• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent have changing relations with the USA affected the development and nature of the European Union?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Aqeel Hussain - P03171280 Alison Statham - POLI 1003 - Contemporary European Issues To what extent have changing relations with the USA affected the development and nature of the European Union? In order to answer this particular question, we must look at how the relationship was between USA and the European Union before all the changes started to occur with both parties. The EU-US relations is a major issue in the world's history. The 'Transatlantic Relationship' between Europe and America, is one of key importance to the economy today. During almost 40 years, the transatlantic relations were aimed confronting the many challenges posed by the Soviet Union and its allies. Based on shared values, common interest and historical experiences, transatlantic relations still remains a dynamic process. However it is one not immune to corrosion. What has been granted by 50 years of serious political and economical association between the two sides of the Atlantic may however fall into danger. The complexity of various issues has shown the differences between the two sides.1 There are numerous examples of 'these differences' thus, before the terrible attacks on The World Trade Centre on September 11th, the Europeans mainly preoccupied themselves with their own domestic affairs. The mood, in the United States also appeared preoccupied but also triumphant. ...read more.

Middle

However, the nature of developing the EU also has its foreseen problems. With enlargement comes the need for further reform, questions such as the appropriate level of governance for different issues in Europe - or who does what inside the EU.4 Even though the terrorist attacks and the war scenes are over, the need for transatlantic relations remain as necessary as it was before the tragic events. A different situation has started on the world scene. A situation where matters of concerns have now largely drifted from hard security issues towards public issues. Military balance no longer dominates world peace. Environmental issues, long-term effects of biotechnologies, the impact of genetically modified organisms on nature and human beings. Public issues such as organised crime with globalise networks of corruption, and, last, the impact of globalisation on democracy and the national state are all issues that now give rise to states on the international stage.5 In a sense, the recent change in the development and running of the EU has come about due to the tragic events occurred on the world stage which has been affected the world, in particular the US. The impact of the US has caused the need for change in various ways. These changes undoubtedly have caused changes in the 'Transatlantic Relationship' with the EU. ...read more.

Conclusion

The US-EU have been very good to each other in terms of cooperation. Despite differences relating to the war on Iraq, anyone observing the US-EU relationship would be struck by the close cooperation they have had on counter-terrorism efforts, non-proliferation and various regional issues.6 In the summer, the US and EU had a good summit in Washington, where they adopted concrete measures to increase our cooperation on non-proliferation, energy, and counter-terrorism.7 In conclusion to this question, what the US has done by changing its relation with the EU to affect the nature and development of the EU is very small compared to what the EU has done on its own to make it a stronger Europe and a stronger partner to the US. As said earlier, what developments the EU has done has changed its relation with the US (e.g. enlargement). However, there has been times where the actions of the US has indirectly affected the European Union (e.g. war on Iraq). Therefore to say that the relationship with the US caused changes in the EU would be unfair to those who work tirelessly in the EU to make it the EU it is today. But it can be said to a small extent that the changing relationship with the US has affected the development and nature of the European Union, otherwise it would be unfair to the US. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. European Union

    It lays down the EU's values and political objectives and makes clear that member states confer powers on the EU, not the other way round. It also opens the way to deeper EU integration, which some people argue will turn the Union into a superstate.

  2. To what extent was the fall of Olivares due to the Union of Arms?The ...

    autonomy"7, reduce tariff and political barriers, and produce some uniformity particularly in the Iberian Peninsula itself through involving set quotas of troops from each province and territory. Olivares was aware that the fragmentary nature of Spain was central to the domestic problems it faced and as a "natural activist" and passionate reformer, simply could not ignore it.

  1. The EU's CFSP and the Iraq Crisis: A Catalyst for Change?

    But the new posture of Blair did not undermine the fact that Britain still saw their "special relationship" with the US to be the right approach, not only for Britain, but for the EU. To that end, Britain has consistently emphasized the importance of NATO in any discussion of EU

  2. Transformation of the U.S. Hegemony in Europe through NATO after the Cold War

    side of the Atlantic, policies regarding the issues of interoperability, defense cooperation and crisis management as well as establishing common standards from the political approaches of both sides are the main areas that are either stemmed from or the result of these two tendencies.

  1. The Importance of the Cyprus Issue in terms of the Accomplishment of the ESDP

    the water even more.2 However, such an attitude may not be able to bring an everlasting solution to the problem as the Greek Cypriots may not feel the necessity to sit on the table for negotiation given that it has the ability to reach its aims on the grounds of the EU.

  2. What does citizenship mean in the European context?

    Citizenship of the Union is hereby established. Every person holding the nationality of a Member State shall be a citizen of the Union [...] As mentioned, the introduction of citizenship to the conceptual world of the Union could be seen as just another step in the drive towards a Statal, unity vision of Europe, especially if citizenship is understood as being premised on statehood.

  1. Economic and political integration between the member states of the European Union means that ...

    Newer members which their economy is not strong compare to Britain's economy, may want to come and work in UK. This will create a lot of competition putting in a great risk UK jobs, as the best one's will be recruited from the UK businesses.

  2. Regulation 2560/2001 on cross-border payments in Europe.

    to move away from its individual interest serving roots of an interstate organization towards a more idealistic common good seeking supranational state-like organization. TECHNICAL ASPECTS With the introduction of the euro in 1999, the European Central Bank needed a real-time gross settlement system (RTGS)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work