• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the advantages of utilitarianism?

Extracts from this document...


Utilitarianism 7 a) What are the advantages of utilitarianism? (10 marks) The ancient Greeks devised the belief that our lives should revolve around achieving pleasure, and Epicurus, an ancient Greek philosopher and a hedonist believed that pleasure was the sole good in life and pain the sole evil. Eudemonia, meaning 'happiness' and 'living life to your potential' was the term adopted by Plato and Aristotle to describe the goal in life. This happiness could be the result of both physical and intellectual satisfaction. Utilitarianism is an ethical theory devised by Jeremy Bentham, that focused primarily on the idea of promoting happiness when making moral decisions, where decisions are made applying the principle of utility, which states that 'an action is right if it produces the greatest good for the greatest number.' Utilitarianism appears to have many advantages, its strengths revolving around its consideration of consequence, as it seems natural to consider the consequences of an action when deciding what to do. The principle appears to encourage a democratic approach to decision making, as the majority's interest is always considered, and the dangerous minority is not allowed to dominate. The theory certainly does not support individual pursuits that are at the expense of the majority. Jesus' also supports this in the Bible preaching in the ethic of love, requiring men to work for the well being of others, 'Do to others as you would have them do to you.' ...read more.


It is important to think about the implications of only considering the consequences, and look further into what the theory attempts to do. It is through doing this, that weaknesses begin to appear, and we start to ask questions. The theory fails to consider different views on happiness is and does not answer the question of 'What is pleasure?' as it is different for different people. People have different tastes and often disagree on what gives them pleasure and pain. It appears straightforward to use Bentham's hedonic calculus, which measures amounts of pleasure and pain according to criteria including intensity, duration, certainty, extent, remoteness, richness and purity. However, this leads us to ask the question of whether different pleasures and pains can be so easily quantified. Surely it is not possible to compare seeing children grow up to eating a chocolate bar, how can these pleasures be quantified? This also leads to the idea of pleasure not being the ultimate and exclusive goal as few pleasures are completely pure, most have a measure of pain mixed in with them. Surely pain is good sometimes as it can lead to pleasure (in extreme cases there are people who find pleasure in experiencing pain) and is there for a reason. ...read more.


right if and only if it conforms with that learnable set of rules, the adoption of, which by everyone would maximise intrinsic value' It allows us to establish rules to guide our conduct which will promote the general happiness of humanity and which will hold good stead in most situations. The key difficulty however, was established by R. M. Hare which he identified as the distinction between generality and universality. He argued that the rules had to be universal so they could apply to any act even if the act's circumstances are highly specific. General rules lay down broad principles without considering exceptions and special circumstances such as slavery. This is permitted even though it appears to be morally unacceptable, as minority interests are not protected. Utilitarianism has problems causing it to be seen in an unacceptable light. This is because it allows 'morally wrong' actions, fails to consider the full consequences, ignores the minority, does not make allowances for special responsibility or justice and mentions nothing of how to determine 'happiness.' The interests of everyone do not appear to be protected and feelings for individuals concerning special responsibility appear to be ignored. Finally there is the idea of the end justifying the means - as long as the end result is good then whatever is done to achieve it does not matter. Caroline Neal 12M ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Analyse the main strengths and weaknesses of Marx's sociological thought.

    3 star(s)

    It is more difficult to distinguish between economic domination and military, political and ideological relations. Therefore, Marx would need to discuss relations between the economic, political and ideological aspects of social life under capitalism. One could also claim that there is a complex relation between human action and the underlying social structures.

  2. Advantages and disadvantages of utilitarianism

    and extent of the pleasure. It would therefore be theoretically possible to calculate whom it was morally right to rescue first from a fire; a child, a pregnant woman, an old man or a scientist who possesses the formula for the ultimate cure for cancer.

  1. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the system of choosing presidential candidates.

    In the case of third parties or independents, who don't have the financial support and organisation behind them, only the wealthy or the famous have been selected for candidacy and had notable impact. When Ralph Nader affected the outcome of the 2000 election, he had the advantage of being a

  2. What exactly is Weber's Protestant Ethic Thesis?

    Therefore nothing really influences God's decision, for if it could, that would turn 'grace' into God's side of a transaction, rather than it being a pure gift. Whether one was among those saved became the urgent question for Protestants, which was the meaning or rationale for their social actions, Weber believed.

  1. So, whats wrong with Anarchism?

    However the core idea of this theory is that it expects humans to work together for the good of the collective rather than for their own interest. This would be hard to achieve because in order to organise a collective unit there would be need for someone to organise events

  2. John Stuart Mill was the son of a philosopher who worked with Jeremy Bentham. ...

    Following this, Mill believed in higher pleasures and lower pleasures, and that the higher pleasures were more fulfilling than the lower.

  1. Utilitarianism theory was developed first by Jeremy Bentham. His student John Stuart Mill who ...

    Its fecundity (or productive) or the chance it has of being followed by sensations of the same kind (in other words how likely the action will result in other pleasures or the repeat of the pleasure) 6. Its purity or the chance it has of not being followed by sensations of the opposite kind (pain).

  2. Year 12 Essay On Utilitarianism

    and that humans would always seek pleasure and avoid pain at all costs. To measure the pleasure he devised the hedonic calculus, which consisted of seven principles each of which could be given a numerical score. These consist of its intensity, duration, certainty or uncertainty, propinquity or remoteness, fecundity, purity and possibly wit.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work