• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What Has Been the Impact of Greater European Integration on British Government & Politics? The Unification of Europe.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What Has Been the Impact of Greater European Integration on British Government & Politics? The Unification of Europe Although Britain's involvement in what is now known as the European Union did not begin until a relatively long way into its existence, I feel that for reasons of context that its history is noteworthy. The origins of the concept of a unified Europe became prominent in the post-war period of the late 40's and into the 50's. Many would, somewhat ironically, place the onus on Winston Churchill who suggested the creation of a "United States of Europe" to deal with the issues that many struggled to contend with after the decimation of wide areas of Europe. However, the idea of unity within Europe was conceived of not just to create a climate in which peace could be prominent, but also to deal with the economic difficulties that much of Europe faced. War had not only destroyed many physical aspects of the European states, the semblance of economical stability that some parts had enjoyed had also been obliterated. Those that had been in difficulty during the inter-war period suffered this realism further. It was primarily for these economic factors that formal bodies were formed, with the first, the Benelux Customs Union, coming into effect in 1948. ...read more.

Middle

Both parties seem to have done a u-turn on their previous policies, with New Tory/Labour (delete as applicable) broadly speaking in favour of Europe, with some dissention in the ranks, and following their recent trend, we see a polarised Conservative party struggling to find itself. The Institutions of the EU The EU comprises numerous institutions, which fall under the two broad categories of Intergovernmental and Supranational. Accountability is a major concern for the EU, as many bodies it may be argued, have a 'Democratic Deficit', that is, a lack of accountability. There are many examples of unelected bureaucrats, similar to those that sit on Britain's many quasi-autonomous non-governmental organisations, holding decision-making power. With regards to the implementation of ideas within the European infrastructure, there are many bodies that deal with this area. The Council of Ministers (an intergovernmental body) is the decision making body of the EU, with the power to approve or dismiss proposals, but also the power to issue regulations, directives, recommendations and resolutions. The Council is in reality as series of councils, each dealing with matters appropriate to its members. The members are directly elected MP'S in their own countries, for example Jack Straw is Foreign Minister for Britain and sits on the Council of Foreign Ministers, and so is accountable. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, British insistence led to the phrase "ever closer union" being substituted for "federalism". Although Britain is the main protagonist in the fight against federalism many other European nations have shown great scepticism, as highlighted by the Amsterdam Treaty. Subsidiarity is the policy that both the Supranationalists and the Intergovernmentalists believe will be their saving grace. This is the idea that all decisions should be taken at the level most appropriate to their sphere of influence, that is, at the lowest appropriate level. The Committee of the Regions is the body that oversees this principle. The reason that this principle is so popular is that both contrary schools of EU thought believe that it will serve their purpose, which to some extent it will. The Supranationalists are happy, as they believe it will encourage greater interdependence, and the Intergovernmentalists believe it will stop there greatest fear, a Federal European Superstate, ever coming into existence. Another prominent issue is the perceived loss of sovereignty that membership of the union entails. It is true that British law is now subordinate to EU law, a fact made painfully obvious to the government with the Factortame case and many more like it since. This case highlighted not only that the ECJ can at any time overrule UK statutes, but also that we have lost control over a plethora of domestic issues, encompassing many economic and social factors. Tim Collins Page 1 5/2/2007 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level European Union section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level European Union essays

  1. Why did Britain join the EEC in 1973 and not in 1957?

    Britain would keep the EEC friendly towards America, meaning it was not as likely the EEC would become a 'Third Force' in the World and turn away from NATO.

  2. Why did the witch-craze happen in Early Modern Europe?

    did not succeed in achieving a dominant position in European intellectual circles and was never able to change the mind-set generation circles of lawyers and clerics. It also failed to deny the existence of the Devil and the efficacy of magic13.

  1. Has Europe become a federal superstate?

    The free movement of people within different members of the EU is another sign of federalism, as the very concept or notion of the nation state and borders is decreased. For the purposes of international recognition and definitional basis, one is considered European in terms of legislation.

  2. The aim of this essay is to present the reason of British government changing ...

    grouping which, as their own economic problems grew and their independent influence in the world declined, it proved impossible to ignore.3 In 1961, with the EEC's apparent economic success, the United Kingdom changed its view and began negotiations toward EEC membership.

  1. The Institutional Consequences of Domestic Politics on Africa's International Relations and Regional Cooperation.

    when given a government job, may be a governor, he will embezzle public fund and become corrupt. While he was the chairman of a town union, he was poorer and never touched the people's money but turns a rogue as a public office holder.

  2. Why did many British colonies demand independence from Britain in the years immediately after ...

    Britain joined the EEC so they can get good economical advantages to do with money and business. Being in the EEC means that British manufacturers can sell to a large market anywhere in the EEC. The CAP means that farmers in Britain can get high prices for their meat, dairy products and crops etc.

  1. To what extent were Political and Economic reasons responsible for post 1945 European Integration.

    In 1969 the EEC was re-launched and by 1973 Britain joined Ireland and Denmark to turn the six into nine. By now the post war boom had ended and economic strength and unity was seen as crucial to survival. The seventies saw ideological and economic steps towards wider integration on both the east and west.

  2. Transformation of the U.S. Hegemony in Europe through NATO after the Cold War

    existence in the continent. Through the end of the Cold War, changes can be observed in the behaviors of European Community members for common foreign and defense arrangements. European Political Cooperation (EPC), launched informally in 1970 was formally enshrined in the Single European Act (SEA)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work