• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent was there Socialism before Marx?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent was there Socialism before Marx? As an identifiable body of argument, socialism developed in Europe from the end of the eighteenth Century, almost as a response to Industrialisation. At its simplest it is a system in which the state controls the basic means of production. Through this process it is ble to the region produces what it needs and not what it desires, therefore associating itself with nationalism. Once its General character had been established, attempts were made to discover intellectual precedents, and by the 20th Century socialist arguments had been articulated all over the world. Its origins lie nonetheless in the three principle industrial nations of the eighteenth Century, France, Germany and the United Kingdom. The main underlying principle of Socialism, this is Human Nature. 'Pessimism leads to order and a control but no trust while 'Optimism' leads to a lack of excessive control. Socialist theories differ from one another in many different ways, but on the whole they share three things in common. They all believe that the root cause of oppression is Capitalism, which divides society into those who have and those who have not. The fact that possession of property exists means that land owners can live off the work of their workers. They all believe that the solution to this inequality is to create a society where there are no class boundaries. ...read more.

Middle

Utopianism was another branch of early Socialist ideas, and it went back to Plato's criticism of the existing society. The first Utopian Socialist to produce a class study was St Simon. In his publication letters from inhabitant of Geneva he explains that society is broken up into Parasites and Producers, of which he admitted to being a parasite, and that this social system was becoming more and more unequal. In The theory of the for-movements Fourier explains how the world had been perfectly created by God, and that man had destructed this. He came up with a solution which was to sub divide society into 16-1800 people, these would be known as phallasteres. This number was chosen for it as assumed to be not too big to alienate its members and big enough to cater for society. It was based on equality, as any surpluses produced would be swapped with other phallasteres, so as to not build up any profits. Robert Owen was a Scotland based English man who built and owned factories in Scotland. However what was different about him was that he created free housing, schooling and shops where goods were sold at a discount price. He did this because he thought that it was of his own Economic interest to look after his workers. And in this case he was correct, for everyone wanted to work for him, and put in 100% effort, for they all wanted the factory to do well and therefore for it to stay open. ...read more.

Conclusion

Lead predominantly by Gerald Winstanley. He argued that the existing system of land ownership meant that England was not properly cultivated. "The selfishness of a few leads to deprivation of millions." Marxism is the economic, social and political theory and practice originating in the works of Karl Marx and Friedriech Engels. Karl Marx himself was the son of a lawyer and studied law and philosophy at University. He rejected the ideals of Hegel but was positively influenced by the work of Moses Hess. In 1848 he wrote, with Engels, the Communist Manifesto and other works that broke with the tradition of appealing to natural rights to justify social reform, instead one of his main ideas was the power of history that would inevitably provoke social reform. With the help of Engels, Marx founded the International Workingmen's Association. There is no doubt that Marx and Engels changed the Socialist views and helped to modernise and adapt Socialism to be more applicable o today's world. However as can be seen in this essay, Socialism existed as an entire form before Marx. Socialism was very scrambled at the time of the Diggers etc and it was Marx who brought the ideas together o forma comprehensive ideology, that later became Marxism... The Charterists campaigned for a Bill of Rights to be issued. They were generally political reformers. They also wanted the House of Lords to be abolished for they saw it as un-demographic and un democratic. There main aim however was that of equality, and they were shortly followed by Marx and Engels. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Why does Marx believe that capitalism will inevitably give way to socialism?

    the relations between owners/employers and their staff (Marsh et. al. 1996, pp51-53). These explanations are important as they provide a necessary background to the points I will make, in regard to Marx's critique of capitalism. Conflict and contradiction arises according to Marx, in all but two of the historical societies

  2. 'Socialists have disagreed on both the means and ends of socialism' - Discuss

    These ideas dominated socialist parties at the turn of the century, and in the 1970s were adopted by communist parties in some European countries such as Spain and France. Many socialists believed that the nature of the democratic process would inevitably lead to socialism.

  1. The study of international or rather global politics, seeks to provide an account of ...

    The need to develop regional institutions is a manifestation of globalisation, in very much the same way as the spread of the nation-state as the principle political form was earlier a product of increased global interaction (Baylis & Smith 2001:641).

  2. Why did Marx and Engels believe that history was on their side?

    Schumpeter's second important contribution was to call attention to the relationship between industrial structure and technological advance. In particular, he called attention to the fact that, while innovation was a central form of competition in many industries, the structure of those industries never was "perfectly competitive" in the sense articulated in standard macroeconomic theory textbooks.

  1. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    Something similar to providing minorities with the voice option occurs when the firm introduces new or improved procedures that permit criticism of existing policies. Adversary styles of decision-making create a distinctive format for structured learning. Such learning, it might be recalled, is likely to work optimally in situations where the overall organization is more federal than unitary in character.

  2. Critically Evaluate the Impact of Socialist Organisations and Ideas on the Early Labour Party.

    But there was also something of a fight back by employers, who began using police protected scab labour to break strikes. Although the rise and fall of new Unionism was short it had the lasting effect of making all unions more susceptible to socialist ideas & influences.

  1. Which theorist is most applicable to understanding work today, Marx, Weber or Durkheim?

    the employer is simply concerned with employing cheap labour to minimise costs and thus maximise profits, and with achieving a powerful position in society. Therefore workers and owners will never reconcile this conflict of interests. Work today has taken on a different meaning than in the past.

  2. To what extent are the socialist/ social democratic parties nationally distinct?

    After WW2, the social democrats were under the leadership of Kurt Schumacher, an anti-communist and strict socialist. Electorally, this was not a good spell for the party. Schumacher misjudged the post-war situation in Germany; his domestic policies were not accepted by the electorate.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work