• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Utilitarianism: Explanation And Study of Criticisms

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Utilitarianism: Explanation And Study of Criticisms The dictionary definition of Utilitarianism is: 'The doctrine that the greatest happiness of the greatest number should be the guiding principal of conduct.' When making a moral decision, we should look at the outcome of an action. Whatever brings the greatest happiness to the most people is the morally 'right' decision. It is a consequentialist principal where the majority rules. It is also relative as each situation is looked at differently and will have a different outcome. Utilitarianism is known as the theory of utility. The meaning of utility is usefulness. Each action is judged by its usefulness in bringing about desired consequences. The word utility was first used to describe a group of social reformers. They attempted to make laws and practices of use-useful to people. One of the earliest Utilitarians to live by this principle was Epicurus - he stated: "Friendship goes dancing round the world proclaiming to us all to awake to the praises of a happy life." Utilitarianism is the view that people should do whatever brings about the most good and the least bad for everyone affected. This is sometimes called "cost-benefit analysis" or "end justifies the means" morality. Usually, the utilitarian thinks "good" means happiness or pleasure. Similarly, the utilitarian calls unhappiness and pain "bad". Problems with utilitarianism in general include the following: We can never know what the consequences of any act or rule maybe. We may try to determine the worth of individuals. The majority maybe permitted to harm the minority. Some actions maybe to terrible to commit, however good their consequences. There are three kinds of utilitarianism: act utilitarianism, rule utilitarianism and preference utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism is concerned with individual acts, while rule utilitarianism is concerned with the rules we follow when we act. Act utilitarians think that we should do whatever act will bring about the most good and the least bad. ...read more.

Middle

Its purity Its extent (the number of people affected by it. He believed that a good life was one with pleasure and the absence of pain. The other exponent of Utilitarianism is John Stuart Mill. He had a strict upbringing having very little contact with the outside world. He was around intelligent people a lot of the time as his father's friends consisted of philosophers, politicians, and economists-one being Bentham. He joined the Utilitarian Society, which met at Jeremy Bentham's house - this is where Mill became interested in the theory. Two of his important books were 'On Liberty' in 1859 and 'Utilitarianism' in 1861. Mill wanted to modify Bentham's theory of Utilitarianism to make it more acceptable. There were a number of things Mill did to change Utilitarianism. Bentham suggested that all pleasures were of equal value; no pleasures were higher or lower than others. This evoked criticism so the main point he made was that of changing qualitative pleasure to quantitative pleasure. He divided pleasure into two, higher and lower. The higher pleasures were associated with the mind, and the lower pleasures with the body. Once the basic lower pleasures of the body (food, water etc.) have been reached, we can then go in search of higher, intellectually challenging pleasures. Mill said: "Better to be a human dissatisfied than a pig satisfied; better to be a Socrates dissatisfied than a fool satisfied." Mill also linked Utilitarianism with Christian morality. He connected the theory with the teachings of Jesus. He said that the 'ideal perfection of utilitarian morality' was abiding by the 'Golden Rule'-'Do onto others as you have them do to you.' This made many more people accept Utilitarianism as it linked with their religion. Mill introduced rules into Utilitarianism. The rules introduced were ones that generally brought about the greatest happiness for the greatest number. For example, Mill argued that society needs the principal of truthfulness as it brings the most happiness on the long run. ...read more.

Conclusion

Surely it is better for a hundred people to be happy than five. There are other ethical theories that have many rules you have to learn and abide by. Utilitarianism has one simple absolute, which can be applied to all situations with a positive outcome. In times of difficulty, it eases people out of difficult situations. They cannot be blamed for making the wrong decision if they claim it was for the happiness of the majority Prejudices the decision maker may hold are eradicated in Utilitarianism, as they have to stick to the main rule. There is some flexibility for emotions in moral decision making according to Rule Utilitarianism. This strand of the theory allows respect for the rules that are created to better our society. Even these rules do not have to be kept all the time if you are a weak rule Utilitarian. Some people would see this kind of Utilitarianism more compassionate than Act Utilitarianism. One of the main strengths is that it prevents the few people that think they better the rest from dictating society. Utilitarianism acts as a good weapon for reform. Utilitarianism is a theory that Christians can relate to. Mill brought it closer to the Christian church by introducing Rule Utilitarianism. This would be closer to the principals Jesus lived by. For example, it was against the Jewish law to work on the Sabbath but when people were in need, Jesus bent this rule and healed them. The largest connection Christianity has with Utilitarianism is the death of Jesus. He was crucified and died for the sins of mankind sacrificing himself for the majority. However, Utilitarianism does accept evil where Christianity most certainly does not. Philosophers like Bentham and Mill worked to produce a theory that could aid us make complex decisions with a desirable outcome. The different types of Utilitarianism make it easier to live by, yet it is hard not to let our emotions override our actions. Despite the many flaws in the theory, it is simple and easy to apply. Isobel Manley ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Analyse the main strengths and weaknesses of Marx's sociological thought.

    3 star(s)

    Therefore leading to conditions being created that will enable workers to see the truth about their lives. Marx stated: "What the bourgeoisie, therefore, produces, above all, is its own gravediggers. Its fall and the victory of the proletariat are equally inevitable."5 C.M, pp.67-68 Although class consciousness replacing false consciousness can

  2. What are the Strengths and Weaknesses of Utilitarianism?

    You have a special responsibility to your mum as she is your family and she brought you up and you both love each other. So this is a dilemma that some utilitarian's may have to face. However there are strengths to the utilitarian theory and this can be seen in Mills improved version of it.

  1. A Study of Carl Rogers' Theory of Personality

    of the characteristics of the "I" or "me" and the perceptions of the relationships of the "I" or "me" to others and to various aspects of life, together with the values attached to these perceptions. (Rogers, 1959, p.200) This gestalt is a fluid and changing process, available to awareness.

  2. ExplainJ.S. Mills version of utilitarianism.

    Therefore he believes that rules are important but there can be circumstances that rules, however good they are, need to be broken, but he also says that all rules should be taken into account in any assessment of the results of the action.

  1. The study of international or rather global politics, seeks to provide an account of ...

    The sovereign as absolute and perpetual power Bodin emphasises power as a characteristic of the state and a citizen as subject to the sovereign power. He classifies a commonwealth as containing three essential elements namely family, sovereign power and common concern.

  2. Iran Country Study

    other chamber where it usually follows the same route through committee and floor action. This chamber may approve the bill as received, reject it, ignore it, or change it. * If only minor changes are made to a bill by the other chamber, it is common for the legislation to go back to the first chamber for concurrence.

  1. Nigeria Country Study

    Britain soon took an interest in the area, and moved to consolidate its hold over what is now modern Nigeria. On January 1, 1901, Nigeria became a British protectorate, part of the British Empire. In 1914, the area was formally united as the Colony and Protectorate of Nigeria.

  2. What is meant by the Clash of Civilisations? What criticisms can be made of ...

    Therefore there is no conflict between civilizations and only the local conflict in which Chechens desire independent state from Russia. To support further, we can argue, Basks separatists or the IRA are not seen as part of different Civilization and so their separatist attempts are not seen as the wars

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work