• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent have socialists been committed to equality of outcome?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

13/12/14 To what extent have socialists been committed to equality of outcome? To a large but not full extent socialists have been committed to equality of outcome. This can be interpreted as ?absolute?, in Marxist terms where all rewards are distributed equality irrespective of labour. Alternatively, ?relative? equality, as endorsed by social democrats, involves the redistribution of wealth through the welfare state and a system of progressive taxation. However in recent years social equality has been substituted by social inclusion in Blair?s Third Way. Here the focus was on ?hand ups, not hand outs?, as highlighted by Bill Clinton. Marxists support the principle of absolute equality, arguing that rewards should be distributed equally across society. Social equality underpins community and cooperation. Therefore social equality would come from working together for a common benefit. This would bring about solidarity consequently overriding issues of instability and class conflict. Absolute equality calls for the means of production to be owned by the community under common ownership. This would reduce the inequalities reflected in the unequal structure of society, therefore upholding justice and fairness. ...read more.

Middle

This is achieved via a system of progressive taxation - wealth is then distributed thorough the welfare state within programmes such as the National Health Service (NHS) created in 1948. Whilst Social Democrats believe in a form of equality of outcome, they don?t believe in absolute equality. This is because, as revisionists they don?t wish to abolish capitalism, conversely to fundamentalists, they believe in a free market with a managed economy. However, Labour?s 1918 Clause IV emphasised a ?most equitable distribution? of the ?fruits of...industry?. This supports the Marxist principle of absolute equality. On the other hand, Labour goes on to recognise that full equality, although perhaps desirable, could only be realised via a communist revolution by the proletariat; such as the October Revolution in Russia in 1917. Be that as it may, Labour was never a communist party - reflected as such in the same 1918 Clause IV that supported absolute equality - but instead saw to see equality of outcome persuaded only as far as "that may be possible" in a Parliamentarian context. ...read more.

Conclusion

between the rich and the poor may have increased under New Labour, but it is justifiable as the poor became richer during the same period. Welfare was instead targeted on the 'socially excluded' when in 2006 Tony Blair issued his "work is good for you" message. This was a Modern Liberal approach of helping people to help themselves, the rebranding of Incapacity Benefit to Employment and Support Allowance was part of this new ethos. Overall then, the remarkable history of socialism over three century's has not been without its changes and controversies. The socialist commitment to equality has however suffered a 'rebranding' in recent, Third Way, times that it cannot recover from. The Marxist principle of absolute equality can still be seen to survive relatively unadapted in the 1918 Labour constitution, but no mention of it is made in the 1995 one - in short social inclusion has been substituted in for the traditional socialist commitment to equality in modern times. The modern socialist commitment to equality, dragged through the mud by the Third Way, is now not a commitment to true equality at all. Page ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Evolutionary and Revolutionary Socialists Disagree about both Means and Ends - Discuss.

    Revolutionary socialism was the first to be thought up. Originally it was thought that socialism could only be reached through a justified revolution, which inevitably contained violence, early example included August Blanqui who wanted a small group of conspires to seize power, another example would be Marx and Engels.

  2. Theories of Motivation.

    general state of physiological arousal * The individual's cognitions or thought processes. Schachter refers primarily to physiological arousal associated with increased activity in the sympathetic component of the autonomic nervous system. A general activation of the sympathetic nervous system produces such changes in physiological functioning as rapid breathing, increased heart rate, palpitations and tremors.

  1. To what extent was the Tsar a Liberator?

    However, after emancipation, the edict decreed that they were to be given one third of the land they had previously farmed. As this was to be chosen by the landlord, who did not have altruistic motives behind him, the serf was given the most infertile land possible, and even this was limited in quantity.

  2. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    by Rybkin-which were intended to represent the pro-Yeltsin forces and the loyal opposition respectively. The expectation was that the more moderate parties from both directions would gravitate toward these two blocs, strengthening the political center and weakening the extremist parties, such as the LDPR, that had done very well in 1993 (gaining the second most number of seats).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work