• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the Strengths and Weaknesses of Utilitarianism?

Extracts from this document...


What are the Strengths and Weaknesses of Utilitarianism? The utilitarian approach to deciding what the right thing to do is to try and make the most amounts of people happy. Both Bentham and Mill believed this, they were both hedonists, believing that the most important thing in life is to be happy. However their theories differed in the way they measured pleasure. Bentham measured happiness considering the quantity of pleasure whereas Mill measured it by the quality of happiness that would occur. The main weakness of utilitarianism is to do with the problem of consequences. When we use Bentham's theory we are unable to predict the future so as to see how our decisions will affect people later on. There is no way of telling for sure what the consequences of our actions will be, we just do what we think is right at that specific time. ...read more.


Another weakness of the utilitarian theory is the problem of special responsibilities. You have a certain responsibility and duty to your family and the closest people around you. Generally you regard these people higher than say a complete stranger. To explain this, an example could be that there is a bus crash. You can only get one person out of the bus and your mum is stuck on the bus but there is also a scientist who, in his mind, has the cure for cancer. Who would you pick out of the two people? This would prove a problem for a utilitarian because they have to consider how many people would be made happy by saving either their mum or the scientist. If they were to save the scientist then millions of people could be cured of cancer and this is generally what a utilitarian would choose but then you have let your own mother die. ...read more.


Mill has been said to be a rule-utilitarian, meaning he thought there needs to be some general rules, not binding but guidelines which if need be, can be broken. They need to consider the consequences of an action in the long term, not just the here and now. Whether an act is good or bad is determined by the results that follow the act. He believed it was the end not the means that count. An example of this could be if someone breaks the rule, 'never lie' in order to spare someone's feelings. This would create more hedons than telling the truth and hurting their feelings. The final strength of utilitarianism is that if everyone in the world applied this principle to their entire decision making, then the whole world would be as happy as it could possibly be. If everyone obeyed the rule 'don't murder' no one would be murdered and that would make the most amount of people happy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Analyse the main strengths and weaknesses of Marx's sociological thought.

    3 star(s)

    Marx saw societies as social systems which could be divided into two parts: the economic base and the superstructure. The economic base contained a particular mode of production as well as the economy and class relations.

  2. "What are the main strengths and weaknesses of Marxist histories"?

    A full revolution of events and transference of power occurs and after which there is an element of stability regained. Marxist dialectic goal was the eventual progression towards the synthesis emerging as total socialism or communism.Marx used Hegel's ideas and applied them to classes of people throughout history.

  1. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the system of choosing presidential candidates.

    which used the primary system to circumvent traditional party power brokers; thus candidates are less beholden to Party "fat-cats." This weakening of ties between the Party and a presidential candidate has arguably resulted in the election of 'lame-duck' presidents, less able to govern once in office because they cannot rely on the support of party colleagues in Congress.

  2. So, whats wrong with Anarchism?

    they did in Catalonia where they called themselves Revolutionary Defence Council in order to give the wrong impression that they were not in a real government12. However by April 1937 a civil war between the communists and the anarchists broke out in Barcelona where 500 people were killed, after this

  1. Notes on John Stuart Mill's On Liberty

    d) Consenting adults: Lastly, if two (or more) people are engaging in an activity to which they both consent, then the activity should not be considered as involving harm to others even if the people are causing harm to each other. For example, if you and I agree to a boxing match, then the government should not forbid

  2. ExplainJ.S. Mills version of utilitarianism.

    Whereas when Mill expanded on Bentham's theory his was called Rule Utilitarianism. Mill expanded on Bentham's theory by proposing that there is a positive place for rules within the utilitarian approach, this is why mill's theory of utilitarianism is sometimes referred to as Rule Utilitarianism.

  1. Does J.S.Mill abandon Utilitarianism?

    satisfied"6, is what Mill wrote with regards to the distinction between higher and lower pleasures. Instead of looking at the quantity of pleasure, Mill begins to look at quality instead. However the problem with the higher and lower pleasure theory is that in order to make a distinction between the

  2. Explain Bentham's version of Utilitarianism.

    Good, in Bentham's eyes, is the maximum amount of pleasure with the minimum amount of pain and bad is the maximum amount of pain afflicted to people and the minimum amount of pleasure. This then means that his utilitarian theory is a democratic one.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work