• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was the relatively meagre amount of reform in Gladstone's Second Ministry a consequence of the many problems that beset the Liberal Ministers?

Extracts from this document...


To what extent was the relatively meagre amount of reform in Gladstone's Second Ministry a consequence of the many problems that beset the Liberal Ministers? The main reason for the limited reform in Gladstone's second Ministry can be put down to the problems within the Liberal party itself. The lack of unity and coherent theme was down to the clash of personalities within party members. They had no definite programme and tried to base their policies on, 'Liberalism' A constant battle emerged between the Whigs and Radicals of the party and Gladstone is said to have been the cement of his party. Gladstone was trying to maintain his party as well as trying to run the country. This was hard enough as it is but his interest and involvement with Ireland didn't help matters and in the end was what led to him retiring from politics In theory the Liberal party was what England needed. A party that was out there to get rid of unfair privilege as that was the, 'enemy.' To some extent it did get rid of unfairness but the party was flawed with fundamental problems which limited their progress especially in the second ministry. ...read more.


The Redistribution Bill 1885 affected the Whigs in a negative way,. The redistribution and loss of candidates meant that where there was normally a Whig and Radical representative now there was only a Radical. They hated Chamberlain who was regarded as disloyal. He usually criticised and attacked hi conservative colleagues in articles. Even in the cabinet he went beyond his responsibilities at the Board Of Trade. He denounced the House Of Lords over the Reform Bill and even attacked his own party members. He likened Lord Hartington to 'Rip Van Winkle', the fictional character who went to sleep for 20 years. Chamberlain even published his own official programme and left the party after becoming leader of the Liberal Unionists. This constant battle between party members not only made the party weak but also allowed opposition to attack. The incident with Charles Bradlaugh also caused discontent as he being an atheist didn't want to swear an oath of allegiance. This cause outrage and there was a constant campaign to allow atheist to become MP's. Gladstone being a morally conscious person was left in a difficult position. He was being attacked from nearly all directions and his party was crumbling. ...read more.


The radicals wanted remedial measures and were also against repression. However neither of them were as radical as to want Home Rule and Gladstone saw no other way him turning to Home Rule was what united these two distinct groups to turn against his leadership. Therefore in conclusion it can be seen that both the Liberal party and its ministers was beset with fundamental problems which inevitably had an effect on legislation. The party couldn't unite on one front because of the clash between party members. The party in essence was made up of two differing schools of thought and this caused hostility within the party. If a party didn't agree on anything, passing legislation on it was somewhat impossible. The Whig element of his party contradicted his belief of liberty and justice, and also went against the Radicals in the group and Gladstone had the task of trying to maintain these personalities and unite them on one aim . However Gladstone himself began to concern himself with Ireland and his second, third and fourth ministries were devoted to that. With no one to act as the,' cement' of the party and their leader trying to change something the majority of the country was against ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Notes on John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

    walk into the empty shaft and if I knew that this would surely cause my death, this would allow me to make my own decision and to choose to continue if I really wanted to. d) Consenting adults: Lastly, if two (or more)

  2. Is the Liberal perspective on world politics too idealistic?

    (Sandel, M. 1984. Page 63) Liberalism emphasises the recognition of equality, this is also know as the strategy of privatization. Liberals argue that a individuals political and religious views are a matter of private concern. They stress that equality should be enforced through a set of basic and civil rights and economic entitlements.

  1. What are the main ideological principles of the conservatives, Labour and Liberal democrats? To ...

    Introducing top up fees is certainly not going to encourage working-class people to go to university and identity cards most defiantly are not going to promote social equality. I believe the only reason the party changed its principles is because it was not gaining any support.

  2. To what extent was Fascist Italy the bastard child of Liberal Italy?

    Corruption was such a large problem that Giovanni Giolitti admitted that there were places "where the law does not operate at all". Between 1892 and 1921 the South suffered from mass emigration, mainly to the US. This meant fewer workers were available for Industrialisation in the South and so it remained backward.

  1. Compare and Contrast the Classical Liberal position with the Conservative position on the issue ...

    The conservatives on the other hand believe that present society needs to strengthen the existing legislation by implementing tougher penalties for deterrence. The Conservatives agree with the Classical Liberals that the current legislation is not rational due to some legal drugs being more harmful then illegal ones.

  2. The Parliamentary Reform and Redistribution Act of 1884 - 1885.

    adult male householders and �10 lodgers the right to vote Also added about six million to the total number who could vote in parliamentary elections Source-http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/PR1884.htm This source is supported by: The act extended the 1867 concessions from the boroughs to the countryside.

  1. Great Depression

    not to the anarchy of unrestricted profiteering, but to 'regulated economics' " (Leuchtenburg, 148). Germany had also abandoned monopolies, favoring increased business regulation instead. In 1936 the government curtailed managerial decision making rights. Furthermore, in 1938, the Nazi government finally imposed limits upon the cartel system; particularly the powerful steel and automotive industries.

  2. To what extent was the Tsar a Liberator?

    Sexual exploitation was the exception, not the rule. According to one British traveller to Russia in the nineteenth century, the lot of the Russian Peasant was "more enviable than our own."iii After emancipation, they lost many of their rights. Beforehand, they could farm as much land as they wished.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work