• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent is there continuity between traditional Conservatism and the New Right?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent is there continuity between traditional Conservatism and the New Right? The New Right, a school of conservatism endorsed by both Thatcher and Reagan during the 1980s, was developed through the thinking of New Right pioneers such as Hayek (in his work The Road to Serfdom) and Friedman, who was largely responsible for the economic policies proposed by the New Right. Theorists of the New Right saw flaws in traditional conservatism, and attempted to amend these by reform it. These flaws resided mainly within society, the economy and the role played by authority in an efficient and coherent society. Both the New Right and traditional Conservatism agree fundamentally on the human condition - that is, humanity is intellectually limited, psychologically dependent and innately selfish. For traditionalist, romantic and paternalist conservatisms, humanity has a limited capacity for altruism, usually extending to family, neighbours and friends. We are naturally but not exclusively selfish, and our acquisitive instincts make us potentially corruptible, yet our laziness and liking for the tried and tested tends to limit the reach of such corruption. ...read more.


Automatic society was one in which society was able to keep itself in check. It still adopted the same view of hierarchy as more traditional conservatism, in which hierarchy was inevitable and desirable, due to the unequal distribution of skills, and the masses' need to be informed by those who know. We can see that as far as society is concerned, there is little continuity between traditional conservatism and the New Right other than that traditional conservatism sees society as a vehicle for progress, rather than the New Right's more liberal take in which society is a framework for self-realisation - the basis for Thatcher's (in)famous "there is no such thing as society" speech. With the implications of such a view on society, a strong authority is required to temper both the individual flaws and the idea of an organic society. Both classical conservatism and the New Right agree that authority is inevitable and desirable, but here the similarities end. Traditional conservatives see authority as a means of engineering and then sustaining the all-important gemeinschaft however possible. ...read more.


This is a clear attempt to engineer society through economic policy. Whilst the New Right doesn't quite subscribe to the liberal belief in Adam Smith's school of laissez-faire economics, it tends to steer more towards Smith than Keynes. Milton Friedman, the father of New Right economics, saw a problem with the liberal view of the economy, arguing that such freedom would lead to chaos. Equally, however, he disagreed with Keynes' view, and said an attempt to micro-manage economy was bound to fail, as Hayek believed with society. Therefore the New Right adopted a neo-liberal take on economic policy, in which similarities to the 'automatic society' can be seen. He proposed a macro-management of the economy, again striving for stability whilst the economy manages itself. Economic uncertainty was the cause of instability in the markets, and Friedman believed eliminating this possibility, twinned with encouragement of economic efficiency, would lead to a more stable economy, which would help society thrive. In society, authority and the economy, we can see a huge divergence between the theories of more traditional Conservatism and the New Right, which leads me to believe there is very little continuity between the two, as evidenced by the factors mentioned in this essay. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    How Similar was Thatcherism To Traditional Conservatism?

    4 star(s)

    economic liberalism which was needed within a highly capitalist society she was enforcing. Therefore, traditional conservatism was being used were possible and hence adds to the argument that 'Thatcherism' is a modern day equivalent of traditional conservatism. An important area of Thatcher's policies were the erosion of the dependency culture which had been widespread since the mid-twentieth century.

  2. To what extent is there continuity between traditional Conservatism and the New Right? (45 ...

    This society is one which is expected to evolve and learn, and opposes the liberal notion of a gessellschaft, in which negative freedom, the right to do what you want as long as it doesn't impose on the rights of others, reigns supreme.

  1. To what extent can Conservatism be considered an ideology?

    The Governments in the era of Liberal revolutions can be an example of this. As mentioned earlier this can also include ideologies that are not envisaged as traditional conservatives like the Communists in North Korea as they don't want change.

  2. Is the 'New Right' a departure from or a continuation of traditional British Conservatism?

    We must have one as well." This is where Friedrich A. Hayek, Milton Friedman and the Centre for Policy Studies came in. The Conservative Party had not witnessed this degree of ideological zeal before and it represents something of a departure.

  1. How Similar was Thatcherism To Traditional Conservatism?

    This tax policy was in sync with the continuing process of installing a neo-liberal economic system within the country as shown through the policies of disengagement and deregulation. Yet again although this is a very liberal approach, it was the only option available, as the only other option would be

  2. What is New Imperialism?

    Europe's power and wealth grew as the colonised countries were exploited and new markets for produced goods were protected.

  1. How far did Conservative governments conform to traditional conservatism between 1945 and 1990?

    the 1980s, then they had been at least since the end of World War I. The war effort had left Britain nearly bankrupt, costing about a quarter of its national wealth. This was solved in the end by the Marshall Plan, but that didn't stop Britain's economy from changing.

  2. In defining whether Thatcherism was different from conservatism we must first understand which form ...

    For the first time in its history there was a strong degree of unity under Disreali and this enabled him to act accordingly in reforming Conservative policy. The early years of Disreali's ministry coined the terms "Tory Democracy" and "New Conservatism", as he set about important social reforms to housing, public health, factories, education and trade unions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work