• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"What are the long-term Jewish and Palestinian claims to the land of Israel?"

Extracts from this document...


"What are the long-term Jewish and Palestinian claims to the land of Israel?" One of the main reasons why the conflict in the Middle East between the Jews and the Palestinian Arabs is so bad is to do with the long term claims to the land. Both the Arabs and the Jews believe that the land is rightfully theirs because of the long term settling which both sides have taken part in. The Jews believe that they own the land because they think that in c.1200 BC Moses led God put them into the area of Palestine and so according to the Old Testament Jews in Palestine. It was not only religion that made them think that they deserved the land; they also feel that they needed it. The Romans had conquered Palestine after a periodic resistance by the Jews around 63 BC. But after revolt the Jews were forced to leave Palestine and were dispersed (this was called Diaspora) throughout the Roman Empire around 135AD. Ever since the Jews were forced out of Palestine they had always longed to return, every year at Passover they would hope that the next year they would be in Palestine. ...read more.


The Jews needed to feel safe after being attacked by many European countries, such as France and Russia, simply because of their anti-Semitic views. A book called "The Jewish State" was published which was the beginning of a political movement called Zionism. Zionism would allow the people to live safely in their own way. The Zionists made an agreement with the Sultan of Turkey, to allow the Jews to move into Palestine. By 1914 85,000 Jews were in Palestine. The Zionists not only wanted to be in Palestine to feel safe but also because they wanted to live in a Jewish area, with Jewish people. The Arabs wanted to rule the area them selves. They hated the idea of Turkish people interfering with their lives and customs. The Turks were making a massive empire, and when they ruled the Arabs country they gave them no independence, which is why the Arabs wanted to rule again. The Turks were making the Arabs lead the Turkish way of life. They made them speak Turkish, the made them follow the Turkish national dress, and they also persecuted any Arabs who resented the Sultan, or resented his allowance of Jewish immigration. ...read more.


This would make the Arabs feel betrayed by the English as the land they thought they would be getting has now got to be shared with the Jews, and the British government were making interfering decisions without the consent of the Arabs. When both sides has seen that Britain has been promising both sides land then this would make them less likely to make peace because Britain, potentially a peace making country is now ruled out of helping as both the Jews and the Arabs would hate the British, so would not want to communicate with them to make a new deal, especially after they betrayed and lied to them after World War one. All of the above make peace harder to get to, the long term claims makes both sides believe that the land is already theirs, for religious reasons or just simply already being there. The nationalist argument means both the sides are wanting independence and would be willing to fight (there fore not being peaceful towards each other). And finally the war makes it even harder for the British especially to help make peace between the two countries. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Middle east section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Middle east essays

  1. Free essay

    The State of Irael is not the Promised Land

    which guided the poorest of Jews to the richest on how to run there new country if they succeed in gaining one. Can the state of Israel be the Promised Land or is it just a piece of land, but it has to be considered apart of the jewish faith

  2. What are the long term Jewish and Palestinian claims to the land of Israel?

    Due to both these cultures wanting their own nation, we can also see that the Jews and Arabs were not going to live together peacefully. The Jews and Arabs both believed that Palestine should be their own land and independent state, for the British had promised them both that they could live in Palestine.

  1. The Jewish State

    After the downfall of his marriage, he went into the world searching for who he was and what he was doing to do with his life. He joined one of the biggest newspaper companies in Austria called " Neue Freie Presse".

  2. Why was the State of Israel successfully established in 1948?

    However Britain's post war policy of preventing Jewish immigration to Palestine was also influential in creating sympathy for the Jews especially in America. This was best shown in July 1947, when Britain refused to allow 4,500 Jewish survivors of the Holocaust to land in Palestine.

  1. Jewish Diaspora.

    Thus, the dispersion of the Jewish people to lands outside of Israel began. This has come to be known as the Jewish Diaspora (Dee-ahs-porah). The Jewish Diaspora is probably one of the least-known events in history, even though it has been important to every country in the world.

  2. The land of Israel, home of the holy land Jerusalem, has been around for ...

    (Frenkel 157) As stated by Frenkel the Israeli culture is torn between becoming a modern city and remaining traditional, which is causing problems in the society. Israel is perceived as being overwhelmed by three different sets of ongoing conflicts consisting between Jews and Arabs, secular and religious Jews, and new immigrants and old-timers.

  1. The role of International law in regards to The Palestinian Dilemma.

    On the basis of such a legal concept, national Palestinian sovereignty was not to be exterminated, specifically when Britain was assigned by the League of Nations with the mandate over Palestine. Henry Cattan, the International jurist who represented the Arab Palestinians came up with the conclusion that "The legal effect

  2. Arab Claims to Palestine - What is the Arab historical connection with Palestine? What ...

    Throughout the whole period of the caliphate, the Syrians, the Persians, the Egyptians, and others, as Moslem converts or as Christians or Jews, were the foremost bearers of the torch of enlightenment and learning. The result was a great volume of translation from the ancient writings of a host of cultures in East and West alike, from Greece to India.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work