• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent is there continuity between traditional Conservatism and the New Right?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent is there continuity between traditional Conservatism and the New Right? The New Right, a school of conservatism endorsed by both Thatcher and Reagan during the 1980s, was developed through the thinking of New Right pioneers such as Hayek (in his work The Road to Serfdom) and Friedman, who was largely responsible for the economic policies proposed by the New Right. Theorists of the New Right saw flaws in traditional conservatism, and attempted to amend these by reform it. These flaws resided mainly within society, the economy and the role played by authority in an efficient and coherent society. Both the New Right and traditional Conservatism agree fundamentally on the human condition - that is, humanity is intellectually limited, psychologically dependent and innately selfish. For traditionalist, romantic and paternalist conservatisms, humanity has a limited capacity for altruism, usually extending to family, neighbours and friends. We are naturally but not exclusively selfish, and our acquisitive instincts make us potentially corruptible, yet our laziness and liking for the tried and tested tends to limit the reach of such corruption. ...read more.

Middle

Automatic society was one in which society was able to keep itself in check. It still adopted the same view of hierarchy as more traditional conservatism, in which hierarchy was inevitable and desirable, due to the unequal distribution of skills, and the masses' need to be informed by those who know. We can see that as far as society is concerned, there is little continuity between traditional conservatism and the New Right other than that traditional conservatism sees society as a vehicle for progress, rather than the New Right's more liberal take in which society is a framework for self-realisation - the basis for Thatcher's (in)famous "there is no such thing as society" speech. With the implications of such a view on society, a strong authority is required to temper both the individual flaws and the idea of an organic society. Both classical conservatism and the New Right agree that authority is inevitable and desirable, but here the similarities end. Traditional conservatives see authority as a means of engineering and then sustaining the all-important gemeinschaft however possible. ...read more.

Conclusion

This is a clear attempt to engineer society through economic policy. Whilst the New Right doesn't quite subscribe to the liberal belief in Adam Smith's school of laissez-faire economics, it tends to steer more towards Smith than Keynes. Milton Friedman, the father of New Right economics, saw a problem with the liberal view of the economy, arguing that such freedom would lead to chaos. Equally, however, he disagreed with Keynes' view, and said an attempt to micro-manage economy was bound to fail, as Hayek believed with society. Therefore the New Right adopted a neo-liberal take on economic policy, in which similarities to the 'automatic society' can be seen. He proposed a macro-management of the economy, again striving for stability whilst the economy manages itself. Economic uncertainty was the cause of instability in the markets, and Friedman believed eliminating this possibility, twinned with encouragement of economic efficiency, would lead to a more stable economy, which would help society thrive. In society, authority and the economy, we can see a huge divergence between the theories of more traditional Conservatism and the New Right, which leads me to believe there is very little continuity between the two, as evidenced by the factors mentioned in this essay. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    How Similar was Thatcherism To Traditional Conservatism?

    4 star(s)

    economic liberalism which was needed within a highly capitalist society she was enforcing. Therefore, traditional conservatism was being used were possible and hence adds to the argument that 'Thatcherism' is a modern day equivalent of traditional conservatism. An important area of Thatcher's policies were the erosion of the dependency culture which had been widespread since the mid-twentieth century.

  2. To what extent is there continuity between traditional Conservatism and the New Right? (45 ...

    This society is one which is expected to evolve and learn, and opposes the liberal notion of a gessellschaft, in which negative freedom, the right to do what you want as long as it doesn't impose on the rights of others, reigns supreme.

  1. "At the heart of New Right thought, lies the paradox of libertarian and authoritarian ...

    However, such governmental actions are limited in the consequentialists vision of the free society. This type of libertarianism is often associated with Milton Friedman, Ludwig von Mises, and Friedrich Hayek, the libertarians to whom Thatcher is fond of and is therefore linked to in her liberal thinking in the New Right.

  2. Is the 'New Right' a departure from or a continuation of traditional British Conservatism?

    We must have one as well." This is where Friedrich A. Hayek, Milton Friedman and the Centre for Policy Studies came in. The Conservative Party had not witnessed this degree of ideological zeal before and it represents something of a departure.

  1. To what extent can Conservatism be considered an ideology?

    Liberals can be seen as conservatives as they have conserved their way of thinking: their policies of continual change. Even Fascists and Racists can be seen as adopting conservatism as they conserve their policies of hatred. With all this said conservatism and its make up should be addressed.

  2. How Similar was Thatcherism To Traditional Conservatism?

    approach to economics, which was a core vcontext of the economics at that time this was necessary.

  1. How far did Conservative governments conform to traditional conservatism between 1945 and 1990?

    government, adopted a strategy of incremental change rather than a single straight act. Several unions launched strikes in response, but these actions eventually easily collapsed. Gradually, Thatcher's reforms reduced the power and influence of the unions, leading Britain in this respect to be more traditionally conservative by the end of

  2. What is New Imperialism?

    In order to understand and explain the events of the new imperialist era it is important to describe the change in the balance of power between Britain and Europe. As countries such as Germany and United States began to industrialise Britain's advantage diminished and Britain's share of the world trade

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work