• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"What are the main strengths and weaknesses of Marxist histories"?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Matt Eagles "What are the main strengths and weaknesses of Marxist histories"? Marxist theories ultimately have their ambitions set upon social upheaval of whatever current system of governance is in place and the replacing of it with the idea of Communism. At the fulcrum of these Marxist theories is the concept of class struggle throughout history. "The history of all hitherto existing society is the history of class struggles." (Communist Manifesto) An immediate potential weakness within the Marxist school of thought could be the apparent cynicism that is apparent throughout. To grasp the idea that man is no more in control of his existence and circumstances is a daunting and uneasy way of approaching the interpretation of history. "It is not the consciousness of men that determines their existence, but, on the contrary, their social existence that determines their consciousness." (Marx, in the Preface to A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy.) However the driving force of Marxist histories is derived from the question of class struggle and in particular that Marx emphasized the forthcoming clash between the development of material life and the superstructure it exists within and stabilizes. Marx illustrated his ideas most prominently by the example of capitalism supressing the proletariat and by the prediction of the development of socialism, and ultimately communism from capitalism. ...read more.

Middle

Through Marx's perception of Materialism it is the understanding that reality is only material: matter and energy. There are not Gods or any supernatural phenomenon, politics and beliefs exist solely due to economic climate and positioning. Induced by the ruling classes throughout history to serve as means of social control, this is directly related to the question surrounding the struggle of class and the argument of False Consciousness. Again contrary to Hegel's work of Idealisms Marx indeed "stands him on his head". However to abandon the widespread beliefs that are commonplace in most societies is a weakness as to the widespread acceptance of Marxist historical teachings. For example, through practical everyday life wage-labourers reproduce themselves physically, i.e. work to earn money in order to buy food, shelter and clothing they need to survive. This is at the heart of Historical Materialism. Wage-labourers as part of their "jobs" engage in production, production of the things they need to buy in order to survive. An underlying theme then to the class struggle is the capitalist way of ruling without mercy. The capitalist system being based on private ownership of the means of production, which gives the power to very few. Marx himself mounted a full-scale attack on the theories, institutions, and philosophies of industrial capitalism. ...read more.

Conclusion

The resulting system was that socialism, would bring a society which was based on collective ownership of the means of production, rational economic planning, equal distribution of goods and services, and lastly, production for the human need, the example of the Marxist dialectic in full swing. Marx focuses on the theory of history rather than an empirical way of telling history how it is. Unlike historians such as Elton who believe in absolute objectivity or Carr with theories of selection and invention of fact, Marx's perception of histories tend to cross into philosophical and cultural debates as well as those of historiographical nature. Marx can ultimately be attributed to the emergence of histories regarding groups of people rather than the individual being available and is an indication of Marxists histories relevance and one of its strengths. Contrary to this can individuals be disregarded throughout history as in Marxist teachings. According to Marx the importance of the individual is benign due to the social climate of the time and economic position the individual is privy to taking precedence over and rubbishing any innate talent or ability that key political or historical figures may possess. This almost fatalistic attitude has such strong cynical roots it may be a step to understanding the shroud of uncertainty as to the acceptance and understanding of Marxist histories. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Analyse the main strengths and weaknesses of Marx's sociological thought.

    3 star(s)

    All human beings must employ the forces of production in order to meet basic economic needs. However, there has always been one class of persons who have owned the means of production. Marx argued that it is this ownership which leads to the most essential fact of materialist theory of

  2. Discuss the conflicts between Employee and Employer by Marxist

    3.2 In Marxism 3.2.1 Labour Power What we have to be clear about is what the capitalist has bought. The worker has sold not his labour but his ability to work. This Marx calls his labour power. Also, as Marx defines, 'labour power is the abstraction of human labour into

  1. Power and Politics in Organizations: Public and Private Sector Comparisons

    When these groups lie outside the Iron Triangle, they are far less inhibited by considerations of equilibria then when they are inside it. This single-issue focus is indeed one of the reasons why even small and not well-financed public

  2. What did Karl Marx mean by 'exploitation' in a capitalist economic system?

    Another prediction by Marx was that the working class would be subject to increasing misery as the development of capitalism approached its climax. Capitalism would be obliged, he thought, to keep wages low and hours long. If capitalism could not find markets for the output of its steadily increasing productive

  1. An analysis of the Marxist Perspective on Religion

    opium helps people to avoid having to face what is going on until it is over. In this situation, religion is turned to with the hope that 'real distress' will be eliminated, and that somehow, faith in God will make this process quicker.

  2. A Comparison of Marx's and Rousseau's Philosophies.

    Marx wanted to abolish the family because he thought that it is nothing but a convention for the sole purpose of making money. Religion: According to Rousseau, religion was inescapable, bu he disapproved Christianity, as he considered it as weak and masochistic faith.

  1. An analysis of the Marxist perspective on religion

    you still have a headache, but without the pain that accompanies it you believe your headache is gone. Given that pain is your body's way of saying that something is wrong, taking a drug to cover the pain is obviously the foolish thing to do in the long term.

  2. Why does Marx believe that capitalism will inevitably give way to socialism?

    The struggle between the two led to the moving to the sequential economic system - capitalism. Capitalism emerged from feudalism partly due to the conflict discussed above. Feudal society consisted mainly of peasants tilling small plots of land in order to provide for themselves and to make a livelihood.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work