To What Extent Is The UK Democratic?

Authors Avatar

To What Extent Is The UK Democratic?

A democratic country aims to have an accountable government that serve the best interests of the people it is governing. The UK is a liberal democracy which ensures that citizens should be able to influence governmental decisions made. But how far is the UK democratic?

An element of Britain’s governmental system is that there is no written constitution. This means that, theoretically, the government are free to pass any legislation as long as they have the majority in parliament which could be easily achieved if the party has a large majority of seats. This means there is no safeguard for laws that can be altered or new ones that could be created. This is very undemocratic as the government therefore have too much power. The government is also in possession of other powers such as the royal prerogative that allows the prime minister to go to war without consent from parliament. An example of where this was used was the Iraq war in 2005 which was heavily resented by a large majority of the public. Even though this aspect of Britain’s governmental system is undemocratic, parliament generally prevents government from taking too much power.

Join now!

Another way in which the UK is undemocratic is fairly similar to the reason above. As we do not have a written constitution, many of our rules are not entrenched. An example of this is the Human Rights act. Therefore, the government are free to alter these when they please which is undemocratic as, again, they government have too much power that could be abused. One example of when the Human Rights act was ignored was after the 07/05 London bombings where terror suspects civil liberties were restricted and were held in custody for longer than the permitted time. Most ...

This is a preview of the whole essay

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 Stars - An effective essay overall. A clear, logical structure was deployed, a range of appropriate examples were used, and there was a clarity of expression evident. The argument was evaluated logically and efficiently using criteria, and was balanced and fair overall. In places the level of explanation and analysis could have been extended to consider a wider range of salient points.