• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent is Liberalism compatiable with democracy?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent is Liberalism compatible with democracy? Democracy played an important role in civilisation at the end of the 19th and early 20th century in terms of the liberation of the masses. In the modern world, Liberalism is seen to be merged with democracy but some disagree with this view. It can be argued that democracy is incompatible with liberalism which has been stated by philosophers such as Rousseau and Mill. It can be argued that Liberalism and Democracy can work together thorough democracy ensuring legitimacy and consent. An example of this is the social contract, a main Liberal belief that individuals hypothetically agree to hand over their natural rights in order to preserve themselves and remain free from the chaos of the state of nature. John Locke stated "whenever law ends tyranny begins". Through natural rights being sacrificed it provides the state power to maintain law and order and to protect the individual's rights. ...read more.


Through self-development, it promotes toleration and diversity through a greater number taking part in political matters and contributing to how the state is ran. The fourth argument is that it provides balances between the elite rule and participation. Liberals do not claim that everyone is equal but modern Liberals believe in equal opportunity. This is why they believe in meritocracy, where the individuals with the mental capacity are making the decisions. This links to representative democracy where the MP with the ability to handle the task is elected by the people. J S Mill believed in a qualified voting system that would allow the elite to have a greater influence. It would allow those with a higher intelligence levels to have a vote that would count as two compared to an average intellectual individual whose vote would count as one, allowing confidence and stability on society evolving. Representative democracy though makes the elite accountable through regular elections but they do have the power so they don't have to ponder to the majority's view. ...read more.


They believe in meritocracy through those with greater knowledge able to make the best decision for the whole of society but democracy does not promote this. Democracy assumes all people are equally capable of decision making and which is why every individuals vote counts as one. It is thought by some Liberals that the uneducated have sufficient understanding and therefore can be easily manipulated by things like the media. This therefore results in society not benefiting through beliefs that can be discriminating or sexist being accountable through democracy. This is one reason why J S Mill suggested the qualified voting system. There are two Liberals, Classical and Modern which both fit in with democracy in different ways. Modern Liberals embrace democracy as conductive to personal development and true equality of opportunity whereas Classical does not as much. Liberals believe in a specific kind of democracy, liberal democracy, a believe in a limited government and the ideal for popular consent. Liberals reject having less pluralism and more participation forms of democracy through being to dangerous. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Analyse the similarities and differences between Classical and Modern Liberalism

    4 star(s)

    Essentially, argue Classical liberals Smith and Ricardo, the economy works best on its own, because of the natural forces of the market (the market is self-regulating) and thus there should be a removal of all government restriction on the economy.

  2. Analyse The Main Features of Classical Liberalism

    In the form of methodological individualism, this suggests that the individual is central to any political theory or social explanation. Thus, all statements about society should be made in terms of the individuals who compose it. Ethical individualism is another form of individualism.

  1. Is Liberalism compatible with democracy?

    There is a definite tension between Liberalism and democracy, but this pairing can work together as long as power is kept in check. Democracy is a form of government and could be simply described as the theory of legitimate rule by the majority.

  2. Indonesia: Transition and Prospects for Democracy

    The democratic and moderate opposition such as the PDI-P and Democratic Party (PD) led by Yudhoyono do not engage in violence, making them credible political partners. Rise of opposition It was government policy that led to the growth of the opposition.

  1. Explain why the Liberals were electorally so successful so often, 1868-85?

    the East which he used as a basis for his Midlothian campaigning.14 Gladstone moved from the constituency of Greenwich to Midlothian in order to make a fresh start, and from there conducted a series of forceful speeches that did much to reinvigorate electoral confidence in the Liberal Party.

  2. America Liberalism

    They believed it was predestined and that only the pre-chosen elite would be so lucky as to gain the ticket all Christians yearn for, a pass for entry to Heaven's gates. However, the Puritans were very active people in that they believed that good fortune was a sign of being one of the elite (The Puritan Millennium).

  1. Can a plausible case be made for participatory democracy under modern conditions?

    But, we might argue in reply, not everyone has to participate in such assemblies by speaking, for in reality surely it is highly unlikely that in an assembly of, say, ten thousand people that there will be ten thousand distinct points of view on an issue.

  2. Why 19th Century Liberals Feared Democracy

    The uneducated poor are more likely to act according to narrow class interests so for them to have the majority would be disastrous.Mill argued that the educated can use their wisdom and experience for the good of others.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work