• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

US-IRAN RELATIONS AND ANALYSING MUSHARRAF

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

US-IRAN RELATIONS Ever since the Anglo-American Operation Ajax succeeded in overthrowing the Iranian shah, the United States and Iran have been engaged in a bitter relationship. Today Iran has become a powerful nation that is threatening to use all of her resources to defend herself from an American invasion, which can mean the use of weapons of mass destruction if she actually has any. As proven in the war against Afghanistan or Iraq the United States will not take any chance and will strike Iran if she proves to be a threat to world security. The Iraqi government was accused of possessing weapons of mass destruction although this was never proved neither by the United Nations nor by the United States. The fear of the possibility of the Iraqis being in the possession of such weapons as well as the American wish of overthrowing the Bath government in Iraq led to the Iraqi invasion by the United States. Before the war even took place, the Iranian and Syrian governments publicly condemned the American invasion of Iraq. Although the Iranian government condemned this war, during the first days of war the situation seemed to be positive. After being a week into the war an interview was held in Tehran by Iranian journalists. ...read more.

Middle

The first one would be the "counter-proliferation targeting" which consists in targeting the sites of the weapons of mass destruction. Another target which was set last year was the one of "decapitation." This consists in "overthrowing leadership" and replacing the government with a democratic form of government. "Terrorism targets" is another part of the "contingency planning." The President of the United States has been publicly convincing the people that the Iranians have been crossing the border into Iraq and have been killing Americans. Although this has not changed the opinion of the people Bush continuously tries to find reasons to attack Iran. Before there was even the option of a nuclear attack on Iran but some members of the Joint Chief Staff were very troubled by this and warned the Bush Administration that they would resign if the war was going in that direction. Therefore the plan was cancelled. A year back also five generals and admirals wanted to resign due to with similar excuses. We can see that the war in Iraq is going to be repeated in Iran. The wish of the Bush Administration to declare war on Iran is clear. The United States wants to maneuver the situation like they did against Iraq in order to declare war on Iran. ...read more.

Conclusion

The third possibility is that Osama bin Laden has gone north towards Turkmenistan, Tajikistan or Uzbekistan or gone west towards Iran. This is just a small possibility but it cannot be discarded. The last possibility is Pakistan. "I don't think Osama bin Laden could be in Pakistan," although "anyone can come across those [streams from the Afghani border]." "This border is impossible to seal completely." "There are innumerable routes coming in." There is a possibility that terrorists achieve to enter Pakistan. The ISI (Pakistani Government Intelligence Service) is misled by Musharraf. The Jaish-e-Mohammed terrorist organization, which was behind the kidnapping and murder of the American journalist Daniel Pearl, was linked with the Pakistani Intelligence according to New York Times and the Newsweek. Evidence was found that even his killers might have been agents of the Pakistani government. The Pakistani intelligence under the supervision of Musharraf has played a part in terrorist activities. Peace with India and the War on Terrorism are the major issues Musharraf is faced with. He has encouraged and sponsored terrorist groups in Kashmir and at the same time fails to "completely seal" his borders from Taliban terrorists. "The world is counting on Musharraf to help steer South and Central Asia from local chaos to regional security" although he proves to be inadequate for what is in Pakistani interests. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Middle east section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Middle east essays

  1. The Lebanon Civil War: Syria’s Role in Lebanon

    In that action totally were destroyed several villages in Lebanon and were killed hundreds of people, Lebanese and Palestinian too. After this attack Christian's phalange, for the first tiime have started to reconsider and alter their opinion concerning the Palestinian's presents and status in Lebanon.

  2. Free essay

    Why was the invasion of Iraq so controversial?

    Therefore a new democracy without adequate safety is of questionable value, this post-invasion chaos and no discovery of W.M.D. which was the main justification for war that caused much criticism of the "Bush-Blair policy" after 2003.

  1. Israel and Iran

    Although Israeli law explicitly grants equal civil rights to all citizens regardless of religion, ethnicity, or other heritage, it gives preferential treatment in certain aspects to individuals who fall within the criteria mandated by the "Law of Return". Preferential treatment is given to Jews who seek to immigrate to Israel

  2. UN and Iraq: The Weakest Coalition

    Because security remains of utmost importance in the anarchical society we live in, these factions will continue to fight until the state of Iraq is separated, either by bloodshed or United Nations diplomatic intervention. Like liberals, social constructivists believe in an alternative means of reformation in Iraq.

  1. Why is it difficult to keep peace talks going in the Middle East?

    Another consequence of US-Soviet involvement was on occasion it brought the world close to nuclear disaster. On 17th September 1978 the US president Jimmy Carter acting as go between persuaded Israeli Prime minister Menachem Begin and Egyptian President Anwar Sadat to sign an historic peace settlement on the basis

  2. Palestinian Middle East

    This is a key point for Palestinians to turn to terrorism because their country is suffering and they are receiving rations in water and food. This is making Palestinians more and more furious which is a crucial influence. As a result of the sanctions and poverty increasing Palestinians are suffering

  1. The Syrian Uprising

    Russia has also vetoed the resolution condemning the Bashar Regime. The Iranian Government is also supporting the Bashar Regime. They have aided the government with internet, cell phone and media monitoring technology. They have also aided the government with riot control equipment and snipers.

  2. Nuclear proliferation in Iran

    In Sagan?s paper ?Why Do States Build Nuclear Weapons?: Three Models in Search of a Bomb? he thoroughly discusses the Security Model, Domestic Politics Model and the Norms Model. These models asses the issue on with different schools of thought as well as on different levels of analysis.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work