• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

U.S Policy Options Towards Iran's Nuclear Programs

Extracts from this document...


Kurt Wintje PLSC 327 Professor Regan 10/05/06 U.S Policy Options towards Iran's Nuclear Program With the triumph of the Islamic Revolution and the ascendance of Ayatollah Khomeini to power in 1979, the special relationship between the United States and Iran dissolved, and a long rift continuing to this day opened. The U.S broke off official diplomatic relations with Iran in 1980 following the seizure of the U.S Embassy by radicalized students, and the two nations have only had limited official contact ever since (Katzman). It is in this troubled context wherein the ongoing conflict over Iran's nuclear program is unfolding. In 2002, an Iranian dissident revealed the existence of previously unknown nuclear research facilities and the U.S government accused Iran of attempting to make nuclear weapons. The following year the International Atomic Energy Agency accused Iran of failing to report certain nuclear activities and materials, but also declared there was no evidence that Iran was developing nuclear weapons. Multi-lateral negotiations between Iran, France, Germany and Britain regarding the cessation of uranium enrichment as well as an enhanced inspection regime for Iran's nuclear program also began in 2004. ...read more.


Another botched Mid-East occupation could spread chaos and terrorism all over the Middle East, destabilizing other regional U.S allies, which would be disastrous to the U.S economy at home because of the almost certain spike in oil prices (Eisenstadt). If the Bush Administration chooses to go down the regime change path, it will likely take the form of providing financial and other resources to existing Iranian pro-democracy groups whose goal is the overthrow of the current theocratic regime. The U.S has already begun initial moves in this direction by creating Radio Farda, which broadcasts an anti-regime, pro-Western message inside Iran. The U.S has also boosted the number of Persian speaking diplomats in diplomatic missions around Iran, in order to increase coordination with dissident expatriate groups and foster increased Iranian participation in democracy promotion programs. The weakness of the existing groups committed to regime overthrow make this tempting policy option unlikely to succeed, however. Also, the massive overt support that the U.S would need to provide these groups would likely make them even more unappealing to ordinary Iranians, as they will likely be seen as U.S sponsored puppets (Katzman). ...read more.


Further, a crippling strike on Iran's nuclear program will likely move Iran towards pursuing a covert program, completely removed from IAEA inspections. Such a scenario would be disastrous and avoided at all costs (Salama). Until recently, the Bush Administration appeared content to sit on the sidelines while multi-lateral negotiations between Iran and U.S allies occurred. After the talks broke down, the matter was referred to the UN Security Council who voted to order Iran to suspend all uranium enrichment or face sanctions. This is where the matter lies today. Critics accuse the Bush Administration of neglecting the Iranian issue and "outsourcing" diplomacy on the matter to allies, whose views may differ significantly from the U.S and are not worried about serving American interests. In the future, the U.S may need to directly engage with Iran, if only to persuade the rest of the world that the U.S is serious in exhausting all possible options and that drastic action in the form of sanctions - or in the worst possible scenario - military action must be taken (Katzman). Undoubtedly, the Bush Administration faces a number of foreign policy issues in theaters around the world. The Iranian nuclear crisis does not have an easy solution, and each policy option presents risks and rewards. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Middle east section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Middle east essays

  1. Israel and Iran

    This meant that Israel did not have any Constitution, Bill of rights or boundaries and this is the same case that continues today. In Israel, religion also has a large impact when it comes to law. Israel was founded to provide a national home, safe from persecution, to the Jewish people.

  2. Palestinian Middle East

    This is seen in The Bullet and the Ballot Box documentary as Hamas women hand out bags of meat and help families who loose loved ones. Palestinians feel they do not receive compensation from Fatah and decided to vote for Hamas and terrorism, involving the problem of an occupied Palestine.

  1. Armed Islamic Group [ Gia ]

    use of massive car bombs and kidnappings, are similar to those of Hezbollah (Party of God), the pro-Iranian Lebanese Islamist group14 GIA targets both Algerians and others. Intellectuals, writers, journalists, persons involved in mass media, singers-anyone deemed hostile to their "cause"-was a target.

  2. Israel's Security Barrier

    With the construction of the barrier, Israel is clearly taking de facto possession of the Palestinian land, which was occupied during the 1967 war. The only legal way of erecting a fence is therefore the "minimalist" route which would follow the "Green Line," accurately.

  1. Assess the effectiveness of the Arab and Israeli peace initiatives from the 1970s to ...

    cited in Amira Hass, Drinking the Sea at Gaza, trans. by Elana Wesley and Maxine Kaufman-Lacusta (New York: Henry Holt, 1996), 345. Oslo turned Palestine into a checkerboard of Israeli controlled domains interspersed among Palestinian controlled areas. Israeli and Palestinian authorities were supposed to coordinate security to keep both peoples moving easily across the zones.

  2. Assess the relationship between the US and Iraq from 1970 to the present day.

    Saddam's repression continued with a harsh campaign against the Kurds in the North, though both the United States and the UK governments deflected attention from the widespread human rights violations and the regular use of chemical weapons by their ally.

  1. To what extent is the city of Jerusalem vital to the followers of three ...

    According to Islamic belief, prophet Muhammad tied the Buraq to the Wailing Wall, and in Arabic, the wall is referred to as Thawrat al-Buraq. Jews believe that the Dome of the Rock and Masjidal Aqsa were established on the ruins of their First and Second Temples, the first, Solomon's Temple and the second, a reconstructed one.

  2. Nuclear proliferation in Iran

    The security dilemma is meant strictly for the theory of ?why wars start? but for ?why countries seek nuclear weapons? there are different theories. The causes of Iran?s possible proliferation of nuclear weapons as well as their disregard for the international community?s guidelines lie in Scott Sagan?s three models on nuclear proliferation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work