• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is meant by the Clash of Civilisations? What criticisms can be made of Huntingtons thesis and to what extent would you regard them as valid?

Extracts from this document...


What is meant by the Clash of Civilisations? What criticisms can be made of Huntington?s thesis and to what extent would you regard them as valid? ?The Clash of Civilisations? a term given by Samuel Huntington to explain thesis about ?a new phase? in world politics after the end of the cold war, in which he argues that the greatest divisions among humankind will be between ?Islam? and ?Western? cultures. Huntington agreed with Fukuyama that the age of ideology has come to the end but he did not believe in ?end of history?, arguing that all countries will not accept ?liberal democracy and free-trade system?. His belief was that now there would be cultural and religious conflicts, as in the past: ?the fault lines between civilizations will be the battle lines of the future?. Huntington divided the world into the ?major civilizations? ? this included Western; Islamic; Japan; Hindu etc. In order to prove his positions he argues that the break up of Yugoslavia; Wars in Chechnya; India and Pakistan conflict and 9/11 clearly show the support of his Clash of Civilization ideas. In his eyes, the emergence of new smaller states and the wars between them show the cultural conflict as well as religious one. Wars in Chechnya, he believes, could be seen as ?Jihad Wars? thus Chechens fighting for the Islamic state with Sharia law which, he assumes, will be hostile to the western ?universal norms?. ...read more.


Also, he emphasised the ?Islamic Revolution? which took pace from the 1960 into 1970s many young Arabic intellectuals became disgusted by the way their rules were totally embracing the western way of life such as massive consumer spending and totally ignoring the conditions of their poor subjects. As a result radicals saw their Sheikhs [originally religious leaders but in this context just a leader] as debasing Islam. This eventually resulted in the Iranian revolution of 1979 in which the Shah of Iran was forcebly deposed. Controversially he [Samuel Huntington] argues that ?Islam has bloody borders? ? he was referring to the massive population explosion in the Middle East and Islamic proximity to many civilisations including Orthodox and Western, e.g. Chechnya. He also identifies common Chinese and Islamic interests in the areas of weapons proliferation, human rights and democracy and he feels that this areas in which these two civilisations will cooperate e.g. the very close trade links in nuclear technology between China and Iran which is led to demands in the West, especially by Tony Blair, that the West ?must deal with? that rogue state ? Iran. He believes that Civilisations conflicts are ?particularly relevant between Muslims and non-Muslims?. He highlights that Western universalism i.e. the view that all civilisations should adopt Western values is the key issue that infuriates Islamic Fundamentalists. However there are some criticisms of Huntington?s thesis given by different scholars. ...read more.


For example, in recent Tunisian and Egypt protests we could see a very strong anti-American mood and it is one of the reasons of protests as citizens are not satisfied of their countries being puppet state of USA. The ?Clash? emerged after 9/11 as US intervention into Middle East and media outcry began. The constant accusation from both sides led to hostility between the ?Muslim? and ?Western? countries. The recent wars in Middle East and terror acts in the West shows the matter. Of course there is some truth in Said?s and other scholar?s arguments but it is simply just a theory and idealistic views. Many (not all of course) Westerns openly hate Islam and condemn all Islamic values mainly due to negative media look on Islam and constant terror acts on Western territories. Many Muslims also condemn Western values due to their religious views. Also hostility is raised by the wars in Middle East, support of Israel and criticisms made of Islam even by high profile politicians. Bush?s remark of ?Islamic fascism? made millions of Muslims extremely anti-American and worsened the situation badly. The recent caricature scandal where Dutch artist draw the Muslim Prophet made many millions angry again. Summing up all of the above it could be said that although in theory the criticisms given by scholars are stronger than Huntington?s points, in real world Huntington?s theory does fit. Therefore the argument of ?Clash of Civilizations? is valid and real nowadays. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Utilitarianism: Explanation And Study of Criticisms

    The rule utilitarian believes that there are enough similarities among people and situations to justify setting up general rules to govern our actions. Problems for rule utilitarians include the following: It's hard to be sure that the rules will bring about the best consequences for all affected Its hard to

  2. Liberalism Notes

    * Late 20th century/early 21st century - Liberal revival? (Steel): European Union (Ashdown), devolution (Kennedy). THE WHIG TRADITION * Whig party in 17th century - opposed royal absolutism and championed religious dissent; support for rights of parliament and for limits on royal power.

  1. What exactly is Weber's Protestant Ethic Thesis?

    The system involves production lines in which there is a division of labour and specialisation of work tasks. Marx was concerned with what he saw as the dehumanising effects of capitalism. He felt that the division of labour resulted in workers becoming removed from the products of their work, and from each other.

  2. Communism VS Democracy

    The initial counter argument to this is that this arrangement has lead to a mass society , whereby humankind is experiencing a radical dehumanization of life, and that humankind is losing out on the personal human contact that help us treat each other better, not as objects to be bought or sold8.

  1. What are the main features of utilitarianism as an ethical theory (10) Examine and ...

    This is Sidgwick's interpretation of utilitarianism. Sidgwick is therefore a believer in the utilitarian principle. Fyodor Dostoyevsky wrote a book called Crime and Punishment, in this book the character Rasklnikov explains strong rule utilitarianism; "I maintain that if the discoveries of Kepler and Newton could not have been made known

  2. Is the Liberal perspective on world politics too idealistic?

    This theory essentially argues the more states are intertwined the less chance of military conlict. (Gray, John. 1993) Referring back to the question, on whether Liberal perspective on World Politics is too idealistic, one can argue that this is not the case.

  1. To what extent do recent elections in the UK and the USA support the ...

    I must question whether recent elections have shown there to be a decrease in non-partisan voters indicating dealignment in voting in the UK and USA. Certainly, there seems to be much support for the decrease in partisanship amongst scholars in Britain; "party loyalties have increasingly become overridden by other short term factors in recent election."

  2. To what extent is the global system now multipolar?

    with the free movement of labor and trade contributing to its success. But the economy of the EU as whole took a huge blow with nation states such as Portugal, Italy, Ireland and Greece requiring a large amount of support to just keep the system ongoing.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work