• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the Challenges and Opportunities of the proposed enlargement of the EU in 2004?

Extracts from this document...


What are the Challenges and Opportunities of the proposed enlargement of the EU in 2004? In May of 2004, the European Union is set to take on the largest amount of members it has ever done so at one time. This will unarguably turn the EU into the largest single trading bloc in the world. The ten countries intending to join are mainly East European: Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Poland, Slovakia and Slovenia. As can be seen, this will balance the European Union a little more favourably towards the East. This huge enlargement of the EU will obviously create many opportunities and benefits for both existing members states and new candidates, but with an accession of this scale there are numerous hurdles and obstacles to clear, which will be examined. The expansion will cost approximately �25 billion over three years. The EU will spend �40 billion, but new members will pay �15 billion altogether. This sum divided by 370 million, the population of the EU puts the cost of enlargement per individual at �66 or �45. Although some regard this as money they would rather put to a different use, it is important to remember that the cost of German reunification from 1990 to 1999 was �600 billion. ...read more.


It is felt by many that the adoption of European law is a loss of sovereignty, but it has been argued by some that sovereignty itself as a concept has much less meaning in today's world, where inter-dependence is far more important than independence and autonomy. This enlargement will create the largest single trading market in the world, which it is believed will in turn boost investment and employment, as well as increasing EU influence on the world stage. Added to this is the historical notion that Europe will finally be fully united after years of war, as well as the ex-soviet Baltic states being able to consolidate the political and economic transition which has gone on for over ten years. As French President Jacques Chirac said in December 2002 at the Copenhagen summit: "One cannot but think this evening of the victims of the numerous wars of the 20th Century, the absurd deaths... the victims of anti-Semitism and racism, of all the catastrophes... and man's folly."1 Well spoken sentiments, however, have not been enough to curb the challenges and problems this enlargement has faced. The principal problem has been Turkey, which has been postponed from talks for two years, mainly due to concerns over breaches of human rights. As well as this the concerns are cultural and Geographical. ...read more.


The final problem is Cyprus. The island is still not reunified and it is only the Southern Greek Cypriot side which is internationally recognized and could be a part of the European Union. These problems tend to pale in comparison to the advantages and opportunities which will be created for the new EU states themselves. Members will not have to pay tariffs and will have high access to all member states. They will also be protected from outside markets. Eight out of the ten joining in 2004 are emergent democracies. The transition from Communism to Capitalism is always very costly, and with EU membership far more investment will be put into these countries through the two European recovery funds, the ERDF and ESF. Although not a view I take myself, many call this a 'reward' for the 'achievements' of losing communism. One of the most important things these smaller states will gain is a much higher international status. This breeds a stronger political status and more 'clout' at the higher level, for example the EU ambassador to the UN. Whatever your views are on the European Union, if all of these obstacles are cleared, then on May 1st 2004, 10 more countries and approximately 750 million people will join the organization. This will hopefully mend the huge tear in Europe that the Cold War created, and improve the lives of many people. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. A clear explanation of key underpinning economic theories relevant to the EU.

    This treaty was approved at Maastricht in Netherlands by the 12 heads of government of the European Community in December 1991 and signed on February 7th 1993. This treaty states that: *To promote economic and social progress, which is balanced and sustainable *Strengthening of economic and social cohesion *Establishing an

  2. Regulation 2560/2001 on cross-border payments in Europe.

    At present, it is not advisable to apply the principle of uniform charges for paper cheques as by nature they cannot be processed as efficiently as the other means of payment, in particular electronic payments. However, the principle of transparent charges should also apply to cheques.

  1. "To what extent will the proposed EU constitution affect, the procedure for EU/EC negotiation ...

    Furthermore, the ERTA case appeared to suggest that the competence of the Community in this area was exclusive and the Member States were precluded from acting. The Court went on to confirm that the Council's proceedings of the 20th of March 1970 were within the framework of the Community and

  2. Transformation of the U.S. Hegemony in Europe through NATO after the Cold War

    However, considering the size, functionality and effect of NATO in the beginning of the post-cold war era, as Glaser discussed, it provided the best option for security of Europe despite the developments at Maastricht13. However, by time, NATO and EU started to have increasing effect on each other and their

  1. Austria - An economic and political overview.

    Italy and the UK remained more in the middle. Conclusion Now that the whole problematic seems a little over, or at least at a rest stop, one wonders what the near future holds for Austria. It seems fairly obvious that the democratically elected coalition government will try and go about

  2. EU enlargement essay.

    This is relatively a less economically developed country compared to the rest of the EU, which at first look is not entirely a good thing. But Poland seems to be linked to the EU countries in some way -through wars which is a good thing for Poland; it may give them a stronger decision on them joining.

  1. The French Revolution

    Paine was responsible for politicising the lower orders and demanded social reforms including free education, old age pensions and family allowances, all of which were to be financed from income tax. Therefore, the French revolution created many ideas of anarchism based on the principles taught through the ideas of the Enlightenment thinkers.

  2. The Importance of the Cyprus Issue in terms of the Accomplishment of the ESDP

    the other party, and now it is far too late to expect the UN to prevent the EU from interfering into the dispute, which is normally under the jurisdiction of the UN. The EU - Turkey - Cyprus Triangle The European Union has the opportunity to play a constructive role in the resolution of the Cyprus conflict.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work