• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What is meant by the Clash of Civilisations? What criticisms can be made of Huntingtons thesis and to what extent would you regard them as valid?

Extracts from this document...


What is meant by the Clash of Civilisations? What criticisms can be made of Huntington?s thesis and to what extent would you regard them as valid? ?The Clash of Civilisations? a term given by Samuel Huntington to explain thesis about ?a new phase? in world politics after the end of the cold war, in which he argues that the greatest divisions among humankind will be between ?Islam? and ?Western? cultures. Huntington agreed with Fukuyama that the age of ideology has come to the end but he did not believe in ?end of history?, arguing that all countries will not accept ?liberal democracy and free-trade system?. His belief was that now there would be cultural and religious conflicts, as in the past: ?the fault lines between civilizations will be the battle lines of the future?. Huntington divided the world into the ?major civilizations? ? this included Western; Islamic; Japan; Hindu etc. In order to prove his positions he argues that the break up of Yugoslavia; Wars in Chechnya; India and Pakistan conflict and 9/11 clearly show the support of his Clash of Civilization ideas. In his eyes, the emergence of new smaller states and the wars between them show the cultural conflict as well as religious one. Wars in Chechnya, he believes, could be seen as ?Jihad Wars? thus Chechens fighting for the Islamic state with Sharia law which, he assumes, will be hostile to the western ?universal norms?. ...read more.


Also, he emphasised the ?Islamic Revolution? which took pace from the 1960 into 1970s many young Arabic intellectuals became disgusted by the way their rules were totally embracing the western way of life such as massive consumer spending and totally ignoring the conditions of their poor subjects. As a result radicals saw their Sheikhs [originally religious leaders but in this context just a leader] as debasing Islam. This eventually resulted in the Iranian revolution of 1979 in which the Shah of Iran was forcebly deposed. Controversially he [Samuel Huntington] argues that ?Islam has bloody borders? ? he was referring to the massive population explosion in the Middle East and Islamic proximity to many civilisations including Orthodox and Western, e.g. Chechnya. He also identifies common Chinese and Islamic interests in the areas of weapons proliferation, human rights and democracy and he feels that this areas in which these two civilisations will cooperate e.g. the very close trade links in nuclear technology between China and Iran which is led to demands in the West, especially by Tony Blair, that the West ?must deal with? that rogue state ? Iran. He believes that Civilisations conflicts are ?particularly relevant between Muslims and non-Muslims?. He highlights that Western universalism i.e. the view that all civilisations should adopt Western values is the key issue that infuriates Islamic Fundamentalists. However there are some criticisms of Huntington?s thesis given by different scholars. ...read more.


For example, in recent Tunisian and Egypt protests we could see a very strong anti-American mood and it is one of the reasons of protests as citizens are not satisfied of their countries being puppet state of USA. The ?Clash? emerged after 9/11 as US intervention into Middle East and media outcry began. The constant accusation from both sides led to hostility between the ?Muslim? and ?Western? countries. The recent wars in Middle East and terror acts in the West shows the matter. Of course there is some truth in Said?s and other scholar?s arguments but it is simply just a theory and idealistic views. Many (not all of course) Westerns openly hate Islam and condemn all Islamic values mainly due to negative media look on Islam and constant terror acts on Western territories. Many Muslims also condemn Western values due to their religious views. Also hostility is raised by the wars in Middle East, support of Israel and criticisms made of Islam even by high profile politicians. Bush?s remark of ?Islamic fascism? made millions of Muslims extremely anti-American and worsened the situation badly. The recent caricature scandal where Dutch artist draw the Muslim Prophet made many millions angry again. Summing up all of the above it could be said that although in theory the criticisms given by scholars are stronger than Huntington?s points, in real world Huntington?s theory does fit. Therefore the argument of ?Clash of Civilizations? is valid and real nowadays. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Political Philosophy section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Political Philosophy essays

  1. Liberalism Notes

    Hence liberalism differs here from traditional conservatism (more pessimistic about human nature) and socialism (deny reconciliation can be readily achieved) SUMMARY OF THE HISTORICAL WHIG-LIBERAL TRADITION * 17th century - Puritanism and Parliamentarism * Late 17th/18th century - The Whig Tradition: 'Glorious Revolution' (Locke), constitutional monarchy, government by consent, division of powers, religious toleration (Charles James Fox), oligarchy, mercantilism.

  2. Utilitarianism: Explanation And Study of Criticisms

    The rule utilitarian believes that there are enough similarities among people and situations to justify setting up general rules to govern our actions. Problems for rule utilitarians include the following: It's hard to be sure that the rules will bring about the best consequences for all affected Its hard to

  1. Is the Liberal perspective on world politics too idealistic?

    Globalisations is one of the factors Complex Interdependence, this means that consumers in England could buy a cheaper sweater manufactured in Indonesia rather than pay more for and english made one, given individuals more freedom of choice. The Liberal believe that the promotion and the emphasis on freedom in liberal

  2. What exactly is Weber's Protestant Ethic Thesis?

    Sociologists generally use the term 'capitalist' to describe a particular way in which economic production is organised. Karl Marx is considered to be the major interpreter of modern society as capitalist society, and more specifically, he saw capitalism as an economic system in which the main priority is the maximization of profit, achieved through the exploitation of labour.

  1. Russia's Political Party System as an Obstacle to Democratization

    Opportunism goes a long way toward explaining the phenomenon of the many "taxi" parties, and some of the more visible parties that are born and die out every election cycle as well, plus the abundance of independent candidates who dispense with party labels.

  2. To what extent do recent elections in the UK and the USA support the ...

    Seemingly, it can be summed up, as "Voters' loyalties were emotional rather than rational." (www.rdg.ac.uk) If we look back to our definition of dealignment, we can see that one of its characteristics was that fewer voters were aligned to a party.

  1. What are the main features of utilitarianism as an ethical theory (10) Examine and ...

    actions are good or bad on the way they make us feel. However, there are flaws in this; such as the fact that it misunderstands happiness, happiness is a response we have to actions, this is very different to deciding what to do to make us happy, and then deliberately doing so, making it merely a means to an end.

  2. To what extent is the global system now multipolar?

    However, one cannot pin the rise of China solely on the reason why the global system in now not multipolar because the recent demise of the European Union must be taken into account. When the EU was initially formed and up until around 2005 it was a very powerful continent

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work