledged Campbell's skills, while at the same time admitting how he ensured that Blair's presidential style graduated. "Big personalities embody the period they dominate, of the nineties people will think of Campbell and Blair"6 An additional similarity between the two roles is the increasing appearance of the PM has a national leader. Thatcher and Blair have been used as examples when considering this point, Blair occasionally has the Union flag in the background when making speeches, as the president does with the stars and stripes. "Huge devotional pictures of Thatcher at Tory meetings, her endless taking of salutes on military occasions, her mother-of-the-nation act at national times of tragedy.... describe Thatchers premiership as.. Presidential"7 Foley has argued that elements such as spatial leadership, where the president detaches themselves from the legislature and the presidency has been seen in British leadership. An example of this is John Majors Citizens Charters initiative while Blair has disowned MP's before political corruption reports have been published which could have damaged the government. ...read more.


He has been deeply criticised for not communicating with cabinet and backbenchers, as well as taking foreign affairs into his own role and embracing the media in a large way. The cabinet secretary Wilson however disagrees stating that the prime minister still has many checks on their power stating that executive powers are legally vested in individual departments limiting the PM's powers. Perhaps it is significant to look at the definition of presidentialism, which states " That a president is a form of personalised leadership that is disengaged from parties"11 It is then possible to compare this to a quote from Tony Benn; "The present centralisation of power into the hands of one person has gone too far and amounts to a system of personal rule in the very heart of our parliamentary democracy" 12 Many people consider the role of PM to be changed, most however believe it is branching away from American presidency towards its own British model. 1 Dennis Kavangh from a social Studies review, volume 6 No.4 1991- taken from 'access to politics' 2 The PM and cabinet Gov by Neil Mcnaughton 3 Access to politics 4 Politics by Andrew Heywood 5 Alistair Campbell by Peter Oborne 6 Jonathan Freedland in The guardian September 2003 7 Johnson 1990 quoted in British politics by Roberts. 8 PM and cabinet Gov.- Neil McNaughton 9 George Jones of the LSE 10 Thatcher quoted in Politics by Heywood 11 Politics by Heywood 12 Tony Benn quoted in The British PM edited by Anthony King ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Comparison of the US President and British Prime Minister.

    The governing party's majority, the existence of whipped voting and the application of the guillotine allows the Prime Minister to effectively control the work of such committees. Only amendments, which he favors, will be moved to a vote so that the government Bill usually emerges unaltered.

  2. Government & Politics Revision Notes

    Once members have been individually elected, the party with the most seats in Parliament, regardless of whether or not it has a majority of votes, normally becomes the next government. The need for electoral reform Advantages of First-Past-The-Post * Strong government- They argue that its great strength is that FPTP produces strong single party governments.

  1. Compare and contrast the position and powers of the US president and the UK ...

    However, the Constitution and its makers, do state the powers of Congress first in Article 1 and then the powers of the president in Article 2. Was this their way of putting an individual in his place after the experience of one man's power in Britain during the independence crisis?

  2. The office is what the holder chooses to make of it. Access the accuracy ...

    Nevertheless, as I've previously mentioned Bush has the constraints of checks and balances that are in place under the Constitution. This prevents him from having the room to gain too much power or to act in a tyrannical manner. These checks and balances provide a very clear picture of what

  1. Free essay

    Identify and Discuss the Role of Prime Minister, Giving Specific Examples within the British ...

    Although this may seem like a fairly big task in its own right; however, he is assisted in this particular role by the cabinet and his private office. Another role of the Prime Minister as head of state is that he has the final say in the granting of honours

  2. To what extent has the Prime Minister become Presidential?

    However, the general electoral system has often been described as little more than a presidential contest, with votes being made on the basis of feelings towards party leaders. Due to the fact that the Prime Minister has gained his position through being elected as an MP through the success of

  1. The comparison of the US President and the British Prime Minister appears from the ...

    The passage of the Bill on the privatization of Air Traffic Control in May, despite a massive revolt, shows clearly how the British Prime Minister can push through legislation, which has little support. Contradictions though, most notably from the Major administration, show that other factors also play a significant role

  2. Has the Prime Minister acted more as a president in recent years?

    minister to the independent assemblies and despite the fact that in theory the prime minister could reclaim that power; the public outrage this would cause makes this near impossible. Tony Blair's lack of control was demonstrated by the Scottish abolishment of university fees, an act that was strongly opposed by Blair.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work