• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using examples, explain the limitations on the Supreme Courts powers.How do Presidents veto legislation, and how significant is the presidential veto?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Using examples, explain the limitations on the Supreme Court's powers. The president and Congress both have the power to check the Supreme Court in various ways, this is known as 'checks and balances' and was inscribed into the Constitution to avoid tyranny and to encourage a spirit of bipartisanship between the three branches of government. Congress has four significant checks on the Supreme Court. The Senate has the power to confirm or reject appointments made to the Supreme Court by the President, for example following Lewis Powell's retirement President Reagan nominated Robert Bork as associate judge. Lewis Powell was widely considered as a moderate and was often referred to as the 'swing vote' in close decisions; democrats feared the Court would shift the philosophical nature. In the Senate Judiciary Committee headed by Chairman Joe Biden voted 9-5 against the appointment. It is extremely unlikely for a nomination to get confirmed without the support of the committee. It was expected that Bork would withdraw his nomination, however he did not and the vote went to the Senate resulting in 58-42 against his appointment. Therefore it is evident that the President does not always get whom he wants on the Supreme Court and cannot determine the membership of the court and their philosophies of judicial review without the consent of the Senate. ...read more.

Middle

Although Nixon was not officially impeached due to his resignation, he would most certainly have been impeached by Congress had he not resigned. It states in the Constitution the power of pardon is granted to the president "expect in cases of impeachment", therefore one might argue that Ford's pardon was unconstitutional. However, due to the controversy generated by pardons, presidents have significantly decreased its usage and are mostly used in uncontroversial cases. On his final day of his presidency, President Clinton pardoned 140 people including fugitive Mark Rich, whose former wife had made large monetary donations to Clinton's election campaigns and had given expensive personal gifts to the president and the first lady. In contrast, George W. Bush pardoned only 189 people in eight years. There are further, though less significant, checks on the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has no power of initiation; the Court must wait until a case is brought forward. Many presidents, politicians and commentators have been of the view that the War Powers Act (1973) may be unconstitutional. However, the Court has been unable to rule on the matter because no case regarding this Act has appeared before it. The Court possesses no powers of enforcement. In 1954 the Court announced in Brown v. ...read more.

Conclusion

Congress may attempt to override the presidential veto; however with the required two-thirds in both houses this is highly difficult and unlikely. Lastly Congress may realize that they both not have the required votes to override the veto, do nothing and accept that the president has won, this is the most likely overcome of a presidential veto. During Bill Clinton's eight years as president, he used the presidential veto on 36 occasions. Congress attempted to override 13 out of 36, it failed in 11 and only succeeded in just two. Thus, President Clinton won 34 out of 36 occasions when he vetoed legislation. In order to override the presidential veto a required two-thirds majority in both of houses of Congress in needed, therefore the presidential veto is immensely significant. Due to the decrease in bipartisanship in Congress, a bill is unlike to have the majority of support and while it may in the Senate, it may not in the House. The power of veto is inscribed into the Constitution to serve as a check on Congress and encourage a spirit of bipartisanship between Congress and the president. How significant is the role of political parties within Congress? Section B: To what extent is there disagreement about how effectively the Constitution protects freedom? "Members of Congress are more concerned with local issues than with national or international issues." Discuss. "There are no effective checks on presidential power." Discuss. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Are supreme court justices politicians in disguise?

    4 star(s)

    Under Chief Justice Warren, the Supreme Court went under a highly controversial period. These liberal courts took it upon themselves to 'update' the constitution to make it a living document relevant to our times. Roe v. Wade (1973) is a prime example where the Supreme court used the implied right

  2. Explain the significance of the New Hampshire Primary and the Iowa Caucus in the ...

    Iowa however, holds a Caucus and not a Primary, meaning that Iowa has remained the first state to hold any kind of vote on candidates for both parties since 1976. As such, Iowa has been consistently important in presidential campaigns since the 1970s.

  1. Describe the process of impeachment and explain why it is difficult to remove the ...

    A President in the US is more likely to be assassinated in office than to be impeached, so why is it so hard for a President to be impeached? Nixon for example, is possibly the most corrupt President in US history, yet he resigned before there was a chance for him to be impeached.

  2. "Supreme Court Appointments are always controversial" Discuss

    New York City, it declared the Line Item Veto act unconstitutional. Therefore, we can see simply by the powers held by the Supreme Court that appointments have to be controversial, in order to ensure that the right appointment is made.

  1. There is no longer any significant barriers to opporunity for African Americans ~ Discuss

    The average salary for an African-American is ~$30,000 p/a, compared with the ~$49,000 p/a of the average white. Perhaps the most shocking statistic of them all is that on average, one in three black males will be imprisoned in

  2. "What Factors contribute to a 'Failed' presidency? Illustrate your answer with examples from the ...

    success or failure due to his brief reign, his likable characteristics and the overwhelming sense of tragedy of his assassination. The major failing for Kennedy was that people from within Southern States, in his own party, rejected his Civil Right Bill.

  1. '9 politicians sitting on a bench.' Critically evaluate this description of the US Supreme ...

    A similar situation occurred when Clarence Thomas was nominated in 1991. The Senate could have questioned whether he was qualified for the role of Supreme Court justice, but instead chose to focus on his conservative philosophy and sexual harassment allegations.

  2. Critically analyse the appointment and confirmation process for nominees in the US Supreme Court

    For examples the nomination for Harriet Miers was withdrawn by George Bush after many members expressed hostility from members of the president?s own party. Furthermore politicisation on the president?s behalf does not oblige the inaugurated justice to defer to their selector.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work