• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To What Extent Is The UK Democratic?

Extracts from this document...


To What Extent Is The UK Democratic? A democratic country aims to have an accountable government that serve the best interests of the people it is governing. The UK is a liberal democracy which ensures that citizens should be able to influence governmental decisions made. But how far is the UK democratic? An element of Britain's governmental system is that there is no written constitution. This means that, theoretically, the government are free to pass any legislation as long as they have the majority in parliament which could be easily achieved if the party has a large majority of seats. This means there is no safeguard for laws that can be altered or new ones that could be created. This is very undemocratic as the government therefore have too much power. The government is also in possession of other powers such as the royal prerogative that allows the prime minister to go to war without consent from parliament. An example of where this was used was the Iraq war in 2005 which was heavily resented by a large majority of the public. ...read more.


Also, everyone over the age of 18 is allowed to vote apart from very special circumstances such as being in prison. However, the election system used (fast past the post) is undemocratic. This is due to the problems of over and under representation whereby the proportion of seats a party gains is not equivalent to the proportion of votes. An example of this was in 1983 when the Liberal Democrats gained 3.5% of the seats when they gained 25.4% of the votes. The system is also blamed for the apparent "two party state" which means that smaller parties are simply incapable of coming into power. It could also be argued that it is undemocratic for the government to be allowed to choose when the elections are as opposed to other democratic countries such as the USA where they are held every five years. A final argument is that votes do not have the same "weight" depending on the votes geographical location; in a safe seat area your vote will have little or no effect on the outcome whereas in a marginal area, your vote can be very influential. ...read more.


In the UK the government is fully accountable for its actions. Examples of this are "prime ministers question time" which is traditionally held every Wednesday. MP's are able to query decisions made and ask questions concerning government policies. This is democratic as it means the people have influence over the government if they can question decisions made as it prevents the government having too much power. It also means that the citizens can fully understand why the government has made certain decisions and can ensure that the government is acting in ways that meet the needs of the people. In conclusion, the UK fulfils all of the criteria necessary for a democracy. These criteria include a free and fair election system, freedom of information and rights and liberties for the citizens. However, some of the criteria are not completely fulfilled, such as the fair election system as it can be seen as undemocratic. Therefore the UK is mainly democratic but could be improved on some issues such as the election system and a written constitution to guarantee certain laws fundamentally. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

4 Stars - An effective essay overall. A clear, logical structure was deployed, a range of appropriate examples were used, and there was a clarity of expression evident. The argument was evaluated logically and efficiently using criteria, and was balanced and fair overall. In places the level of explanation and analysis could have been extended to consider a wider range of salient points.

Marked by teacher Dan Carter 10/09/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Government & Politics Revision Notes

    > Ignoring the Electorates view - Politicians are elected to govern as well as to represent. On occasion, this may involve public opinion being overlooked, even if this proves to be unpopular. Decisions may be taken which might anger the public.

  2. To what extent is Parliament representative?

    In this way, parliament is representative, but is not truly so, because the reasons may not be altruistic in nature (party whips, national interest, self-interest may affect policy decisions). Through this type of representation, it conflicts with other types. This is the same problem with a 'delegate representative', who is

  1. To what extent are judges neutral and independent?

    In recent years, politicians such as the Home Secretary have set sentencing policy rather than leaving it to the judges themselves. The protection of prisoners' human rights as well as the sentencing policy can put pressure, albeit indirect, on judges to do what the government wants rather than using their

  2. Does the UK have a Prime Ministerial government?

    that a lack of support would stop the PM from being able to do those things and usually ends in a new leadership election, there are numerous examples of this in recent history and Whilst it's certainly true that recent history has shown there to be at least two very

  1. To what extent have constitutional reforms since 1997 reduced the powers of the UK ...

    up some roles and responsibilities but not real power as they can return the roles and responsibilities at any time. The Human Rights act was brought in under Blair's New Labour government in 2000. This act enshrined in UK law the European Convention on Human Rights; this meant that breaches

  2. How far do you agreewith the proposition; the cabinet is dead?

    Under Thatcher it declined some what and the role of the cabinet changed fundamentally. The key decisions are now made after consultation with individual ministers and advisors, under Thatcher and Blair, in particular there appears too many that there is little relevance them being there're despite the above roles.

  1. Discuss the case for and against a Written Constitution for the UK.

    These are the legal sources of the UK constitution. These Acts outline the ordinary law of the land, but they are scattered about the statute books and are collected together as constitutional documents. The presence of a written constitution for the UK, can allow for its citizens to be aware of the nature of the constitution.

  2. To what extent have the coalition governments proposals to reform the UK constitution been ...

    It includes provisions to allow the Prime Minister to alter the date by up to two months by Order. There are also two ways in which an election could be triggered before the end of the five-year term the first way it can be trigged is if a motion of no confidence is passed and no alternative government is found.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work