• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the advantages and disadvantages of an unwritten constitution in the UK?

Extracts from this document...


What are the advantages and disadvantages of an unwritten constitution in the UK? The UK has an unwritten constitution unlike the U.S.A. Instead Britain's laws, policies and codes are developed through statutes, common law, convention and more recently E.U law. It is misleading to call the British constitution unwritten; a more precise form of classification would be un-codified. This means that the British constitution has no single document, which states principles and rules of a state. However, The British constitution clearly sets out how political power is allocated and where it is legally located. The British constitution is still visible and it defines composition and powers of the main offices and institutions of the state. ...read more.


Changes to the British constitution reflect a changing balance of power. The constitution is important even though it is not written form because it formed the basis of the separation of power that we now have, for example between the Lords and the Commons. This also shows the flexibility of the constitution. An advantage of the UK constitution is that it takes into account of changing views. For example, in 1997 the changing of the hereditary peer system and also further reforms to change the structure of parliament. It is good that the British constitution will always takes into account these changes. However, there are disadvantages to an un-written constitution. A written constitution is considered the highest form of law and is respected because of this. ...read more.


set out individual freedoms and rights of British citizens, in a written constitution the public are clear about what their rights are and they can hold the government accountable if they appear undemocratic. However, an unwritten constitution is still more advantageous than a written one, mainly because a written one is too inflexible and rigid. Written constitutions of other countries have become out dated because it is not easy to change and amend. In conclusion, the British constitution seems to be old fashioned and much of it symbolic. However, an un- written constitution such as the UK's is positive as it provides fluidity and adaptability as laws and policies can be changed to reflect the opinions of a changing society. The British constitution can be seen as reflective and flexible. ?? ?? ?? ?? Amandeep Dhaliwal ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level United States section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level United States essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    "The Main Difference Between the UK And US Constitution Is That One Is Flexible ...

    4 star(s)

    Britain is a unitary state rather than a Federal one like in the US. In a unitary state, power lies with central government. But this is less so since devolution, which has distributed some power to Wales and Scotland, thus, removing power from Westminster.

  2. What are the advantages and disadvantages of an unwritten Constitution?

    With the possibility of having a written constitution the issue of considering who would write it would be one of great disagreement and debate. It would cause a great degree of pressure in locating a single group, or individual of a neutral position.

  1. US pressures groups are undemocratic, discuss

    Furthermore their boards are self appointed not elected and they are not normal working class people so they could be out of touch with public opinion and will be representing the more affluent American society. Those groupings that do have an open, democratic structure are dominated by the wealthiest sections

  2. Discuss the arguments for and against a codified constitution

    An uncodified constitution does not require a supreme court. If a state has a codified constitution, it must have a supreme court, a court that interprets the constitution. The problem with that is that it brings judges into disputes with the legislature (parliament)

  1. Does the UK have a 'constitution'

    Instead it is made up of common law, statute law and convention. Of all the democratic countries in the world, only Israel is comparable to Britain in having no single document codifying the way its political institutions function and setting out the basic rights and duties of its citizens.


    in which Britain joined the European Community. A second source of the British Constitution is The Royal Perogative. This encompasses all functions performed by ministers acting on behalf of the Monarch; their authority derives from the Crown, not Parliament. The Royal Perogative is executed by orders in counsel or through proclamations and writs under the Great Seal.

  1. How is Britain's constitution changing in the 21st century?

    'Most member states agree QMV is desirable' however each has areas they consider inviolable, and obviously these areas are not congruent (Dillon and Castle, 2000). Britain is being reviled by some of the core EU countries and as recognised by Waugh and Castle, Blair has been criticised by French and

  2. Comparison of US and UK Constitution

    The sheer flexibility of the UK constitution has also allowed for the development of the European Union and for EU legislation to be incorporated into the UK constitution, which has dramatically altered the UK political system moving ever closer to being a federal state in the European realm.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work