• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Was the death of Lord Liverpool the most important reason for the collapse of the Tory ministries, 1828-30?

Extracts from this document...


Was the death of Lord Liverpool the most important reason for the collapse of the Tory ministries, 1828-30? The strength of Lord Liverpool, cruelly described by Benjamin Disraeli as the "arch mediocrity," was brought to attention after his death in 1828. It was clear that his moderate stance towards controversial issues had helped to unite a much-divided party. In unifying the "High" and "Low" Tories, the "Catholics" and the "Protestants," Liverpool had succeeded where his successors would fail. However, the post-Liverpool Tories were also weakened by the issue of Catholic Emancipation, whose profile was raised through the infamous County Clare elections. One must further question how Liverpool's survival might have helped the Tories to overcome this ever-present obstacle. The man considered by Gash as "the most underrated Prime Minister in history" would surely have helped. The criticisms of Lord Liverpool's tenure stem largely from the distinct lack of progress within Britain during his reign. With governments in Europe moving towards less conservative and more democratic systems, Britain appeared static. ...read more.


However, Lord Liverpool's stroke occurred after his resignation as Prime Minister. Despite being a much-respected figure, his influence might still have been too weak to salvage the Tory ministries. Certainly, the circumstances inherited by his successors would demand much of any politician. However, Liverpool had won three elections and securely governed the country for eleven years. It was under him that the Napoleonic War was won, instilling in him a legendary status. Romantics had complained about his moderate stance; the poet Shelley said he was a character that "neither sees, nor feels, nor knows." He was also heavily criticised in the popular press for "fail[ing] to contemplate for one moment" the key issues of Catholic Emancipation and parliamentary reform. However, events after his death would explain Liverpool's reluctance to become involved with these contentious issues. Firstly, George Canning's leadership was heavily disrupted by his pro-Emancipation stance; many "Protestants" refused to serve under him and defected, before his untimely death in 1827. Canning's stance had longer repercussions, however; he inspired the younger Tories to form a 'Canningite' faction, which pressed for reform. ...read more.


Furthermore, the Tory ministries themselves were never truly stable. Canning and Goderich may have had parliamentary majorities, but they were always very much contested in the two Houses. One can see that the new generation of Tory ministries was borne into greater difficulties than Liverpool alone could have handled; he would have been thrown into the issues of Catholic Emancipation and parliamentary reform against his will. Thus, his death seems a less important factor. However, I feel the Prime Ministers' failings were of the same level as the circumstances of the time, as the two factors are so heavily linked. On the other hand, more astute politicians may have handled the circumstances better. The failings of Liverpool's successors weakened the Tories position and devalued their ideologies. Furthermore, his survival past 1827 could not have helped alleviate the ministers' circumstances; by that point, he had left his post anyway. Thus, one can see weak politicians placed in extraordinarily pressured conditions could not have sustained the Tory ministries, with or without Liverpool's survival. It was not his "mediocrity" that weakened the Tories, but the fatal timing of his departure. 20/1/2005 Luke Bullen 1 20/1/2005 Luke Bullen ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United Kingdom section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United Kingdom essays

  1. Electoral Systems.

    STV could cause internal party rifts In most cases, party solidarity and loyalty will inhibit individualistic campaigning, and even if this were to happen, a party could exclude a future ticket to a recalcitrant candidate. There is intra-party competition in every election system.

  2. What is the main reason for the loss of faith and interest in our ...

    is certainly a positive step in the right direction, providing the MPs don't think that these plans to monitor and restrict their expenses account isn't just some elaborate April fools prank. What other issues may affect the loss of faith?

  1. Unit 1 - Example of Evaluations

    I would have made sure I had included my record sales figures, as I had to go back and put this in, which meant I had to edit my artists page and this cost my a lot of time, this would also have been avoided if I had planned more carefully.

  2. Disraeli and Modern Conservatism.

    However, he seemed less suited to the demands of wartime, and a revolt of Conservative MPs in the Norway debate of 8-9 May 1940 forced his resignation as Prime Minister. Winston Churchill, an isolated Conservative critic during the 1930s, now became Prime Minister; later in the same year he also succeeded Chamberlain as party leader.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work