• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was Bush an imperial President ?

Extracts from this document...


To what extend was Bush an imperial President? An imperial President is referring to a presidency characterised by the misuse and abuse of the powers of the presidency. The Bush administration was seen as imperialistic as it has ignored standing law, violated treaty obligations, undermined the most basic of civil liberties and on the whole, used its powers to avoid congressional, judicial and public oversight. Firstly, terrorist attacks on 11 September 2001 offered Bush an opportunity to reassert presidential leadership. The crisis gave Bush the chance to exercise his constitutional power as commander-in-chief of the armed forces. As such, he was able to launch attacks on Afghanistan as an emergency act of self-defence, without a formal declaration of war of Congress. Additionally, he coordinated the creation of an international coalition and worked to ensure that American military operations ran smoothly. In all these actions, he received the overwhelming support of both Democrats and Republicans alike, and from a broad cross-section of the American people. Therefore, this exemplifies his power as an imperial president. ...read more.


By putting the detainees outside the reach of the U.S. courts, it prohibited challenges to those detentions by writs of habeas corpus. Furthermore, Bush has an overwhelming number of signing statements, far more than any president. As of 2008, he had signed 157 signing statements challenging over 1,100 provisions of federal law. Among the laws Bush said he can ignore are military rules and regulations, requirements that Congress be told about immigration service problems and safeguards against political interference in federally funded research. His most controversial one of all is the signing statement associated with the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005, prohibiting cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment of detainees in U.S. custody. As such, we can see the Bush uses his power of such to make and influence public policy which establishes his imperial presidency. Nonetheless, although foreign policy issues have allowed Bush to exercise his power and to set expansive agenda, his actions have been endorsed by Congress. For example, it was Congress that granted him the extraordinary powers to deal with the 9/11 crisis. ...read more.


For example, in the case of Rasul v. Bush (2004), the Supreme Court ruled that the detainees at Guantanamo Bay did not have access to the US federal courts to challenge their detention regarding the war on terror. Also, in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld (2006), the Court declared unconstitutional the military commissions which the Bush administration had set up to try Guantanamo Bay detainees. As such, this limits the presidential power hence undermines Bush as an imperial president. Lastly, Bush suffered his first veto override in 2007 on the Water Resources Development Bill. He suffered three more veto overrides in 2008. This left him with the lowest success score on vetoes of any modern-day president at just 64%, and the third lowest of any president. He only had a total of just 11 regular vetoes in 8 years. Also, Congress amended the National Defense authorisation Bill in 2007 before allowing Bush to sign it into law. Additionally, the Patriot Act was reauthorized which created new provisions relating to the death penalty for terrorism, enhancing security at seaports and new measures to combat the financing of terrorism. Therefore, this illustrates that Bush's powers are heavily limited by congress which does not make him an imperial president. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Politic- president v PM

    The American system though, due to the 'Separation of Powers' between the Executive and legislative branches, provides a limit to Presidential power over the passage of legislation. The majority, which the Prime Minister can usually rely on, both because of the election system and the use of the Whips is

  2. 'The President faces considerable constraints in domestic policy in comparison to the UK Prime ...

    The manifesto also allows parties to become more greatly coordinated as even before coming into power a party has a set of agreed proposals that no one will reject (e.g. Human Rights Act 1998.) The US Presidents limited power was underlined in 1995 with Minority Leader Tom Daschle openly distancing himself and his Democrat Party from President Clinton.

  1. Discuss the claim that the president is merely 'bargainer-in-chief'

    The president has' special prerogatives' in foreign affairs, this has been acknowledged by both Congress and the Supreme Court. When President Clinton elected to office on a promise to focus 'like a leaser beam' on the economy, he could not avoid 'going international' (Rose 2000).

  2. To what extent is ‘ imperial presidency’ an accurate description of the US president?

    Congress and the president conflict and so the president becomes imperial often due to a conflict in opinion. When Congress does not allow for the actions of the President, he merely steps out of their remit. For instance, in 1940 Roosevelt agreed to give Britain destroyers in return for Caribbean bases.

  1. Sexual Abuse in U.S. Military

    year included, development of a Defense Case Record Management System to synchronize support services requested by and referred for victims.22 Sexual Assault Response Coordinators were also suggested to discuss issues, figure out what has been learned and oversee whether the best practices are being used.23 In an interview with ABC Nightline anchor Cynthia McFadden, Suzanne Swift a U.S.

  2. presidential power how far does it go

    Refer to comments mad Justice Jackson on a case (1952) before the Supreme Court; "We may be surprised at the poverty of really useful and unambiguous authority applicable to concrete problems of executive power as they actually present themselves. Just what our forefathers did envision or would have envisioned had

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work