• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent is ‘ imperial presidency’ an accurate description of the US president?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent is ' imperial presidency' an accurate description of the US president? The term 'imperial presidency' was coined by Arthur M Schlesinger Jnr to describe the shifting of presidential powers to those associated with monarchy. Schlesinger said that the decay of the traditional party structure led to the presidency as "the central focus of political emotion." One of the main features associated with the imperial presidency idea is that of centralisation. An imperial president centralises decision making around The White House, whilst refusing to co-operate with Congress and avoids Congress in making policy. This can be seen with Franklin D Roosevelt whose crusade of The Hundred Days was a personal mission that largely succeeded in comparison to his more interventionist policies later on. Another method used by an imperial president is that of impoundment. Here, the president refuses to spend money given to it by Congress if they deem the cause unworthy. President Richard Nixon was one of the biggest users of impoundment with $18 billion impounded by 1974. It is events such as this that serve to demonstrate the defensive, even paranoid, role of the president over such matters. This paranoia led to the establishment of 'The Plumbers'. ...read more.


administration and the current situation in Afghanistan. The strength of Bush's foreign policy is enhanced by the enthusiasm of Congress to grant funds. This allows Bush to appear as the spearhead of the situation and if the 'war' is successful, he will ride high on a wave of public support. Bush could use this to gain more funds as surely the Senate's purpose or part-purpose is a representative one and if the citizens approve of Bush, then they are obliged to cooperate with spending policy. Bush is also showing other imperial signs. With the current situation, he appears to be centralising power round himself by encircling himself with a very exclusive and strong lobby of advisers who will be able to get the most out of the Constitution. President Clinton has been accused of being one of the greatest abusers of executive orders. Paul Begela embraced the following view of Clinton's intention to rise above his prerogatives: "Stroke of the pen. Law of the land. Kinda cool!" Begela's flippant soundbite sums up what many considered an office mired in corruption and Clinton ruling by decree. ...read more.


In the late 1960s and early 1970s, legislators, scholars and commentators condemned an 'imperial presidency', mainly because of foreign ventures undertaken without direct congressional consultation or, in some cases, in secrecy and with alleged deception. During this period, however, Congress maintained power and influence in other fields, such as the environment and various other domestic policies, and forced foreign policy initiatives on a reluctant executive. A relatively short while later, in the 1980-s and 1990s, charges were made against an "Imperial Congress" bent on 'micromanaging' the executive. It is not without a certain sense of irony that the president can be viewed so adamantly as imperial, when the "tyranny of the one" is one of the injustices that the Founding Fathers strove so vehemently to reject. And yet MacGregor Burns mused that the exercise of presidential prerogative powers has "made men great". The fundamental flaw with this issue is that it is impossible to guard against an imperial president such as Richard Nixon or an imperilled present such as Carter or Ford. The factor that determines their status as imperial or otherwise is their personality. This is why it is a fundamentally dangerous situation as the president can push his or her prerogative powers as far as his or her personality allows. ?? ?? ?? ?? 1 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. "Imperial in foreign affairs, imperilled in others". How accurate is this view of Presidential ...

    In addition, I would suggest that the President of the US is imperilled in domestic affairs because the President has become a small part of a large federal bureaucracy over the last three decades, having little control of segments of the bureaucracy.

  2. Discuss the claim that the president is merely 'bargainer-in-chief'

    However, presidents have also been able to influence the Supreme Court so that it is more favourable to him, affecting his presidential term as well as future terms in office. For example, Reagan used his presidency to turn the Supreme Court more conservative and right wing.

  1. To what extent could the USA still be described as having an "imperial Presidency"?

    The in 1989 President Bush send US troops into Panama, where the country's military leader General Manuel Noriega, who had been accused of involvement in the international drug trade was arrested by US forces, the invasion took place while congress was out of session.

  2. Was Bush an imperial President ?

    This is because, at a time of crisis, America looks to the president to lead foreign policy. Moreover, Bush violates the Fourth Amendment, for it sends his agents stealing into our lives to search our private communications without probable cause and without a warrant.

  1. "What Factors contribute to a 'Failed' presidency? Illustrate your answer with examples from the ...

    President should be, on the one hand he can be seen as too powerful and unbounded by restrictions while on the other there is the opinion that he is too inhibited by provincial politicians confining themselves to short term advantage in place of long term strategies.

  2. 'The President faces considerable constraints in domestic policy in comparison to the UK Prime ...

    The Bank of England and Insider groups such as the CBI can restrain the Prime Minister with Economic muscle in much the same way the President is to some extent at the mercy of the oil companies who fund him.

  1. presidential power how far does it go

    Doe vs. Ashcroft struck down part of section 505a of the Patriot Act. The laws concerning torture were defined and extended extraterritorially. Finally, the defense of waterboarding has been proven inadequate, and legislation has delineated the limits that the executive branch and military can take in extracting information from captured enemy combatants.

  2. '9 politicians sitting on a bench.' Critically evaluate this description of the US Supreme ...

    as ?politicians sitting on a bench.? However the opportunity still existed for the court to find it unconstitutional, and in Citizens united v Federal Election Commission (2010), it found provisions of the 2002 McCain-Feingold Campaign finance legislation as unconstitutional.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work