• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent would you regard the UK system as truly democratic?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

C) To what extent would you regard the UK system as being truly democratic? (25 marks) Democracy is a general description of a political system that is organised on the basis that government should serve the interests of the people. It is expected that citizens should also influence decisions or make decisions themselves as well as this; the government should be accountable under a democratic society. The UK is regarded as beholding democracy however current trends suggest increasing political apathy have begun to question whether the UK political system is truly democratic. The UK is regarded as being highly democratic in that all elections are free from bias and interference. This means that all adults can vote without difficulty in a secret ballot, truly expressing their own opinions. However, the First Past the Post electoral system somewhat undermines the belief of free and fair elections in that smaller parties are subject to the tyranny of the majority, thus have no realistic chance of winning. There is only one representative of each constituency to express the ideologies of all constituents. This means that the constituents are underrepresented. For example, in the 2005 general election, MP of Chelmsford, Simon Burns gained 44.9% of the vote. ...read more.

Middle

This therefore encourages parties to stick by the principles of their manifesto, those that have won them votes. The UK is not democratic in that the party that is in government does not have any legal obligations to legislate the popular policies of their manifesto programme, however the fact that the executive is held to account by legislature means that any unjust, thus undemocratic behaviour is publicised. For example, the Liberal Democrat?s main vote winner was the policy of not increasing the university fees, the fact that Nick Clegg then agreed to the decision of tripling university, has detrimental effects on his party. The electorate that voted for the Liberal Democrats on that basis are now informed, free press publicises immoralities thus resulting in them becoming unlikely to remaining in office over the next term. This gives the electorate the chance to convey their disapproval, the fact that this may only occur once every five years is not truly democratic but more feasible and realistic for a strong Parliament. Since the 1929 women have been able to vote on equal terms with men, this is democratic in that on polling day, parliamentary sovereignty returns to the citizens of the UK. ...read more.

Conclusion

This means we don?t truly have much choice in political parties, consensus politics means that the three main parties are becoming increasingly similar. We are left with very little choice but to vote tactically therefore, not for the party we truly want in power, but for a party that is better than the one that is most similar to your main parties? ideologies. The current political system encourages political apathy in this respect, as it turns voters off by limiting their so called ?freedom of choice?. Many voters see the parties they wish to be in office too small, therefore deem it futile to engage in political participation and vote. Therefore I believe that the UK only appears to be democratic on the surface, the traditions of democracy are now being de-rooted for a new revolution in the tyranny of the majority, overruled by consensus politics. The adversary, differentiating political days are past which encouraged political participation are being trampled upon and pluralist voting only encourages this in that 50%+ does not have to be reached. There is not a major approval therefore of the party in office, this coupled with underrepresentation means the UK is no longer truly a democratic society in that yes we are apparently given the freedom of choice in political parties, but the choice is limited in which party can realistically win. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Government & Politics Revision Notes

    If satisfied we will vote for the governments party candidate if not we will vote for another. Example, 1997 when voters showed their unhappiness toward the conservatives. * Granting a Mandate to the new government- We are granting authority to whichever party wins the election, this applies to any party

  2. Evaluate the above statement and consider the extent to which you think it is ...

    9 It is interesting to note, however, that quondam Cabinet Minister Clare Short, publicly voiced strong criticism of government policy while in office: her resignation did not follow for a further two months, and she remained in office during the intervening period at the request of the Prime Minister.

  1. To what extent is there a consensus in the British party system?

    On the other hand Cameron's Conservatives has shifted it's ideology from "the lower the better" to one which is sufficient in sustaining a high quality public service. The Tories is going into the forthcoming election committed to raising taxes to 45p for those earning more than �150000.

  2. Media or Manifesto?

    Rupert Murdoch and the Sun followed with support, claiming Blair was "the breath of fresh air this great country needs"13, and that his counterparts, John Major and the Conservatives, were "tired, divided and rudderless". It is clear, judging by Blair's enthusiasm in gaining the support of the Sun, that even

  1. What is the main reason for the loss of faith and interest in our ...

    subject on the national curriculum, the vast majority of UK residents don't have the basic knowledge needed to comprehend the debates and the legislation which is put foreword and discussed in the houses of parliament. Should Government and Politics be a mandatory subject in the Curriculum?

  2. Is nationalism in the UK reactionary or progreesive??

    Catholic, apart from Ulster, which was forcibly settled by Scottish Protestants from the 17th century. In 1801 it was politically united with England under an Act of Union.

  1. Evaluate the effectiveness of the various ways in which participation and democracy could be ...

    absolute co-operation and would only serve to cause complications, increased anger at the government and give rise to other problems. Another way which has been proposed as a means of reducing political disengagement is incentive voting, where people will be given an ?incentive? to vote.

  2. Critically assess the extent to which there is a crisis in participation in UK ...

    This selflessness from celebrities in supporting smaller issues will attract members of the public for support; In a sense Lumley was an excellent marketing device in achieving the Ghurkhas right to settle in the UK.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work