• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent would you regard the UK system as truly democratic?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

C) To what extent would you regard the UK system as being truly democratic? (25 marks) Democracy is a general description of a political system that is organised on the basis that government should serve the interests of the people. It is expected that citizens should also influence decisions or make decisions themselves as well as this; the government should be accountable under a democratic society. The UK is regarded as beholding democracy however current trends suggest increasing political apathy have begun to question whether the UK political system is truly democratic. The UK is regarded as being highly democratic in that all elections are free from bias and interference. This means that all adults can vote without difficulty in a secret ballot, truly expressing their own opinions. However, the First Past the Post electoral system somewhat undermines the belief of free and fair elections in that smaller parties are subject to the tyranny of the majority, thus have no realistic chance of winning. There is only one representative of each constituency to express the ideologies of all constituents. This means that the constituents are underrepresented. For example, in the 2005 general election, MP of Chelmsford, Simon Burns gained 44.9% of the vote. ...read more.

Middle

This therefore encourages parties to stick by the principles of their manifesto, those that have won them votes. The UK is not democratic in that the party that is in government does not have any legal obligations to legislate the popular policies of their manifesto programme, however the fact that the executive is held to account by legislature means that any unjust, thus undemocratic behaviour is publicised. For example, the Liberal Democrat?s main vote winner was the policy of not increasing the university fees, the fact that Nick Clegg then agreed to the decision of tripling university, has detrimental effects on his party. The electorate that voted for the Liberal Democrats on that basis are now informed, free press publicises immoralities thus resulting in them becoming unlikely to remaining in office over the next term. This gives the electorate the chance to convey their disapproval, the fact that this may only occur once every five years is not truly democratic but more feasible and realistic for a strong Parliament. Since the 1929 women have been able to vote on equal terms with men, this is democratic in that on polling day, parliamentary sovereignty returns to the citizens of the UK. ...read more.

Conclusion

This means we don?t truly have much choice in political parties, consensus politics means that the three main parties are becoming increasingly similar. We are left with very little choice but to vote tactically therefore, not for the party we truly want in power, but for a party that is better than the one that is most similar to your main parties? ideologies. The current political system encourages political apathy in this respect, as it turns voters off by limiting their so called ?freedom of choice?. Many voters see the parties they wish to be in office too small, therefore deem it futile to engage in political participation and vote. Therefore I believe that the UK only appears to be democratic on the surface, the traditions of democracy are now being de-rooted for a new revolution in the tyranny of the majority, overruled by consensus politics. The adversary, differentiating political days are past which encouraged political participation are being trampled upon and pluralist voting only encourages this in that 50%+ does not have to be reached. There is not a major approval therefore of the party in office, this coupled with underrepresentation means the UK is no longer truly a democratic society in that yes we are apparently given the freedom of choice in political parties, but the choice is limited in which party can realistically win. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Government & Politics Revision Notes

    * Fewer votes are 'wasted', therefore greater participation may be encouraged. FPTP may lead people into not voting for what they might see as a wasted cause. * Minority parties might end up with a much fairer representation. * There are more opportunities for independent candidates - only one (Martin Bell)

  2. To what extent is there a consensus in the British party system?

    On the other hand Cameron's Conservatives has shifted it's ideology from "the lower the better" to one which is sufficient in sustaining a high quality public service. The Tories is going into the forthcoming election committed to raising taxes to 45p for those earning more than �150000.

  1. What is the main reason for the loss of faith and interest in our ...

    subject on the national curriculum, the vast majority of UK residents don't have the basic knowledge needed to comprehend the debates and the legislation which is put foreword and discussed in the houses of parliament. Should Government and Politics be a mandatory subject in the Curriculum?

  2. Media or Manifesto?

    but simply been a case of jumping on the bandwagon with them. However it cannot be denied that Blair targeted the Sun as a key point to securing the election, and "courted" it for some time with exclusive interviews and columns.

  1. The Vampires Attack As he walked up the rickety ...

    He realised it was the blood of a vampire! He was invited to sit down by the Minister's assistant who advised that the Minister would be right out. The line of blood led down the plain hallway to a closed door. The Prime Minister wondered what the room could contain.

  2. Is nationalism in the UK reactionary or progreesive??

    The government's 'Citizenship Test', if anything, engenders still further doubt and confusion. England was politically united from the 10th century, with strong links with Scandinavia until the Norman Conquest, and then with France until the 15th century. From the 16th century an English national consciousness developed quite strongly.

  1. Evaluate the effectiveness of the various ways in which participation and democracy could be ...

    absolute co-operation and would only serve to cause complications, increased anger at the government and give rise to other problems. Another way which has been proposed as a means of reducing political disengagement is incentive voting, where people will be given an ?incentive? to vote.

  2. Critically assess the extent to which there is a crisis in participation in UK ...

    which brought together 540 British member organisations in order to press Western leaders over global poverty issues (Hefferenan 2011: 174). The use of celebrities to endorse particular interest groups, namely Joanna Lumley and the Ghurkhas, provides necessary publicity to groups that may be overlooked.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work